I have a 2012 2500 crew cab ST w/ 4WD; rear axle is 3. 73 ratio, automatic transmission - bought new.
I have a 1995 Jayco Eagle Series 304 BH travel trailer - it is a tandem axle pull-type trailer - new to me. If I have a correct understanding from my reading it is rated:
GVWR = 7,800 lbs. I believe this is the Gross Vehicle Weight Rating, which means that this is the maximum amount the trailer and contents is rated for; that is, this is the highest loaded weight allowed.
GAWR front = 3,500 lbs; same for GAWR rear. I believe this is the Gross Axle Weight Rating, which is the weight an individual axle is designed to carry.
The axle tubes measure three inches in diameter and are slightly bowed up - that is, the distance from the ground to the bottom of the axles is greater in the middle of the axle than at the end of the axle. There is three includes of distance from the axle top to the frame. It appears, as best I could measure, that the center of the axles is four inches lower than the center of the wheel spindle. I believe all of this so far means that there are two 3,500 lb four-inch drop axles which are cambered (if I understand all this correctly).
The suspension is the leaf spring type - each end of the springs has an eye, and there is an equalizer in the middle. The end bolts are ordinary nuts and bolts - no grease fittings. There are three leaves in each spring.
It has drum brakes that are electrically activated - a magnet setup. The drums are ten inches in diameter.
It has 15" by 5" wheels with ST205/75 R15 tires with load range C stamped on them. The wheels have five bolt holes.
OK - it seems to me the suspension is right at the border of inadequate - actually, I don't understand how the axles can be rated such that they will carry 7,000 pounds, the tires rated such that they will carry 7,200 pounds, and the trailer saying that it can be loaded up to 7,800 pounds. How is that safe - I don't even see how the arithmetic works. ???
This returns me to my original thinking: since the suspension and braking is all 18 years old, and complete assemblies appear to be readily available, why not replace the entire axle assemblies with 5,200 lb rated axles. This would have four leaves per spring. All the brake hardware would be new as well. I could also improve with steel bushings in the spring eyes as well as the bolts with the grease fittings for the spring eyes. To my mind this suspension would be safely capable of carrying the load - it seems simple to me that if you are only asking 75%-80% of the capability of the hardware that you should be in good shape (in contrast to asking somewhat over 100% of the capability of the hardware).
Finally, I think it would make sense to go to a 225/75 R15 load range D tire up from a 205/75 R15 load range C. If I understand it correctly I would then also be at 75%-80% of the rated capability of the tire - again, rather than a little over 100% of the rated capability.
In a nutshell, it seems to me that the suspension and tires are just barely adequate for the job, and that if I want to roll across the country with no worries I should have a suspension that is not being pushed to its limit (or a little past its limit).
My perspective on this is pretty simple - I expect that my wife, two boys, and two dogs will take the rig and go somewhere and I'll catch up with them on the weekend - then they will take the rig and come back or go somewhere else for me to catch up to again (I get to be at work - how it goes, I guess). So, my goal is that the rig is absolutely safe. There is going to be a whole lot more of value in that rig than the cash in my wallet.
Thoughts? Am I making sense on any of this?
This is a follow-up to my original thread which raised a number of issues. I am still reading and educating myself on
1) LT versus ST tires for trailers, (2) weight distributing hitches, (3) trailer anti-sway components for hitches, and (4) trailer brake controller - specifically MaxBrake.
P. S. - after looking into all this in more detail I am even happier with my choice of truck than before. If I round GVWR to 8,000 lbs, then it seems to me I will be working with the truck at around 75% - 80% of its rated towing capability.
Thanks to all for your earlier responses, as well as now.
Russell
I have a 1995 Jayco Eagle Series 304 BH travel trailer - it is a tandem axle pull-type trailer - new to me. If I have a correct understanding from my reading it is rated:
GVWR = 7,800 lbs. I believe this is the Gross Vehicle Weight Rating, which means that this is the maximum amount the trailer and contents is rated for; that is, this is the highest loaded weight allowed.
GAWR front = 3,500 lbs; same for GAWR rear. I believe this is the Gross Axle Weight Rating, which is the weight an individual axle is designed to carry.
The axle tubes measure three inches in diameter and are slightly bowed up - that is, the distance from the ground to the bottom of the axles is greater in the middle of the axle than at the end of the axle. There is three includes of distance from the axle top to the frame. It appears, as best I could measure, that the center of the axles is four inches lower than the center of the wheel spindle. I believe all of this so far means that there are two 3,500 lb four-inch drop axles which are cambered (if I understand all this correctly).
The suspension is the leaf spring type - each end of the springs has an eye, and there is an equalizer in the middle. The end bolts are ordinary nuts and bolts - no grease fittings. There are three leaves in each spring.
It has drum brakes that are electrically activated - a magnet setup. The drums are ten inches in diameter.
It has 15" by 5" wheels with ST205/75 R15 tires with load range C stamped on them. The wheels have five bolt holes.
OK - it seems to me the suspension is right at the border of inadequate - actually, I don't understand how the axles can be rated such that they will carry 7,000 pounds, the tires rated such that they will carry 7,200 pounds, and the trailer saying that it can be loaded up to 7,800 pounds. How is that safe - I don't even see how the arithmetic works. ???
This returns me to my original thinking: since the suspension and braking is all 18 years old, and complete assemblies appear to be readily available, why not replace the entire axle assemblies with 5,200 lb rated axles. This would have four leaves per spring. All the brake hardware would be new as well. I could also improve with steel bushings in the spring eyes as well as the bolts with the grease fittings for the spring eyes. To my mind this suspension would be safely capable of carrying the load - it seems simple to me that if you are only asking 75%-80% of the capability of the hardware that you should be in good shape (in contrast to asking somewhat over 100% of the capability of the hardware).
Finally, I think it would make sense to go to a 225/75 R15 load range D tire up from a 205/75 R15 load range C. If I understand it correctly I would then also be at 75%-80% of the rated capability of the tire - again, rather than a little over 100% of the rated capability.
In a nutshell, it seems to me that the suspension and tires are just barely adequate for the job, and that if I want to roll across the country with no worries I should have a suspension that is not being pushed to its limit (or a little past its limit).
My perspective on this is pretty simple - I expect that my wife, two boys, and two dogs will take the rig and go somewhere and I'll catch up with them on the weekend - then they will take the rig and come back or go somewhere else for me to catch up to again (I get to be at work - how it goes, I guess). So, my goal is that the rig is absolutely safe. There is going to be a whole lot more of value in that rig than the cash in my wallet.
Thoughts? Am I making sense on any of this?
This is a follow-up to my original thread which raised a number of issues. I am still reading and educating myself on

P. S. - after looking into all this in more detail I am even happier with my choice of truck than before. If I round GVWR to 8,000 lbs, then it seems to me I will be working with the truck at around 75% - 80% of its rated towing capability.
Thanks to all for your earlier responses, as well as now.
Russell