I cast some small block Chevy heads back in the mid 80's, and although I did rotate the deck to lessen the 23 degree valve angle, and reduce chamber volume. The plug position was optimised, and of course the ports were adequate, and the inlet ports were properly biased to promote swirl. The pistons were "unique" in shape... all I'll say is they had no dish, except two . 120" valve reliefs. They were certainly of the domed variety. Those small blocks were 358 cid. engines with 1. 75-1 rod length to stroke ratio, very short cam timing... 235 degrees @ . 050", and the intake manifolds were some of my Edelbrock "specials" with Murray Jenson prepared Holley 830 cfm carbs. Those engines had "over" 16-1 static CR, and dynamic compression was so high we had to use custom starters run off 24 volts.
They were installed in some Camaros and two pick-up trucks. They all ran 91 octane unleaded pump gas. They never detonated, the mileage was 37 (combined) for the cars and 25 for the trucks. The Camaro's had Turbo 400 automatic transmissions, and from off idle you'd swear that there was at least a 454 under the hood... the throttle response was almost too quick. Those "loaded" cars all ran 12's with ease. The trucks had pulling ability that no body imagined, and were a dream to drive, especially compared to their street counterparts.
So, yes. If something as crude as a small block Chevy can be that efficient, some of the more "modern" chambered heads can certainly do the same and considerably better.