Veterans Day Slap-In-The-Face!

Attention: TDR Forum Junkies
To the point: Click this link and check out the Front Page News story(ies) where we are tracking the introduction of the 2025 Ram HD trucks.

Thanks, TDR Staff

Who has a Grand Cherokee...

Happy Birthday Sled Puller!!!

Kinda long, but so scary it can't be ignored!



We put our lives on the line every single day just following orders given to us by the appointed civilian leaders to protect and serve in an often thankless and mis-portrayed job..... but outright hostility towards the very people that provide the rights of people to protest? This sounds exactly like the personage that was spitting on Vietnam Vets as they returned from tours of duty... ... It can be corroborated at the following page from the university so it's presumed true. Note-Read it all the way thru.

http://www.sxu.edu/academ/artsci/history/pkirstein/



Sregorb

ps. This is sweeping the net faster than our diesel's can go!

Please note this post is NOT made in antagonistic desire. No replies are necessary and is only meant to inform... ... .



----- Original Message -----



Hateful Letters to a Soldier - From a Leftist Professor

Letters from a Leftist Professor | November 8, 2002





Last week I got a message containing an email exchange between an Air Force Academy cadet and a professor who responded very rudely to a polite request for information. I didn't run it because I couldn't verify it and the professor's response seemed so stereotypically rude and anti-military that I wasn't entirely sure it was real.



The Air Force Academy has a program called The Academy Assembly. An Air Force Academy cadet named Robert Kurpiel sent an e-mail to which ended up in the hands of Peter Kirstein, Professor of History at Saint Xavier University.



Here is the text of that e-mail:



Dear Sir or Ma'am

The Air Force Academy is going to be having our annual Academy Assembly. This is a forum for mainly but not only Political Science majors, discussing very important issues dealing with politics. Right now we are in the planning stage for advertising and we would appreciate your help in the follow (sic) areas. Do you know of or have methods or ways for interschool advertising and or communications? What would be the best way for us to advertise at your school whether it is sending you the fliers and you making copies or by perhaps putting an advertisement in your local publication? We would appreciate your input and the cost of what your recommend. Thank you for your time and consideration.

Very Respectfully,

Cadet Robert Kurpiel



Here is the response from Professor Kirstein:



From: Peter Kirstein

Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2002 1:46 PM

To: Kurpiel Robert C4C CS26

Subject: Re: Academy Assembly

You are a disgrace to this country and I am furious you would even think I would support you and your aggressive baby killing tactics of collateral damage. Help you recruit. Who, top guns to reign death and destruction upon nonwhite peoples throughout the world? Are you serious sir? Resign your commission and serve your country with honour.



No war, no air force cowards who bomb countries with AAA, without possibility of retaliation. You are worse than the snipers. You are imperialists who are turning the whole damn world against us. September 11 can be blamed in part for what you and your cohorts have done to Palestinians, the VC, the Serbs, a retreating army at Basra.

You are unworthy of my support.

Peter N. Kirstein

Professor of History

Saint Xavier University



The Air Force Academy stepped in and tried to calm the situation. Here is a letter from the Director of the Academy Assembly.



Subject: An Open Letter from the Academy Assembly

Ladies and Gentlemen,

There has been considerable attention given to an e-mail received by a Fourth Class Cadet here at the United States Air Force Academy from Professor Peter N. Kirstein of Saint Xavier University. Dr Kirstein's e-mail was a response to an e-mail he had received concerning the Academy Assembly.



The Academy Assembly is a forum to promote academic discussion of important issues of our day and to allow the student delegates from all over the North America to draft a report that is widely disseminated. This year our theme is America's Challenges in an Unstable World: Balancing Security with Liberty. I am pleased to say that a "cyber-episode" which started poorly has evolved into a more professional and academic discussion.



Please find below a letter of apology from Dr Kirstein which I received this morning, accompanied by a phone call. I have drafted this message in response to his correspondence and with an advance copy to Dr. Kirstein.



On behalf of the Academy Assembly I accept this apology in the same sincere manner in which it was given. Furthermore, I offer my own apology to Dr Kirstein for the way his original message, which was intended as private communication, was spread throughout the Air Force Academy and beyond. Since that e-mail was forwarded with such great vigor to many individuals both within and outside the Air Force Academy I would ask that you, the reader of this letter, please forward this e-mail to anyone to whom you sent the original message.



Two results of this are obvious and I want to share them with you. The first is that through well considered words and messages a situation that was initially highly inflammatory has become one in which diverse ideas can be compared and discussed; this is the essence of the Academy Assembly. Second, though emotions have run understandably high throughout the USAFA Cadet Wing in response to this e-mail, replies to this e-mail from our cadets have been, almost without exception, marked by great maturity and professionalism. I was presented nearly forty proposed responses to the original e-mail from cadets, but the one that best encapsulates the opinion of the cadet wing is a quote from their book, Contrails, which serves as not only a statement for others, but an admonition for themselves.



"It is the soldier, not the reporter who has given us the freedom of the press. It is the soldier, not the poet, who has given us the freedom of speech. It is the soldier, not the campus organizer, who gives us the freedom to demonstrate. It is the soldier who salutes the flag, who serves beneath the flag, and whose coffin is draped by the flag, who allows the protester to burn the flag. "

~Father Dennis Edward O'Brien, Sergeant, USMC



I would dare to add one thought to the above quote; that we in the military, as servants of the public, must carefully guard and cherish our relationship with the civilian community. We must always remain open and responsive to legitimate criticism that is presented in a spirit of willingness to improve the forces that guard our country and make them an institution that all Americans can take pride in. I am pleased to say that this discussion, of which many of you only saw the first portion, has moved towards that high plain.

Respectfully yours,

Captain Jim Borders

USAFA Director, Academy Assembly Instructor

Political Science



And, here is the apology written by the Professor.



Dear Captain Borders,

I have expressed to Cadet Kurpiel my regrets over what I communicated to him in my e-mail. I did not mean to impugn his character. I am sure he is of the highest character. I should have written him in a more thoughtful and contemplative manner. As one who believes in non-violence and the avoidance of conflict, I could have been more circumspect and creative in my communication with him.



Cadet Kurpiel has sent me several generous, thoughtful and impressive e-mails. He has also expressed "apologies" for the unwarranted national distribution of a private e-mail correspondence which has caused me and others to receive 100s of e-mail messages. I hope this update on my response and the cadet's kind communication will serve to inform the public that this issue has been resolved with dignity and honour between myself and Cadet Kurpiel.

I remain respectfully yours,

Peter N. Kirstein

Professor of History Saint Xavier University



http://206.183.2.199/Articles/ReadArticle.asp?ID=4504
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Unbelievable! Educated @ssh01e! It's a good thing this prof stays well away from military service, he is a strong candidate for friendly fire. For some reason I stereotype him as the jerk that casually parks his Jaguar in handicapped spaces.



Well isn't that special! Here's the Prof's page

http://www.sxu.edu/history/pkirstein/



Well he didn't personnally apologise to me. So he going to hear from me too.



Happy Veterans Day professor!





JJ
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I also guess the professor does not believe in freedom of the press. When he pressed "send" to that hatefull message he typed, he gave permission for his signed letter and its views to be freely distributed. He regrets that it was not kept private. But he belives in all the "rights" that he "deserves" that are in the constition. Including freedom of the press. I should hope maybe someone sends that E-mail to the parents of some of the applicants to that college. A lot of them would be veterans. The collge professor is within his rights to have those views. Parents and students are within thier rights to not go to that school. and to voice thier opinions by the lack of checks to the bursars office.
 
Another slap in the face from our president

The new defense bill in Congress has a provision that will allow vets to collect disability payments along with retirement benefits, the same as all other retired federal government employees. Right now vets can only collect one or the other, not both. GWB says he will veto the bill if this provision isn't struck from it.
 
From the Professor's website:



"Academic Freedom is Never Free. "



I wonder if he even thinks about how many soldiers have fought and died to provide this "Freedom. "



Of course, those very same soldiers fought and died so that he can have his viewpoint.



Serves him right (if it is so) that the university suspended him.



JMHO, YMMV, etc.



Duane
 
Kindly explain how my freedom has been protected by the US military. Facts please, generalizations won't cut it. Be specific on the threats to said freedom. Thanks.



Jay
 
My USAF experience

As a proud grad of the Academy (within the last 4 years) I can perhaps provide some insight into this.



I was involved in the Academy Assembly my Junior and Senior years because I was a political science major. I met and know the Capt Jim Borders mentioned in the email who smoothed things over, since he was on faculty.



My overall impression from interacting with the students from the other universities was one of disappointment. The vast majority fo our ideological exchanges and debates were spent debunking so much liberal dogma. It left me with the distinct feeling that most American universities are DOMINATED by elitist liberals (ranging from near socialist to total Communist), and that little original thought it conducted. It appeared that most of the students had been "taught" WHAT to think, not HOW. Many of them were simply programmed. When confronted with a sound, reasoned argument, they would resort to ad hominem attacks because they could not counter with persuasive academic debate.



I wish I could say that this vicious email attack from the professor was representative of only a small minority of people. The fact is, only about 20 Universities are invited to the Assembly. The popularity of this anti-military peacenik ideology in the american system of colleges and universities is much more prevalent than you would like to know.



David Horowitz has done an outstanding job of documenting the Anti-American movement so popular at many higher learning centers. Check him out at this site Horowitz is a former 60's radical liberal who now spends his time debunking the flawed ideology and battling overwhelming liberal bias in education. He has gained notoriety arguing against the Reparations movement-- check that part out on his site.



Every barrel has it's rotten apples, and while I was at the Academy, I saw some among my fellow cadets. But overall, I was inspired to see this cross section of American excellence. I only hope that I can be worthy of being called a classmate of theirs. While I will most likely not go on to a position of high leadership in America, statistically many cadets do later in life. If they do, we are in good hands.



I count my acacemy experience as one of the greatest blessings I have had in my life. The reputation of the education is very good. More importantly, it gave me a love of our beloved country so deep that I could never hope to successfully describe it.



It pains me to see this professor take the freedom that soldiers have died to provide and use it to to discredit their honor. It seems a little disingenuous to me. What do YOU think?
 
.

First off, baby. driver, you can't honestly be a citizen of the United States of America, the greatest and most powerful nation ever known to the world, and not realize that we are the greatest and most powerful nation ever know to the world BECAUSE OF OUR MILITARY! I honestly don't think I need to give any instances of how the Marines, or the Navy, or the Air Force, or the Army have personally protected your freedoms... in fact, if you honestly can say they haven't, I invite you to go and become a citizen of China, where there is no such thing as human rights, or how about Singapore where if you steal something you get your hand chopped off... even better, go to Iraq for a week, and try to write a news article about how Sadaam is not a good President, or go on national TV there (which is Govt. controlled) and say something along the lines of "Even though you may not agree with him, he's still our President" (said by a national broadcaster about GWB before his speech after Sept. 11) and see how long you get to stay at home that night.





Secondly, I am so thankful that I go to a school that can be considered extremely conservative. We have one of the largest detatchements of Air Force ROTC in the Western U. S. , and they are all very good at what they do. No, I'm not a part of them, but I respect every one of them for what they're doing.



Ok, soap-box away, and asbestos suit on and fully zipped up... flame away!



Josh.
 
I will contact the University tomorrow.

This prof should be fired. PERIOD.



baby. driver nothing is free. Your freedom was/is paid for with the blood of the US Military.
 
Here are a few BabyDriver

Guadalcanal

Corrigedor

Iwo Jima

Normandy

Wake Island

Tarawa

Leyte Gulf

Chosin Reservoir

Khe Sanh

DaNang

Grenada



And too many more to list. I am a member of the NRA and a firm advocate of the right to keep and bear arms, but if you think that an armed public is the ONLY reason we have not been invaded, think again.
 
Baby Driver,

Surly you jest, at 49 years old you are a product of WWII era parents. Prehaps you should spend the day in a nursing home and ask the same question and then take a vaction in any of the Commie Countrys of your chioce and report back your findings on personal freedoms and Liberty in general.



Fire the Professor



TJ - Vietnan Vet

Son of WWII Vet

Grandson of WWI Vet
 
Much as I appreciate the responses

No one has begun to answer my question.



As for WWII, all of you must surely know that was a result of US involvement in WWI.



I live in the USA, not in any of the other places any of you have mentioned. Please explain, as I earlier requested, how our nations military in those other places protects my freedoms HERE.



This is not a joke, and I don't for one minute not appreciate the potential of our forces. Don't be offended just because you cannot answer the question.



Don't pretend I badmouthed the US Military because I didn't.

Calling me names is not an appropiate answer to the original question.



Jay
 
If you/we/me knew everything the US did to protect us, then an attacker would know exactly how to attack us a and win.



They ARE protecting us, the way we see it, is that we are not like other un-protected countries, we have freedoms that are taken by granted by us, and lusted after by people in other countries.



My $. 02



Merrick Cummings Jr
 
Re: Much as I appreciate the responses

Originally posted by baby. driver

No one has begun to answer my question.



As for WWII, all of you must surely know that was a result of US involvement in WWI.



I live in the USA, not in any of the other places any of you have mentioned. Please explain, as I earlier requested, how our nations military in those other places protects my freedoms HERE.



This is not a joke, and I don't for one minute not appreciate the potential of our forces. Don't be offended just because you cannot answer the question.



Don't pretend I badmouthed the US Military because I didn't.

Calling me names is not an appropiate answer to the original question.



Jay
And all this time I thought that WWII started because a crazy kraut started invading other countries and killing millions of innocent civilians, guess I had over looked the WWI angle:rolleyes:



Never occured to you that we are free over here, 'cause the other *******s are afraid of what our military will do to them if they don't stay over there and mind their own business?



if you can't answer your own question then I don't think there is enough words in the english language to make understand how they did and do protec your freedoms here.



Glenn
 
Re: Much as I appreciate the responses

Originally posted by baby. driver
No one has begun to answer my question.

As for WWII, all of you must surely know that was a result of US involvement in WWI.

I live in the USA, not in any of the other places any of you have mentioned. Please explain, as I earlier requested, how our nations military in those other places protects my freedoms HERE... .

How has the US military protected our freedoms? Imagine the US under Nazi rule. Or under Soviet rule. Imagine if the US had been allowed to break up as a result of the civil war going the other way. Imagine if Germany/Italy/Japan had won and split up the world amongst themselves. Our military directly prevented any of those things happening, in several cases via direct, ugle war. In the case of the USSR, our nuke capability kept them in line.

Today, the ability of our military to utterly destroy an enemy keeps a lot of potential attackers at bay. Do you think, if we had a weak military, that Mexico would hesitate to 'reclaim' the American Southwest? I don't. Do you think the Soviets would have refrained from invading us via Cuba? I don't. Do you think we would have beaten England in the War of 1812 if we had a weak military? I don't.

Had we lost the War of 1812, the US wouldn't exist. Had the Soviets invaded and won, many Americans would have lost their freedoms and liberties. And lives.

Just the fact that we have a strong military that can project our might anywhere in the world causes many rogue leaders to think thrice about attacking us. t also gives pause to other respectable leaders who might wish to expand their territory.

As for WWII, *officially* we entered the war because of Pearl Harbor. *I* believe our leaders wanted to enter much sooner, but couldn't because there was a very strong pacifist movement. That movement faded when the Japanese were 'allowed' to attack Pearl; it was the event that would allow our leaders to declare war and mobilize the people behind them.

WWII was fought almost purely for control of energy sources, specifically oil. Germany invaded the USSR to control the oil fields there. Japan conquered the South Pacific and SE Asia to control the oil sources there.

Germany started losing WWII when the failed to get and hold the USSR's oil fields. They got *real* good producing liquid fuel from coal, but it wasn't enough, and they were becoming hard pressed to move their men and equipment. And once we cut Japan off from the oil sources they tried to get, Japan started withdrawing back to the islands, because they could no longer power their ships and aircraft.

WWI came about because of all the interlocking treaties and aliiances that existed back then. All that mess needed was a trigger, provided by the assassinatation of the Archduke of the Austro-Hungarion Empire. Our involvement in WWII came about because we would not let our friends France and Brittain fall. Well, France fell, but Britain did not.

Our military have done a lot to protect our freedoms, liberties and lives. Without our military, the United States would have ceased to exist a long time ago. Had that happened, we likely would have ended up with very few liberties and freedoms. We likely would not have the Internet today; we likely would not have much beyond very expensive telephones and a few tightly-controlled newspapers. Our freedoms to dream, to invent, our rights to communicate, to keep and bear arms, to own property, to be secure from unwarranted government-sanctioned invasions into our homes, would have been the first things 'revoked'. The world would not be as advanced as it is today; there would be no '1st world nations', only a few '2nd world' nations, and a lot of '3rd world' nations.

But we have all we have today because , though the United States has generally tried to walk softly, she has always carried a big stick - the US Military.

Fest3er
 
Jay,



Every single day, with or without your knowing or acknowledging it, the military trains, equips, and fights to allow every single man, woman, and child in the United States to be who they chose to be and live a life how they want to live. The military guards borders, watches for foreign threats 24/7 (ie, NORAD, Network/Internet/FAA/Powergrid security (CERT)), projects American presence into sometimes hostile territory so that civilians are not risked/lost (done by direction-more on that later), protects allies and inject structure where sometimes there is none , and provides a fantastic deterrant against state-sponsored hostile acts just simply by existing! Make no mistake--The threats AND ACTS are attempts to change/usurp/disrupt/upset/overturn/etc our (your) way of life.

Common rationale that all should be able to follow is if one is a foreign country and that country does not like the policies of the other (us), before any act is carried out an evaluation of the likelyhood of winning the conflict has to be done. If the opposing side (us) is stronger, chances are you will A-not commit the hostile act and find another avenue (like diplomacy!) or B-turn to asymmetric warfare (like terrorism). The military provides research, training and equipment in mass-casualty acts/accidents. The military protects and provides a working government in case of diaster (I for one was very happy to see GWB flying on the command post during 911 with fighter escorts provided by the... ... yep, military). It also shielded the VP and other key members to provide you with a working government, communications, and not just a little comfort in times of crises.

Make no mistake, threats are there (always have been and always will be) and when those threats become acts that I'm d@mn glad we have a (relatively) strong military to provide a tool/option/bargaining chip by the elected civilian population.

The pentagon does not arbitrarily decide to go start wars and noone should be angry at the military as they are only the tool of the civilian leaders who direct them.

Now there are some that can always pull that card, "What if there was a war and nobody showed up?" and what a noble, thoughtful, intellectual, futuristic approach that is. But, like most, I am a realist. Do I have faith in the human race to achieve that goal? Sure, it might happen. Do I think we as a global, multicultural, multireligion society are ready for that advanced a concept? No stinkin' way. There are just way too many simple issues that cause people to go to blows right now, let alone the complex issues. So until that can be realized I would always prefer to have elected leaders that I can trust, to look out for the greater good (even if it's at the expense of some). Kinda the "you can lose big or you can lose little, what's it gonna be?" situation... . and when dealing with foreign entities I will ALWAYS prefer my leaders to have more tools, a stronger bargaining point, and a global compromise standpoint that finds that "balance point" between our nations interests and foreign policy/soveriegnity/etc.

Make no mistake about it. The military is there to protect every citizen, even the one's that don't agree with the how/why/where/when/who/what. Is the system perfect? No way. Is the system the best we have available today? Yes, and every day it's evolving to meet the ever-changing threats and requirements of tomorrow so that people can continue to question/curse/praise it... ...

The fact that the military seems so 'transparent' and uninvolved to you (a given citizen) actually makes me feel great. Because that means the system in place is working. THAT is what we mean by that often heard phrase, "taking your freedoms for granted".

This is where the reflection "Don't know what you got til it's gone" comes into play. If/When the day comes that you or your subsequent generations hear artillery shelling, foreign aircraft bombing your city/town/house, maurading bands of foreign soldiers, populace being stripped of the constitution/bill of rights/freedom of speech/etc, or the government toppled and a dictatorship/communism/etc government installed due to a conquering power... ... you'll probably then appreciate and realize what it was that the military, YOUR military, of today provided you.



Brian
 
Back
Top