Here I am

Video conversation: 2019 3500

Attention: TDR Forum Junkies
To the point: Click this link and check out the Front Page News story(ies) where we are tracking the introduction of the 2025 Ram HD trucks.

Thanks, TDR Staff

5th Wheel Hubs

Black Widow's

My belief about newer 3500 HD RAMs being rated for 30k-35k has always made me sweat. I have often said that these trucks would most likely be lacking without 19.5" wheels and tires. I still believe that. I also in the long run think the brakes could be much better. Below video makes my point.

 
My belief about newer 3500 HD RAMs being rated for 30k-35k has always made me sweat. I have often said that these trucks would most likely be lacking without 19.5" wheels and tires. I still believe that. I also in the long run think the brakes could be much better. Below video makes my point.


I believe the new tow ratings by the "Big 3" have become ridiculous and dangerous.
Refering to your comment about the manual transmissions ... Dodge was STUPID to discontinue them. The de-tuning of the trucks with manuals was always a stupid ID, but I think they did this purposely to make them less desirable so they could discontinue them at some point. All they had to do is offer a Eaton FSBO-9406A 6 speed and I believe they would have sold like hot cakes.

But to the ridiculous weight numbers they are touting now, if you want to be pulling 30K+ around get a Pete 330 or a F650/750 or a Freightliner with air brakes. If your doing this all the time ... get the CDL and a truck MORE than capable of towing that weight with ease.

Someone who thinks they can pull 33 or 35K with a 3500 or 350 is going to get someone killed. Especially with all the electronic nonsense they put in the new cars/trucks these days it is almost impossible to NOT be distracted. Wet or snowy roads ... a load like that will just push the truck right into a line of cars on the highway no problem.
 
There was a conversation with the Chevrolet Engineers, don't remember which exact video, where the transmission engineer said they had done away with the torque management. There are so many video clips floating around that the Chevy clip might be where the "no torque management" might have come from.
 
There was a conversation with the Chevrolet Engineers, don't remember which exact video, where the transmission engineer said they had done away with the torque management. There are so many video clips floating around that the Chevy clip might be where the "no torque management" might have come from.

I'm really curious to see if that is a true statement.

Just running some quick numbers....

Torque Rating: 1000 lb/ft
1st Gear: 3.75:1
Transfer case output torque: 3,750 lb/ft.

That's above the short term torque limit for a 1550 series u-joint.

I can't find any specs on the BW 44-48 transfer case.

Point being that 3,750 lb/ft is a LOT of torque to handle in the small area that holds a pickup drive train.

Combine the axle gears and with 4.10's you could have 15,375 lb/ft (no drive-train loss) available at the rear wheels....


I just have a hard time seeing why that much torque is needed in 1-3rd gears, even with a 35K lb GCW.
 
There was a conversation with the Chevrolet Engineers, don't remember which exact video, where the transmission engineer said they had done away with the torque management. There are so many video clips floating around that the Chevy clip might be where the "no torque management" might have come from.

I watched that one, I also watched the one with the head ram guy and Mr Truck stating no TQ management.
 
Back
Top