I have been monoritoring the input fp to the VP for 2 years now. The sensor I use is the Westach solid state 387-30KV 30 psi sensor. The first one failed after about 1 year. Westach thought that was a fluke. The second one just started failing after one year. Westach thinks this is a fluke also.
Westach has replaced them without any questions or problems.
The sensors were on an 18" AN-4 snubber line, and held in place up by the hydraulic hose that goes into the brake boost assist by the fuse box under the hood. The tap for the sensor into the fuel delivery line to the VP is in a AN-6 line mid way from the bottom of the fuel filter to the VP.
I have replummed the fuel system with AN-6 line from tank to VP.
I was just wondering if anyone else has had problems keeping an electrical fp sensor functioning reading the input fp to the VP?
I am trying a different approach this time with a MUCH longer line wrapped in a coil to see if that makes any difference. My thinking is to provide a 13. 25 cubic inch fluid volume to buffer the sensor more and to coil the line so it would make it much harder for any pulses from the VP to reach the sensor.
The Westach fp sensor prefilter has worked flawlessly for two years.
Why am I on the second high quality sensor when I am reading the fp into the VP?
Ideas?
I have wanted to read the fp to the VP electrically rather than mechanically, but how do the mechanical gauges hold up over the years as an alternative?
Bob Weis
Westach has replaced them without any questions or problems.
The sensors were on an 18" AN-4 snubber line, and held in place up by the hydraulic hose that goes into the brake boost assist by the fuse box under the hood. The tap for the sensor into the fuel delivery line to the VP is in a AN-6 line mid way from the bottom of the fuel filter to the VP.
I have replummed the fuel system with AN-6 line from tank to VP.
I was just wondering if anyone else has had problems keeping an electrical fp sensor functioning reading the input fp to the VP?
I am trying a different approach this time with a MUCH longer line wrapped in a coil to see if that makes any difference. My thinking is to provide a 13. 25 cubic inch fluid volume to buffer the sensor more and to coil the line so it would make it much harder for any pulses from the VP to reach the sensor.
The Westach fp sensor prefilter has worked flawlessly for two years.
Why am I on the second high quality sensor when I am reading the fp into the VP?
Ideas?
I have wanted to read the fp to the VP electrically rather than mechanically, but how do the mechanical gauges hold up over the years as an alternative?
Bob Weis