Here I am

Engine/Transmission (1998.5 - 2002) vp44 to p7100..........

Attention: TDR Forum Junkies
To the point: Click this link and check out the Front Page News story(ies) where we are tracking the introduction of the 2025 Ram HD trucks.

Thanks, TDR Staff

Engine/Transmission (1998.5 - 2002) EDM's in, and now a problem...

Engine/Transmission (1994 - 1998) No take-off power, need help!!!!!

Status
Not open for further replies.
I looked into doing this quite extensively with my 02 that had a nasty stumble



prices all are subject to how much horsepower pump you want



I priced out a p pump conversion with a 400 hp pump, it came out to about $10,000 with them doing all the labor

(about $4000 labor)



I called peirs about two months ago (Sep 03) and they said they werent really wanting to do the conversions right now

didnt really get a clear answer as to why



my decision came down to , spend $10,000 on older truck,void all warranty, can never legally sell it because of emissions

or

trade for $10,400 for new 03



its all in how u look at it and what you are after



I shouldnt have to do a conversion for 400 hp ,but if I wanted hp like what jetpilot is running I wouldnt hesitate to do the conversion



I too would take a 12 valve over a 24 valve any day of the week
 
pumps, 12v vs. 24v

Sorry to get off the subject, but I am looking at buying a 1998 24v and was wondering if I should look out for anything as far as the fuel pump and such. It has 140000 miles on it. Any help would be greatly appreciated
 
TrqMonster



Welcome to the discussion/argument/p%ss'n match



If it has the 24v, we 2nd genners would call it a 98. 5. See if the seller has any maint records. Ask if the Lp or Inj pump have been replaced. Some of the early 24v's had problems with the vp44 due to internal clearancing issues. Any gauges on the truck? 5sp or Auto? Any transmission work done? Do you know the seller? What did he use it for? If he did a lot of heavy towing I would check for the casting number of the block. Its on the drivers side of the engine near the bottom front of the block. Some of the #53 blocks have cracked not a lot but it is something to think about.



Good luck





As far as the p7100 conversion goes, its been said here it cheaper to buy a 12v and put it in your truck.
 
Last edited:
I stick to my statement that a p-pump conversion is generally not worth the time or money. yes, the P-pumps are reliable. yes, they fuel like an oil tanker.



But the fact remains that the vost/benefit analysis does NOT favor the P-pump conversion.



Nathan's 700hp on #2 only with a stock VP is perhaps the best argument against the P-pump conversion. If a STOCK VP can deliver enogh fuel for 700hp DRUG FREE, then there's truly a tiny number of people who would benefit from the P-pump conversion (Doug being a notable example).



The VP is not the POS everyone seems to want it to be-- neither is a P-pump the Holy Grail. Guess what? i don't have to constantly see if my rack is in the right place or worry about the pump strain that the GSK is causing.



The VP is far from perfect, but seems to be quite reliable when fed clean pressurized fuel.



If anyone wants to prove me wrong about the p-pump conversion to an otherwise stock or mild truck, give me the same amount of $$ that the conversion costs. When you get your conversion sorted out, you will be quite a bit down on power per dollar than *I* would be with some Mach 6 EDMs and a B1/B2 twins setup, even after I had the head fire-ringed.



I appreciate the ingenuity and pioneering spirit it took to explore the possibility of a P-Pump conversion. Those guys who have been there and done that have spent the money to show us that it's almost never worthwhile, unless you're a member of the 800hp club. Since the 600hp club is a fairly select few, you can see how the $$ sense of a p-pump conversion tapers off DRASTICALLY as you go down in HP.





Justin
 
What *I* personally want to see is a HPCR conversion. Now THERE'S something with it all. The HPCR can theoretically fuel enough to drown a p7100, and fuel precisely and efficiently. And both engines are 24V (albeit with VERY significant differences)-- I wonder if the conversion might even be cheaper than a p-pump swap.



The thing that would scare me most about doing a HPCR sway is getting the electronics sorted out!



I predict that within 3 years, we will see 1000 hp from a HPCR truck.



Justin
 
Originally posted by MD500E

If money was not an issue I would be convert my truck in a second!



Heck if $$$ where no object I would have, among other things, two trucks. One to drive all the time and a 24v P-pumped, twin turboed, No2 injected fire breathing monster... :D



I think it comes down to this. If you have the $$ and you can afford to spend the time tuning you can have a real powerfull truck. But for the average guy a 24v will work just fine.





JR2
 
Justin,



It seems that you have some high emotions about this subject. I hope your taking this conversation as just an exchange of ideas.



I didn't say that everybody should want this, but I think it is the best of all worlds, power, reliablity, and drivablity. It's a known fact the P gives the best in throttle responce, and milage.



As for your reference to Nathen's numbers, first let me say there is no doubt that Nathen has worked hard for them, and deserves respect. However it is not a stock pump. By piercing the wire with the COMP box that he has it is no longer stock. The pump fuels at additional levels because of the modification. I understand that most won't have this view, but that's how I see it.



Just like the p, there are more modifications that can be made to the VP that will provide even more fuel.



As for cost of converting, I know where to get the parts for about $1500 not including the pump, which you can buy on ebay for $350. If you do all the labor yourself then you end up spending what, about $2200 after nick-nacks? I nkow people that have been through 3 VP injection pump. 3 * $1300 = $3900. To me it makes more since to put a p on there and never have to worry about it again.



Now I don't have to worry about rack travel because I do have a VP, but I do have to worry about the taxing strain that larger injectors do put on the VP.



As for 1,000hp, well lets just say that's been done, just not on the dyno, and not for public display. If you want a public display of it, just wait because there is a 24v-P that will do it within a year. ;)
 
Originally posted by CFAR

Most people quote a price of about $750 for a vp44 from www.cumminsstuff.com, at least that is what I have seen posted.



Piers has them on his website for $1750. The number I posted is an avrage number, and how much MOST bosch shops I have been to say anywhere from 1100 to 1500. :)
 
Originally posted by TxDieselKid

Justin,



It seems that you have some high emotions about this subject. I hope your taking this conversation as just an exchange of ideas.



I didn't say that everybody should want this, but I think it is the best of all worlds, power, reliablity, and drivablity. It's a known fact the P gives the best in throttle responce, and milage.



As for your reference to Nathen's numbers, first let me say there is no doubt that Nathen has worked hard for them, and deserves respect. However it is not a stock pump. By piercing the wire with the COMP box that he has it is no longer stock. The pump fuels at additional levels because of the modification. I understand that most won't have this view, but that's how I see it.



Just like the p, there are more modifications that can be made to the VP that will provide even more fuel.



As for cost of converting, I know where to get the parts for about $1500 not including the pump, which you can buy on ebay for $350. If you do all the labor yourself then you end up spending what, about $2200 after nick-nacks? I nkow people that have been through 3 VP injection pump. 3 * $1300 = $3900. To me it makes more since to put a p on there and never have to worry about it again.



Now I don't have to worry about rack travel because I do have a VP, but I do have to worry about the taxing strain that larger injectors do put on the VP.



As for 1,000hp, well lets just say that's been done, just not on the dyno, and not for public display. If you want a public display of it, just wait because there is a 24v-P that will do it within a year. ;)

Andrew, I didn't want to come off as emotional. I just feel strongly that we as TDR members want to serve the other members by giving the soundest advice possible.



I am glad you feel the the P-pump is the best of all worlds. I would disagree with your statement about it being a "known fact". It's hard to say that something that is as subjective as throttle response is a "known fact". And mileage is apples to oranges, becuase you're comparing two completely different injection systems and a 12V engine to a 24V engine and attributing the mileage difference to the injection pump? Do you have mileage data from a p-pump conversion that shows the PUMP to be the source of the better mileage?



The P-pump DOES have almost unquestionable reliability. But it is quite a bit more complex than a VP, since so many of the functions that the VP does electronically, the P must do mechanically. This makes it more flexible, yes, but also MUCH more difficult to tune. Furthermore, the p-pump can lose calibration, unlike the VP.



If you are going to be consitent you HAVE to compare a stock pump to a stock pump. If you consider a tapped VP to be modified, well then how about a P-pump with a 10 plate? is that "stock" to you? If you make an honest comparison, even a 215hp pump wont fuel much without modifications. Go ahead and draw whatever lines you wish to, but you ought to make the comparisons valid. Tapping the wire on a VP is no different than messing with plates, DVs and timing on a p-pump.



Furthermore, you cost references really seal the deal. If you... . this and that. Well, most of us can't get the parts that cheap. Most of us CAN'T do the labor ourselves. And even with your very generous cost estimates, you still end up spending almost 4 grand. You can get some twins for 4 grand.



The position of my argument is this: the p-pump conversion is not a cost-effective modification, and well past the point of diminishing returns. Thus, it's only suitable for those at the very forefront of development who are concerned with all-out HP, not with cost-effectiveness.



There are many arguments of the greatness of a 12V engine. But the p-pump conversion is an option that the overwhelming majority of 24V owners ought not to consider.



Doug is a pioneer with lots of his time and money involved in pushing the envelope. Clearly, his case is a rare one. The 99. 9% of the rest of us would not be financially ahead from a p-pump conversion in our quests for more HP.



Justin
 
Originally posted by Hohn

What *I* personally want to see is a HPCR conversion. Now THERE'S something with it all. The HPCR can theoretically fuel enough to drown a p7100, and fuel precisely and efficiently. And both engines are 24V (albeit with VERY significant differences)-- I wonder if the conversion might even be cheaper than a p-pump swap.



The thing that would scare me most about doing a HPCR sway is getting the electronics sorted out!



I predict that within 3 years, we will see 1000 hp from a HPCR truck.



Justin



I talked to a guy who knows a guy who knows a guy:rolleyes:

that does conversions on fords to cummins motors.



he said this guy just put a common rail into a ford and made it work



maybe theres a way to make the common rail conversion work on a VP motor



otherwise why not just swap a VP motor for a common rail motor

they are available



I was quoted about $6K for a stand run motor
 
wow

I talked to the guy from Ford cummins and he does stuff the new Cummins into the Fords. He said the hardest part is making the Ford gauges work with the Cummins motor !! Go to FordCummins to find out a little more.



www.FordCummins.com



I am not affiliated with Ford Cummins in any way !!
 
i wasnt trying to get any sparks flying or say that the p conversion is a must. i just wanted to see if it has been done and what the out come was. if i find another 24 valve i will try the conversion but it will be for high hp purposes. no on my everyday truck. the vp tap with the comp works for me:p but i would try the conversion in a minute i have a very good friend that has worked with pumps fo rmany years not a well known guy but he is just as good retired now. so i will try it if i can or if i find another truck like i want just for the heck of it.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top