Neat, clean and it looks well supported. Nicely done TSPowell.

Twest, it is good you brought the issue up. We all need to be reminded that before doing any modifications to our trucks we should give serious consideration to safety, durability and crash worthiness.
Your source of information though, a group of ambulance chasers, is suspect and prone to wild exaggeration. A good example is the GM saddle tank fiasco. That was a self feeding media and lawsuit frenzy rather than a faulty design. Plus we are talking about diesel here, which poses much less fire hazard than gasoline.
In this case, the return to the filler tube keeps the tank’s inherent safeties intact (ie rollover check valves, etc. ). The only negative scenario that comes to mind would be if the pump continued to run after an accident in which the filler neck was destroyed and the tank remained intact. Under that one situation fuel could be pumped on the ground where it might not have if the return was directly into the tank.
Also it can be argued that any modifications to the tank itself will likely pose more of a risk in an accident than the filler tube return does. This is because the stock tank fittings are designed to be crash worthy and keep fuel in the tank even when upside down. Aftermarket fittings do not come with ROV’s built in and depending on where and how they are installed they might be more vulnerable to damage during an accident.
One should be more worried about the popular tank vent modification which vents the very top of the tank to the filler tube, bypassing the rollover check valves. In a rollover, that vent modification will allow fuel to flow unrestricted out of the tank and into the filler tube, which if broken, will allow it to spill on the ground.
Again, nice work TS. Though neither are likely to be a problem, about the only concerns I'd have would be road debris hitting the filters and having the positive stud on the pump exposed.