Has Furd made any changes to prevent more of the same?
Keep in mind Harvey that the 466 is an expensive option over the base 6. 4 engine. The owner of an IH dealership I used to deal with constantly complained that many customers bought the VT365 (6-litre) when they should have bought the 466, but didn't want to spend the extra $. IIRC, it was about a $5K option at the time. Eventually, they did spend the money in repairs and downtime.
Now, with its 4-valve head, manifold heater, VG turbo, and massive EGR cooler, the 466 is not what it used to be.
Your fleet manager is probably a smart man. I wonder what he ordered from Navistar? A Navistar with an inline six cylinder DT-466 is a much larger heavier truck than a Class 5. He could have bought Ram 5500s which would give good service for less money to purchase and maintain.
I am aware of that. I cannot imagine how any reasonably informed person would even take a free new Navistar truck with a Sick. Ohh or Sick. For engine. A $5k option price is pretty cheap when compared to the $15k or more teh replacement V8 diesel engine that would be required shortly not to mention the lousy trade-in allowance/resale value of a V8 diesel powered Navistar.
Just say no to Furds.
I'll make a prediction here- if this 6. 7 bombs out like the last two diesels, Ford will abandon their diesel program entirely and come out with some type of Eco Boost engine for the SD series. Ford has no plans for diesels in any of their lineup in the US, despite offering them overseas.
As I had pointed out in the past, Ram will make serious inroads with their C&C trucks. Ford may have to abandon the diesel in that market and retreat to the V10, selling against the diesel-only Ram on a price point.
I think this Furd engine will not be much of a success except when used in light service pickup duty for the loyalists .
While in Raleigh, NC this week I stopped by an International dealer and they has a new vehicle on display that will compete in the 5500 (14k-19k) range. It is a low rider like a pickup.