I don't trust the published stats'. I have an acquaintance that has tested positive-negative positive-negative in the last (almost) thirty days. got tested positive went back a week later negative and repeat again and never showed any signs of infection. I doubt the negative results are published or subtracted the the positive.
Depends on which media site you subscribe to.KT, I don't know. Is there a difference in terms of accuracy?
KT, I don't know. Is there a difference in terms of accuracy?
Yes, as I understand it, in order for the rapid test to detect the virus, you have to be "riddled" with it (which depends on your level of infection and/or how effective your immune system is). This means that false negatives are common. So if you test negative, you very well could still have it, but if you test positive, you most certainly do have it.
...and this has absolutely NOTHING to do with which media site you subscribe to....not sure how it would.![]()