long
I have the 19. 5's on my 1998. 5 - they wear well- at least 2 times stock. They are tougher, carry a higher load rating, more resistant to flats. They are also heavier, require expensive rims, and are not easily available ( compared to 16 LT tires) . 19. 5's are easier to get than 17's right now. No marshmellow ride. Some like to get a ride like an F-150, I like the handling and ride associated with tires that do not readily deform. If you do greater than 50K miles per year you could economicaly justify them. I only did around 15-20K miles per year. I still have my original set (65,000miles on tires and not babied). . But at 5 years old you need to consider the lifetime of the rubber- dry rot and such. Has not happened yet. I have another truck coming- a 2004. Being I am not high mileage I may wait for the stock set to wear out and then think about it. Both my trucks are/will be SRW and the package was in the 2. 5K range when I bought them '98. If you can wear out 3 sets in the life of the truck that you use(450-600K miles) by all means a set will save you money. If you do not wear out stock sets of tires regularly (2 times a year) and waste work days putting new tires on the only way to justify as a want. If you want the best handling this side of "bling bling" 24 escalade rims and whatever expensive tires thay wrap around them, than the 19. 5's are good. These are truck tires- not "ricer chic" tires like the 24". If you tow overloaded- not reccomended here- if your DOT/troopers looks at your sidewalls to see if you are safe at the scales than one overweight ticket will pay for a set. IMHO it comes down to want-very few of us purchase based on economic need. The diesel/HO option is used to its full extent by very few on the board. Look up the tow ratings for a hemi-3500-4. 10. Do you tow heavier? Will the 5,000$ cost of the option ever be amortized by the fuel savings at your usage rate? I bought my diesels because I wanted them- that is what it comes down to with personal purchases.