That was me that started the thread a while back. The problem I ran into was the cost of the components to do this. I looked at two approaches:
First, I looked at using an electronic differential switch to sense the pressure difference at the output of the turbo and the intake manifold. This will work, but finding a reliable bleed off valve was difficult. Main reason is because of the broad operating temperature range.
Second, I found a mechanical differential switch. It was more expensive but in my opinion is the way to go because it can be turned to individual engines/conditions simply by turning a set screw to adjust differential switch trigger pressure. The mechanical switch was also more ruggedized for environmental, vibration and temperature extremes. This is an expensive switch plus you still have to buy the bleedoff valve. Also, you have to consider that differential switches are normally measuring pressures at similar temperatures. In the pressure system, the ouput of the turbo is or can be considerably hotter than at the intake. Under high boost conditions you are probably looking at 150 to 200 degrees F difference not to mention that the overall temp at the output of the turbo could go from ambient (let's say 70*F at the turbo intake) to 260*F at 19 psi boost at the output of the turbo. Think about how much the temp rise is at 40 or 50 psi of boost. Yep, you can reach 400*F. Most manufacturers won't touch these extremes of temperature with the range of pressure being so low.
You have to be careful in selecting components. Vibration and/or temperature fluctuations can cause either the switch or valve to activate at an undesirable time. Also, there are harmonic frequencies that have to be considered on both the switch and valve to avoid unwanted activations or fluctuations in performance.
You have to be careful when deciding what will make this thing work. You could use the accelerator system and trigger when lift is detected. To me that's not practical because you may not be in a zone where reverse pressure is an issue and therefore the system isn't operating efficiently by bleeding off boost. I worked an approach where differential pressure was being monitored so that when the pressure at the intake exceeded the pressure at the turbo by "X" number of pounds (remember, the trigger point is adjustable), the intake pressure would be bled off. The design would bleed it off in under . 5 seconds under worst case conditions using a 1/4 NPT valve thus stopping the "barking" or turbo reversing action.
In parts alone for a dependable system, low quantities, I was looking at three to five hundred dollars. One of the main problems is finding valves that stay seated at low pressure that will remain reliable when working under high pressure and temperature. Most of the valves of this type are for steam applications. The manufacturers and engineers that I discussed this with indicated that they would have to change the seat gasket materials for the systems to work in an exhaust environment. That's the reason for the high cost.
It is simple to do. But it ain't cheap if you are going to do it right and make it reliable. Good components are expensive for this type of work.
Hope this helps.
