The stock tires are 235/85/R16
Here is an interesting comment from rspinks
"Personally I'd be concerned about 14. 2 vs 14. 9 loaded radius. That's a 5% difference in front/rear wheel speeds in 4wd. Do you really want to be skidding your tires for 1/2 yard for every 10yards you travel in 4wd?
It's true that axle ratio's differ slightly front to rear sometimes, this is because they can't always get the exact same ratio of pinion teeth to ring gear teeth in different model axles. However 5% difference in tire diameter is almost like running 3. 55 in one end and 3. 73 in the other. "
This is what I was trying to do when I got the idea to adjust my gear ratio with different tires. Both tires are with . 1 inch in size but have a big difference in load radius.
" Toyo M55 Front tire with the following spec.
LT265/75/R16 (LI)123m, (SW)10-E, (1/32")18, (O. D. )31. 9", (SW)10. 8", (SLR)14. 2", (RV per KM)404, (Rim Width)7. 5", (Rim Range) 7. 00-8. 00"
Rear Tire.
LT235/85R16 (LI)119/116m, (SW)10-E, (1/32")18, (O. D. )32. 0", (SW)9. 3", (SLR)14. 9", (RV per KM)403, (Rim Width)6. 5", (Rim Range) 6. 00-7. 00"
Even the revolutions per KM were with in 1 rev. So how can a load radius be so critical when the actual revolutions per km are so close. Diameters are only different by . 1" It would seem to me that maybe Revolutions per KM are where I should be looking for the 5% difference instead of Diameters or load radius. Hummmm...