Wolfy, You really do like to type :-laf but I still say type out the line as written in the rrt you are talking about.
Bob
Well Bob, it's like this:
I don't "like" to type, but am willing to do what it takes to say what I want to say. This forum exists to function as an info-exchange, and the exchanging requires some thought(hopefully), some time and some words. Communication is not facilitated by anyone who proudly boasts "I can say less than you!" I can't help but notice that a great many of the points I raise go unanswered. Not-answering undoubtedly helps make one seem economical with words.
We all are "differently-abled". In my experience, the less articulate the participant, the less patience with any depth or complexity in the discussion. (That is meant as a general observation, not personally-directed. )
About the RRT.
Given your contacts, (as re-discussed in the PM I sent you this morning before reading this current post of yours), and since you have posted info about the RRT, ... I assume you have a copy.
If so, then the directions I gave you should very clearly direct you to the statement.
If you DO have (or have access to) a copy, yet you still insist that I "type out the line as written", ... consider my eyebrow raised.
I paraphrase the statement, rather than directly quoting it, because Dodge is very specific with their warnings about "re-producing" their copyrighted materials, (particularly those intended to be in-house only, ... i. e. "secret") and I want nothing to do with their lawyers (or anyone else's).
So,... I have not "reproduced' their words (and won't be baited into it

.
Neither have I signed any NDA with Dodge (non-disclosure agreement), and so I am free to share whatever info I come across, in my own words.
To quote someone we both know, ... "Either you trust my info or you don't. "
The statement is where I say it is (at least on the copy I have received from my source), and it says what I say it says.
Heres what "I still say":
When/if you eventually become convinced (or will acknowledge, if you already know it) that this is true, I will be interested in what you think of such a policy.
But I have dragged horses to water before, who would not drink,... so I won't be holding my breath.
I do understand that some horses, due to their position in the industry, are between a rock and a hard place, regarding what they are free to discuss.
As for myself, I believe I have offered about all I can about the original subject of this thread ("Dealer wouldn't... ", etc. ), so will attempt to sit-out for awhile, until/unless someone has some fresh input.
I really prefer the on-topic discussion, rather than the personality-dissection of these most recent posts.
Best wishes as usual,