I'm about to order a Tradesman 3500 SRW that will be used for a mix of unloaded daily driving (80%) and pulling a 40ft flatbed GN trailer (20%), often loaded to max trailer weight rating. The truck will not be raced or hotrodded. All 3 of my previous Cummins-equipped trucks have remained stock without a tune, so I don't foresee adding one to this truck.
While I'm willing to fork out $2700 for the Aisin, my nostalgic side says to get the G56 before Ram quits offering it. I know it's detuned and anything over stock power levels causes issues with the clutch, but are there other practical reasons to get the Aisin over the manual? Here are my thoughts about one vs. the other so far.
Performance:
I don't have any concerns about performance with the detuned 660lb/ft. of the engine with the G56. I had a 1999 2500 with the Cummins and 5-speed NV4500 and with 460 lb/ft. it pulled the same trailer load without any issues, so 660 should be fine. With the Aisin the engine has the higher torque rating, but (1) I believe it's torque limited in the lower gears and (2) there's always some drivetrain loss through automatics so the actual performance level between the two may be closer than many think. Has anyone used them back to back in a pulling scenario? Any input on how much of a difference there really is?
Resale:
I plan on keeping the truck until the wheels fall off so resale isn't critical to me. If for some reason that changes the G56 may hurt resale, but then again since it's hard to find one it may actually help it for those that really want one and can't find one. I would assume the Aisin would likely help resale, but likely not enough to overcome the initial $2700 upcharge.
Longevity:
I can replace a clutch myself, and the cost would likely be minimal unless I decided to go to a single mass flywheel, dual disc clutch, etc. All of my previous manual trans trucks have gone at least 150k miles on the original clutch. Assuming there are no issues with the stock clutch at stock power levels, I'd like just go back with the stock arrangement. With the Aisin though, I'd be looking at a rather hefty bill (at least $5k?) when it comes time to rebuild it. I'm religious about maintenance, so I'd hopefully get 250-300k miles out of the original one though.
While I'm willing to fork out $2700 for the Aisin, my nostalgic side says to get the G56 before Ram quits offering it. I know it's detuned and anything over stock power levels causes issues with the clutch, but are there other practical reasons to get the Aisin over the manual? Here are my thoughts about one vs. the other so far.
Performance:
I don't have any concerns about performance with the detuned 660lb/ft. of the engine with the G56. I had a 1999 2500 with the Cummins and 5-speed NV4500 and with 460 lb/ft. it pulled the same trailer load without any issues, so 660 should be fine. With the Aisin the engine has the higher torque rating, but (1) I believe it's torque limited in the lower gears and (2) there's always some drivetrain loss through automatics so the actual performance level between the two may be closer than many think. Has anyone used them back to back in a pulling scenario? Any input on how much of a difference there really is?
Resale:
I plan on keeping the truck until the wheels fall off so resale isn't critical to me. If for some reason that changes the G56 may hurt resale, but then again since it's hard to find one it may actually help it for those that really want one and can't find one. I would assume the Aisin would likely help resale, but likely not enough to overcome the initial $2700 upcharge.
Longevity:
I can replace a clutch myself, and the cost would likely be minimal unless I decided to go to a single mass flywheel, dual disc clutch, etc. All of my previous manual trans trucks have gone at least 150k miles on the original clutch. Assuming there are no issues with the stock clutch at stock power levels, I'd like just go back with the stock arrangement. With the Aisin though, I'd be looking at a rather hefty bill (at least $5k?) when it comes time to rebuild it. I'm religious about maintenance, so I'd hopefully get 250-300k miles out of the original one though.