Another interesting talk video:
Not gonna watch “press releases”.
Show us the difference in steady-state MPG (at 60-MPH on cruise to remove aero resistance).
There are no relevant “tests” without fuel burn data while under a load.
There also aren’t locations in the US where driving a little distance to test terrain can’t be made as altitude difference is a calculation. Humidity & ambient temp is the only difficulty
past traffic volume which means a test starting at 2300 and finishing before 0800 while rural.
Charlotte to Atlanta is difficult. But from either of those cities are Interstate routes where conditions are better.
Same is true for Detroit, NYC, Chicago and Los Angeles.
A mix of Interstate and US Highway for steady-state with some minor grades; and then Stop/Go thru-the-gears accel/decel events (dead-minimal brake use).
IOW, it ain’t “discussion”, it’s advertising.
The trans has commercial applications,
so where’s the beef? The engineer's data the fleets want to see.
Then your casual side-by-side “test” as above; 6 vs 8 simultaneously.
What do y’all think? 26k GCW? That’d satisfy me as to potential with a GN load lower than cab height given trying for applicability cross-continent with conditions noted. (As it’s the percentage difference which matters).
The maroons doing “discussion” and “testing” are insultingly bad, overall. Any vehicle, (etc.)
The Ike Drooler “Test”.
The VVT 6.7L CTD
doesn’t need more than six speeds to be efficient under a load. It’s the emissions programming which does.
Where’s the money in my pocket to offset an even higher CPM Ownership Cost (by way of reduced Operating Cost)?
Engineer Data example
6 vs 8 example of data derived display
“Well, I’ll never have to earn a living with a pickup I own”.
Proverbs 19:21
You’re reading this and believe “coincidence” of that fact doesn’t exist? SHTF ain’t just a debate proposition. Buy, sell, trade at distance to keep family afloat with needed goods is serious stuff.
Make the wrong equipment choices
. . and just getting home becomes the trial. Which didn’t mean a broken truck. Expense vs Profit is all kinds of factors.
Be as good as this commercial hauler who understands profit vs expense down to how much change from the last dime. THAT is the goal with major equipment changes.
(Pic cracks me up as it’s perfect).
.