My particular use would be most likely for black bear. After two years in TN i'm just not happy. I miss mountains, cold air, and most importantly big deer. I'm moving to Utah this summer after school and plan on getting back in the mountains. I carried a . 44 for black bear when hunting CA mountains. Out of all the days in the woods (10 years) I encountered a bear once, we looked each other in the eye for about a second and he split.
But it's always so much fun to buy another gun, isn't it???
You get so many recommedations on a forum such as this.
Bottom line is it's better to have something rather than nothing.
Reports have been available for almost ANY caliber as long as the shooter can do their part.
Bigger is better.
You've got a good gun, get a good bullet (Buffalobore or Garretts) and I think you'll be as good as one can be without a bigger gun (Rifle).
Good luck and good hunting.
I deer hunt with with my 1895 in high country and 336 in low country, my real question is on archery hunts. I'm happy carrying the . 44 but I was curious if it's more effective to have more lead to sling? Mt. Lion can be just as much an issue, although they usually jump right on your head and you don't get a chance to do much.
As far as Grizz go, i'm quite confident that if charged by one i'd soil myself and get about 2 seconds into a Hail Mary before I was torn to shreds.
I think I may just hang onto the Tracker since I already have it, but I thought a heavy semi-auto might fare better. I'd hate to have to buy another gun:-laf