Bertram65 said:Maybe... but they would have to pull the engine to drop the pan, maybe they did, I just highly doubt it.
Coolslice said:I actually saw this part, held the bearing and the motor had NOT been taken out. I thought I made it pretty clear that my info was not detailed, second hand, and I HAD actually debated not posting it for this very reason. . Due to my lack of my in-depth knowledge of the internals of the engine I would not speculate on causes. I'm sorry if you feel that I don't have anything better to do then to make up BS stories and waist peoples time. . Officer Bertram65, I can PM you with some contact numbers if you want to investigate the matter further to satisfy yourself that I have not lied to you.
Coolslice said:I actually saw this part, held the bearing and the motor had NOT been taken out. I thought I made it pretty clear that my info was not detailed, second hand, and I HAD actually debated not posting it for this very reason. . Due to my lack of my in-depth knowledge of the internals of the engine I would not speculate on causes. I'm sorry if you feel that I don't have anything better to do then to make up BS stories and waist peoples time. . Officer Bertram65, I can PM you with some contact numbers if you want to investigate the matter further to satisfy yourself that I have not lied to you.
rbattelle said:Coolslice, was the transfer case and transmission removed?
-Ryan
CATCRACKER said:JHMO
bullstuff
EBottema said:Hopefully DC will install 2 new 12V engines in these trucks. They won't die at 17 miles.![]()
rbattelle said:Coolslice,
For the record I don't think you're a liar at all. In fact I think you're a pretty reliable guy.
I checked my 2003 FSM and it says engine removal is not necessary for oil pan removal, but the transmission is supposed to come out.
-Ryan
EBottema said:Hopefully DC will install 2 new 12V engines in these trucks. They won't die at 17 miles.![]()