AH64ID
TDR MEMBER
Why not get a 3500 SRW? Essentially the same truck with higher ratings. It's not any more capable, just has more capacity on paper.
Dodge did announce that the GCWR's won't change for SRW trucks, but it does appear that a 3/4 4. 10 truck will get a 2K bump in GCWR, otherwise the SRW trucks appear unchanged.
I fully agree, a 2500 SRW should be a 9,900 GVWR, and a 3500 SRW should be 11,400 GCWR, with the current front axle. I also think they really need a 6,000 FAWR and the 3500 SRW GVWR should go up a little with that. 2500 should stay below 10,000 as 10,000 is the weight mark for mulitple states for weigh stations and the like. . Not that people with over 10K are stopping in a personal truck, but just a thought.
Dodge did announce that the GCWR's won't change for SRW trucks, but it does appear that a 3/4 4. 10 truck will get a 2K bump in GCWR, otherwise the SRW trucks appear unchanged.
I fully agree, a 2500 SRW should be a 9,900 GVWR, and a 3500 SRW should be 11,400 GCWR, with the current front axle. I also think they really need a 6,000 FAWR and the 3500 SRW GVWR should go up a little with that. 2500 should stay below 10,000 as 10,000 is the weight mark for mulitple states for weigh stations and the like. . Not that people with over 10K are stopping in a personal truck, but just a thought.