dandlwiley - re-read my last post.
I suspect that the key issue isn't the strength of the 48RE but the controlling software and the sensors needed to feed data to the software.
My speculation is that the combination simply isn't working in the manner that they want it to: it isn't a seamlessly automatic interface.
If their goal is to have the computer handle everything, that would, indeed, mean major changes in the software and might require some kind of sensor to determine how much retarding force is being applied to the transmission [for the protection of the transmission as well as to let the computer determine when to downshift so as to maximize the effectiveness of the E-brake].
As it is, I wind up driving mine more like a manual - downshifting @ ~1800-2000 RPM - than like many would drive an automatic.
I suspect that the key issue isn't the strength of the 48RE but the controlling software and the sensors needed to feed data to the software.
My speculation is that the combination simply isn't working in the manner that they want it to: it isn't a seamlessly automatic interface.
If their goal is to have the computer handle everything, that would, indeed, mean major changes in the software and might require some kind of sensor to determine how much retarding force is being applied to the transmission [for the protection of the transmission as well as to let the computer determine when to downshift so as to maximize the effectiveness of the E-brake].
As it is, I wind up driving mine more like a manual - downshifting @ ~1800-2000 RPM - than like many would drive an automatic.