... those nitwits that bring lawsuits against a gun manufacturer when some miscreant uses that particular product to commit a murder.
Specifically, some of the murder victims are bringing suit against Bushmaster because they made John Lee Malvo and his booty-buddy John Mohammed's rifle.
The product was not a custom job. It was "off the rack".
Nobody from Bushmaster ever met these two clowns.
Nearest we, the general public can tell, their product functioned perfectly. The defect was in the choice of targets, and that was M&M's decision.
While we're at it, let's make sure we sue GM... It was, after all a big blue Chevy, right?
Were they both wearing shoes? We should then, sue Nike, Reebok, or whomever.
How'bout socks? No respectable miscreant shooter goes around with shoes, but no socks. Make sure the plaintiff owns a big piece of Hanes underwear, Stanley tool (they needed a holesaw for that trunk lid, you know, so OBVIOUSLY the tool company's partially to blame)
Were there any McDonald's or similar fast-food wrappers in the vehicle? Can't shoot good if you've got the hypoglycemic shakeys.
I don't recall if there was a scope or if he/they used the aperture sight. . might better sue them, too.
And the maker of the screwdriver used to mount said scope.
And all the makers of screwdrivers that were NOT used.
They may or may not have purchased tires for the car, but, those tires were there, at the scene of every shooting. Sue Michelin, or Goodyear, or whomever's trademark appears on the sidewalls.
Is there no end to the sheer, unadulterated money-grubbing in this country?
When I grow up, I wanna be a hermit. I can't stand any of y'all bar-stewards, any more. :need a "disgusted with whole thing" smiley here:
Specifically, some of the murder victims are bringing suit against Bushmaster because they made John Lee Malvo and his booty-buddy John Mohammed's rifle.
The product was not a custom job. It was "off the rack".
Nobody from Bushmaster ever met these two clowns.
Nearest we, the general public can tell, their product functioned perfectly. The defect was in the choice of targets, and that was M&M's decision.
While we're at it, let's make sure we sue GM... It was, after all a big blue Chevy, right?
Were they both wearing shoes? We should then, sue Nike, Reebok, or whomever.
How'bout socks? No respectable miscreant shooter goes around with shoes, but no socks. Make sure the plaintiff owns a big piece of Hanes underwear, Stanley tool (they needed a holesaw for that trunk lid, you know, so OBVIOUSLY the tool company's partially to blame)
Were there any McDonald's or similar fast-food wrappers in the vehicle? Can't shoot good if you've got the hypoglycemic shakeys.
I don't recall if there was a scope or if he/they used the aperture sight. . might better sue them, too.
And the maker of the screwdriver used to mount said scope.
And all the makers of screwdrivers that were NOT used.
They may or may not have purchased tires for the car, but, those tires were there, at the scene of every shooting. Sue Michelin, or Goodyear, or whomever's trademark appears on the sidewalls.
Is there no end to the sheer, unadulterated money-grubbing in this country?
When I grow up, I wanna be a hermit. I can't stand any of y'all bar-stewards, any more. :need a "disgusted with whole thing" smiley here: