OH, I dunno - my $200 Sony does OK on closeup!



Originally posted by Gary - KJ6Q
The ony other likely explanation for the physical arrangement of the fingers, would be that the resistance material they drag upon is made of a MUCH harder material than typical similar devices - tho' the significant grooves worn into the surface of that material would seem to void that theory...
Originally posted by WadePatton
There is a setting on my $150 camera for closeups. It is a two-position switch. Normal wide-angle is indicated by a Mountain symbol. Close-up is indicated by a Flower symbol. SEEF you can find that switch.
I got an APPS code--that's why I'm here.
Fingers installed wrong, but not easy to detect by quality control--my take.
Originally posted by Gary - KJ6Q
OK, assuming that the PRIMARY point of failure on these IS the finger arrangement, not that difficult to fix - simply fabricate a new contact point that is properly designed for minimal rear, solder or otherwise attach it to the poorly designed one so it now travels on an unworn part of the carbon path, and reassemble the dern thing - and THERE'S the problem - we really need to arrive at the best and easiest way to get one apart so it CAN be repaired and reassembled, and still be usable over a decent lifespan...
We badly need some donor units to experiment on...