Here I am

Banks High Ram or ATS

Attention: TDR Forum Junkies
To the point: Click this link and check out the Front Page News story(ies) where we are tracking the introduction of the 2025 Ram HD trucks.

Thanks, TDR Staff

Thanks to Lloyd at Mid-Atlantic

Throttle sensor???

Status
Not open for further replies.
My $.02

I have the ATS,. . that's not to say anything about the Banks except I just don't like the way they do business some times. Anyway, ATS has a dyno chart on their web site which demonstrates a hp improvement from flow.



Here is my thought on this issue,... it is much like a venturi on a carb in that when it narrows it speeds the flow of air,... . in this case vs fuel with the carb, and that is caused because after it narrows it then opens into a larger opening. It works on a carb so why not in this case? Additionally a selling point in my case was the predrilled and tapped fittings for NOS &/or Water/meth. It was just a convenience thing and on a personal note I felt the ATS was better looking,... how much hp is the better looking part?? :D



Just some thoughts.
 
yeah, i ahve been thinking about running NOS here and there... BUT in the end it would cost me less to buy a new turbo because i could never EVER keep the NOSoff... and that gets expensive FAST!!
 
i'll be doing some before/after dyno testing on the 9th of december with an intake that is similar to these. i will post results if anyone is interested.



dave
 
p-Bar said:
How restrictive do you think those bolts are blocking the air flow on those aftermarket units? And did they just create a larger heat sink?



Thats the thoery that the "swanker intake" uses. It does not have those in the air path but does have a smooth flow...
 
Last edited:
I really like the Swanker design intake better than banks or ATS... Simple design. I will reach out to them and get an idea of price and availability...
 
I bought the CFM plus manifold, and it turned out to be made out of high temp plastic, so I sent it back. I think I will try the ATS in the future
 
WUnderwood said:
I bought the CFM plus manifold, and it turned out to be made out of high temp plastic, so I sent it back. I think I will try the ATS in the future



Why would you want to use "caveman" technology, all those aluminum intakes are is a larger heat sink with bolts going through the air passage. You would probably be better off painting your stock one red :-laf
 
p-Bar said:
Why would you want to use "caveman" technology, all those aluminum intakes are is a larger heat sink with bolts going through the air passage. You would probably be better off painting your stock one red :-laf



I was thinking of painting it pink, but...
 
WUnderwood said:
I bought the CFM plus manifold, and it turned out to be made out of high temp plastic, so I sent it back. I think I will try the ATS in the future



Guys I would like to help you all understand why we at CFM+ say "The Ultimate Intake Manifold for the Cummins Diesel" and "Highest & Coolest Flow". These two things are not achieved with standard processes, materials or designs.



The CFM+ Manifold flows 15% more air than an ATS on a precision flow bench, 20% more than Banks and 44% more than the stock manifold under the same exact parameters. This is why flow benches are important to understanding apples to apples comparisons of individual components within a complex system and dyno claims of any entire system can be very misleading depending on the original system set-up.



The ATS manifold does have two of the long mounting studs passing thru the air flow and is one of the major reasons for its reduced flow.



The CFM+ manifold is made from advanced high temp. engineering composites that have heat distortion temps (HDT) in the 500 deg F range. These materials also insulate extremely well compared with metallic materials such as aluminum or steel.



The CFM+ manifold was developed using advanced computational fluid dynamic software and is produced on proprietary patented equipment costing millions of dollars to develop utilizing the latest in fully articulated 6 axis robots and tested head to head with the competition.



WUnderwood I hope you would be willing to say we gave you excellent service and refunded your money immediately without question but you didn't even have a chance to try the manifold. Let's see if we can find a way to get you to try it. Would you shoot me an e-mail at: -- email address removed --.



Thank you all for the interest in CFM+.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I want one!! Need to stud my set up though. I have a 3 inch spacer between the intake and grid heater due to my bodylift. .
 
Last edited:
There's absolutely nothing wrong with plastic intakes. Heck most all factory intakes are plastic and they even have coolent passages. I'm into LSX (Camaro/Vette engines) and plastic is they way to go on theos engines. The FAST intakes are the ticket and they are ABS.



I'm not familiar w/ the CFM+ products but I'm just saying that you shouldnt discredit their intake because its made of ABS. .
 
CFM+ TECH said:
Guys I would like to help you all understand why we at CFM+ say "The Ultimate Intake Manifold for the Cummins Diesel" and "Highest & Coolest Flow". These two things are not achieved with standard processes, materials or designs.



The CFM+ Manifold flows 15% more air than an ATS on a precision flow bench, 20% more than Banks and 44% more than the stock manifold under the same exact parameters. This is why flow benches are important to understanding apples to apples comparisons of individual components within a complex system and dyno claims of any entire system can be very misleading depending on the original system set-up.



The ATS manifold does have two of the long mounting studs passing thru the air flow and is one of the major reasons for its reduced flow.



The CFM+ manifold is made from advanced high temp. engineering composites that have heat distortion temps (HDT) in the 500 deg F range. These materials also insulate extremely well compared with metallic materials such as aluminum or steel.



The CFM+ manifold was developed using advanced computational fluid dynamic software and is produced on proprietary patented equipment costing millions of dollars to develop utilizing the latest in fully articulated 6 axis robots and tested head to head with the competition.



WUnderwood I hope you would be willing to say we gave you excellent service and refunded your money immediately without question but you didn't even have a chance to try the manifold. Let's see if we can find a way to get you to try it. Would you shoot me an e-mail at: -- email address removed --.



Thank you all for the interest in CFM+.



Sounds like some pretty good customer service. :--)



Im sure the intake flows more, but will it make a difference on the dyno? For me that is all that matters, for some it doesnt.



That is where everyones argument lyes. Once I get to 800+hp I will be giving CFM+ a call, untill then for the money I will spend it on big power adders.



Just my 2 pennies. :D
 
Last edited by a moderator:
BigDan said:
There's absolutely nothing wrong with plastic intakes. Heck most all factory intakes are plastic and they even have coolent passages. I'm into LSX (Camaro/Vette engines) and plastic is they way to go on theos engines. The FAST intakes are the ticket and they are ABS.



I'm not familiar w/ the CFM+ products but I'm just saying that you shouldnt discredit their intake because its made of ABS. .



Big Dan:

Don't know what FAST makes their gas engine manifolds out of but for the performance diesel market ABS wouldn't be good. The advanced engineering composite the CFM+ is made out of has much higher temp and strength.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top