Hello all. New member, first post.
I'm taking my 17 Ram in to dealer for some recalls (ecm reflash, drag link, tailgate latch) in the a.m. and I have the dreaded turbo actuator codes. With 53xxx miles I obviously have power train warranty but none on the electronics. I spoke with the service manager in depth and he stated he's had dozens of actuator failures, but only 2 or 3 actual turbo failures. He also said the new actuator is $2K plus labor.
I see a lot of recommendations to always use the exhaust brake as a way to keep the blades clean and avoid future problems. Logic would lead me to conclude that a mechanical failure in the turbo actually causes the actuator failure and should be covered under the PT warranty.
My big question is: Has anyone successfully argued that the VGT being stuck is what caused the actuator failure and thus gotten warranty coverage.
I'm taking my 17 Ram in to dealer for some recalls (ecm reflash, drag link, tailgate latch) in the a.m. and I have the dreaded turbo actuator codes. With 53xxx miles I obviously have power train warranty but none on the electronics. I spoke with the service manager in depth and he stated he's had dozens of actuator failures, but only 2 or 3 actual turbo failures. He also said the new actuator is $2K plus labor.
I see a lot of recommendations to always use the exhaust brake as a way to keep the blades clean and avoid future problems. Logic would lead me to conclude that a mechanical failure in the turbo actually causes the actuator failure and should be covered under the PT warranty.
My big question is: Has anyone successfully argued that the VGT being stuck is what caused the actuator failure and thus gotten warranty coverage.