Here I am

Better winter performance though REDUCED air intake flow!!

Attention: TDR Forum Junkies
To the point: Click this link and check out the Front Page News story(ies) where we are tracking the introduction of the 2025 Ram HD trucks.

Thanks, TDR Staff

Stanadyne Heated Filter? (or other)

Small charger twins lag-- not what we think?

While I had my 96 I was always fighting a cycling thermostat so I spent most of the time with the rad covered. Problem was if I didn't leave a hole in the middle for air to pass through the fan would run all the time. How do you guys get around this problem? Remove the fan?



-Scott
 
I personally wouldn't do this and admittedly, my reasons may not be valid as I'm relying on my experience with jets here...

A diesel engine needs air for two purposes. Combustion and cooling. The engine will take whatever air it needs for combustion regardless of the total air available. Remaining air will be used for cooling... if combustion needs go up, air willl be borrowed (prolly not the best word) from cooling air. My point is that the combustion needs are dictated by throttle or more accurately, fuel which changes with throttle. Adding an "air" orifice (which is essentially what you're accomplishing), won't necessarily net you a linear cooling air reduction throughout the rpm range because as I said earlier...combustion needs come first, and the process will take what it needs regardless of what is left over. Essentially, combustion needs will change with throttle, but the air supply will only change to the point that the orifice will let it. Confused yet?

I believe you are on to something though, but I think a more plausible answer (and one already in use) is to change the amount of fuel. The effect will be the same but the results will be linear. As an example, my Z06 has a tuning box in it called a MAF translator. It's sole function is to fool the PCM into thinking that there is more or less air than there really is. The O2 sensors in turn, adjust the fuel trims to add or subtract fuel to always assure optimum power output. I have found that I have to change the settings during winter to compensate for cooler denser air.

Having said all that, it's probably desireable to run any "box" you may have (Edge, BDDL, etc. ) on higher settings during the winter and/or, as someone already pointed out... use a winter grill cover. Something to think about.
 
SRadke said:
While I had my 96 I was always fighting a cycling thermostat so I spent most of the time with the rad covered. Problem was if I didn't leave a hole in the middle for air to pass through the fan would run all the time. How do you guys get around this problem? Remove the fan?

-Scott

Yes, fan is gone. You need the special wrench (and the fan is lefthand threaded) but it takes about 2 minutes.

Much better warmup and MPG in winter. Less noise. All good things.

Plus, a try to get the engine to run hotter, and if you do that with the fan on, the clutch locks up and you end up with more noise and worse MPG and all other bad things. A fan clutch setup for 210° temps would be ideal, but that's just fantasyware.
 
2 single best winter improvements....

Running straight #2 (with aditive below -5) and thinner oil. I quit worrying about how cold my gauge shows in the winter. I makes heat, the oil analysis is fine, drive and be happy.



I was all high on fuel heaters, oil pan heaters etc. Change to a 5W full synthetic and the slow oil pressure, slow cold cranking problems are gone.



MPG does not drop off to bad even in winter cold if you do not run #1 and do not run blend. At least down here along 194 the truck stops carry straight #2 all winter. THey have #1 and warning signs on the #2 pumps. A little stanadyne or amalgamated and things are fine.



When I hotshotted trailers back from KS, it had to be below -15 before I could leave my winter front in when towing.



BTW, I have only had my engine fan on 3 weeks over the last three two years. This also keeps what little heat generated by the engine and helps for very quick warmup.



jjw

ND
 
Well, I've reconsidered my airflow restriction idea, and I now have a different opinion. I've tested it a little while, too.

First thing I noticed after a couple weeks running restricted: more smoke. I hate smoke.

EGTs honestly weren't that different.

Overall operating temp wasn't helped much and the engine just didn't seem very happy.



So for now, I'm just taking JJW's advice. Fanless, decent oil, and go with it!

I need to call around to see if anyplace local has #2 year round.
 
Back
Top