Here I am

2nd Gen Non-Engine/Transmission CTD no more?

Attention: TDR Forum Junkies
To the point: Click this link and check out the Front Page News story(ies) where we are tracking the introduction of the 2025 Ram HD trucks.

Thanks, TDR Staff

2nd Gen Non-Engine/Transmission Rancho Shocks

Engine/Transmission (1998.5 - 2002) Lift Pump leaking

Status
Not open for further replies.
Dodge needs to get on this Cummins V-6 in the very worst of ways for the Ram 1500.



They've staked their 1500 hopes on the Hemi-- a decent engine. But the future is diesel because the future is higher fuel prices. Here in Europe, diesel is cheaper than gas, but IT'S STILL OVER $5 A GALLON! It's no accident that diesel engines are in 33% of the vehicles over here, compared to 0. 03% of US vehicles.



Furthemore, the linkage of Dodge with Cummins is so strong that if a Cummins engine showed up in a competitor's vehicle, it would do irreparable harm to the Dodge brand.



Cummins engines are in over 70% of Dodge HD trucks, despite costing $6000 or more as an option. What would happen if Cummins engines were no longer offered in a Dodge truck? Even if the M-B diesel is every bit as good, how long would it take to build the reputation and earn the following of the Dodge Cummins? Seven years? Eight?



Now what about the inverse? How much MORE would Dodge gain in 1500 sales if that famous Cummins engine were offered in a lighter, more fuel efficient package? 30mpg in a full size truck would CERTAINLY get some attention!



Let's face it-- a lot of people who buy a 2500 don't need one. Heck, I would have bought one if you could get the Cummins in a 1500!



It's amazing to me that the folks who market Dodge trucks are so ignorant as to how to sell them! They don't know their customers (witness the delay of a real Crew cab-- Yay Dodge-- finally getting it after 20+ years!), and they don't know their products!



Why is the Ford the first to market with a built in trailer brake controller?



Why is Ford the first with built in accessory wiring and a switchpanel?



Why was Ford the first with lights on the side mirrors (safer)?



Why was GM the first with the LED turn signal mirrors?





When is Dodge going to fall out of love with being the also-ran???





I love Mopars, and I'll always have a soft spot for Dodges, but they way they are designed, sold, engineered, and advertised REALLY irritates me!



If only I were handling their advertising:)



Justin
 
PaulG said:
i'm in the same boat 100%



I'd almost have to agree. Just as long as the 1500 went back to a solid front axel. I needed/wanted a diesel, but there isn't a truck offered like a 1500 yet.



If and when they make one I'll get one for a daily driver and retire the 01 to heavy hauling only.
 
I bought my truck for 10-15 years and am sticking to that for now. If the 1500 had been offered when I was looking I would have gotten that instead of my 3/4 ton, but because of epa guidelines nobody is able to build one today or at least nobody is. When 2007 comes around and if the diesel is reformulated and epa doesn't come up with more stringent polution controls on diesels, then we will surely see diesels in half tons and maybe even small trucks.

At this point I would not choose to buy a smaller truck just because of the investment I have already made. However 30mpg's might change my mind.

Some of the inovations that other trucks have are not what interests me, I don't know if I would get a crew cab, am not looking to see the bigger more powerful diesels. My roadmap is set, I wonder what will be offered in 2012 or so. A Dakota sized truck getting in the 30's would be nice. I wonder what that new 2. 7 mercedes engine in the sprinter would do in a tacoma or ranger.

Can anyone guess what really drives my buying? Yeah, I'm cheap.
 
I like the MB diesels, I have driven several mercedes with diesels for years with really no problems, but if I had my pick I would go air cooled Deutz diesel in everything!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top