For years I've thought the "Holy Grail" of the EPA is a legal way to ban all vehicles built before a certain date from being operated. The new CO2 regulation mandate might finally be the tool they can use.
It's slowly coming true. This month's Diesel Progress has a few articles about EPA-mandated retrofit of older engines in the construction, mining, and stationary power industry. How long before we're required to retrofit all our older light-duty vehicles?
The other day the EPA finished a "study" that "proved" that CO2 is a
public health threat. This, coupled with the
Supreme Court ruling that the EPA can regulate CO2 emissions, will inevitably lead to some form of taxation of CO2 emissions, and probably a mandate to retrofit or stop using older vehicles (my opinion). Remember - it's a public health threat now, just like lead, mercury, and so on.
Now think about this. According to the Department of Agriculture (
link to Wikipedia reference... bottom of page), humans release roughly 900g of CO2 per day per person. Multiply that by 6 billion people on earth and you get 2. 2 billion tons of CO2 per year. Total CO2 emission from fossil fuel burning is only 8. 4 billion tons per year (
link). How long will it be before someone draws the inevitable conclusion?
The EPA recently drafted a regulatory requirement for reporting all greenhouse gas emissions over 25000 tons per year. This includes light vehicles. For now, the 25000 ton limit means people who operate fewer than 4500 light vehicles per year don't fall under the regulation. Now that CO2 is a toxic substance - a danger to human health - how long before we're all required to report? How do you report the number of breaths you take? Will exercise be banned?
All of this is being "snuck in" under the collective nose of the populace, who don't directly feel the burden being laid on businesses. Once it's all in place for the large corporations, the road is paved for a gradual introduction to massive emissions penalties for the populace.
Ryan