raychem said:Jason... BSFC does not work that way. BSFC to be put into simpler terms is the amount of fuel required to drive an engine to produce HP. The math does not lie, it requires that for a given HP we have a given amount of fuel required to produce that hp. So a 160 hp engine requires x amount of fuel to burn( remember these are peak hp we discuss here to keep it simple). A 325 hp engine reqires Y fuel to burn. Both these engines @ lets say 1900 rpm require to different amounts of fuel to burn to keep running since the 325 hp more is making more hp @ 1900 than the 160 @ 1900(I do not have power bands for these engines in front of me at this time). Yeah. . we could factor injectors, timing, turbos... ect but thats too many variables. Lets also remember we are talking about two different types of injection(mechanical vs electronic) one fixed and one infinatly variable.
And yes weight and gearing has a lot to do with it but these new engines are so much more efficent than the older engines.
I see you point in regards to X and Y fuel rates to make 100hp at 1900rpm and they would be different because of the differnet injection styles.
But the other point here that the CR's have less MPG is mostly due to the truck behign heavier and in 4x4 case, more drive train resistance. .
Assuming the CR's really are more efficient

I just wish people would figure this out already and stop beating the dead horse
Well, my 12 valver got 29mpg and this and that and my CR gets crap for MPG
Yeah, but could your stock 12 vavler pull the same load up that same hill faster, cooler, quiter, with the A/C on while you have your DVD playing for the kids in the back seat of a mega cab as a CR? prolly not.
