I was told that one of the trucks, that sometimes beats the Big White Enterprise Ram, made 450 hp on the dyno. Then we hear of the White making 403 hp at TST. What do you little guys make in hp if your heroes are making well under 500 hp, by the accounts we have been able to find? No wonder the mid west sled queens are afraid of the Dynojet in public
See, it is easy to get in another's face, be rude, and to say "my type of competition is better than yours, and you can't win at my game. " Lighten up, please.

I don't intend any insult or criticism of the Mitchells or sled pulling. I don't know or care what horsepower they make, but they are welcome to come to May Madness to compete at the dyno, sled pulls, etc. They have said NOTHING critical on this forum of anyone else. they take the high road, a road you would be well served by, in my opinion.

More to the point is the criticism that Hammer and Sled Puller keep making, jabbing at me and others who enjoy the dyno sport. What horsepower do YOU make, not your uncle, friend, or mentor.

Stacked-n-Jacked makes good horsepower, I imagine. I don't hear him slamming others or the dyno sport.
I drive my truck daily, hunt, tow trailers. My Ram is not a trailer queen kept in a cage for sled pulling. It is my only mode of transportation. Lawrence and Mark of Diesel Dynamics also use their Rams for commuting every day. Lawrence lives in Pahrump and comes into Vegas every day. We can't afford to break stuff all the time, for time or cost considerations. Also, the sled pulling sport gives a number, the pulling feet, that does not compare to any other track or day anyway. Even if we pulled and won, it would not convince you of anything. And, I don't feel we have to prove anything to you.
Consider the technical theory of fueling vs. rpm in a diesel. The injector flows fuel per time. It can flow only half as much at 4000 rpm as at 2000. To make high rpm horsepower, you must use higher flow injectors. The bigger holes give poor atomization, a reason for the huge black smoke clouds. Thus, you may get fuel in at 4000, but only some of it burns. Then you use 100 psi of boost to increase the tornado in the cylinder to help atomize the fuel and burn it. At 6000 rpm the situation is only worse. The time for fuel addition gets shorter and shorter as rpm increases, and the time available for burning to be initiated and completed, while the piston is positioned correctly in its stroke, is also reduced. Thus, while torque x rpm = hp, in a diesel engine it is hard to maintain decent torque (effective fueling) at high rpm, vs. what can be achieved with that injector at lower rpm--assuming decent fuel atomization.
Lawrence, Mark, and I make our peak horsepower in the stock rpm range. This is consistent with the above discussion, and also much more reasonable and practical for street driven, everyday vehicles. It is not our intent to compare them with race-only setups, and their customers mostly seem to drive their trucks to their shop anyway.
I know you guys love the Enterprise philosophy and approach. That is fine. Others have different goals and approaches and I wish you would give them some consideration. Come to May Madness and show us what you got, if you really think all that noise and smoke makes over 450 hp.

We'd love to see it and learn what we can. I enjoy learning about my Cummins engine, and I use the dyno to tell me what works and what doesn't. If you are really happy with 300-450 horsepower, because it is the right range for traction on a dirt surface, that is fine too.