WELL, Tom - not to hijack - but newspaper conditions on the left coast must be LOTS different than over here on the RIGHT coast!
For absolute certain, the non-union newspaper workers here make LOTS less than their union "brothers" - I retired from a medium sized daily paper as Production Manager in '96 - thru the years, I had worked a stereotyper, pressman, platemaker, cameraman - eventually became press foreman, and later, Production Manager in full charge of all typesetting, camera/platemaking, pre-press and pressroom - with some overlap into the mailroom.
At NO time in those years, did
anyone in our plant - 40 miles from the S. F. Bay area - even come close to union pay or benefits - my own management position paid roughly the same as a journeyman union pressman. Oh, and yes, I had LOTS of contact with other state newspaper managers and workers thru the California Newspaper Association - so was very familiar with the industry throughout the state.
The printers union (like most other unions!) has traditionally fought ANY attempts at transition to modern technology - ever hear of "remake" - where advertisements submitted by advertisers in mat form - a rapid and efficient method of ad production - were REQUIRED by the union to be totally remade in the older less efficient piece-by-piece method - then proofed for accuracy - then DUMPED into the recycle bin - ALL to "protect" the union workers against their jobs being obsolete - and artificially, radically driving up the newspaper's cost of operation?
Like the automotive industry discussed here in this thread, the newspaper industry has faced union opposition to virtually EVERY attempt to streamline their operations for more efficient and profitable return of investment - all in the name of "protecting" their members. Wonder how "protected" the newspaper workers will feel when, like our domestic automakers, the doors close, and their inflated paying jobs disappear because they can't compete with the more efficient non-union ones?
