Here I am

Gray Davis, the ACLU, and the 9th "Circus" Court ... ??

Attention: TDR Forum Junkies
To the point: Click this link and check out the Front Page News story(ies) where we are tracking the introduction of the 2025 Ram HD trucks.

Thanks, TDR Staff

Internet connection and Ethernet Card?

Interesting..........

Gone to jail for what?????? Doing what is constitutionally protected???? He was not FORCING anyone to live by them, or even read them, they were simply there.
 
Because they ruled on something they had minimal jurisdiction over???????? The judges should have simply dismissed the case, the petitioner could not show how they were harmed. Another case of making law, not interpreting the law
 
Whadaya mean, minimal jurisdiction? Federal Courts have been interpreting the Constitution and such since the early 1800's. That includes disputes directly involving State Supreme Courts. Our system is set up such that a Federal Court is above the State Courts in matters of constitutionality. And Justice Roy came right out and said he wasn't going to follow the court order - a very plain case of contempt of court. You go into the lowest traffic court in the smallest jurisdiction in this country and tell a judge you aren't going to follow his order - you won't even have to go on TV to do it before he sticks you in jail.

This isn't making law, it's interpreting it. Since the Framers of the Constitution weren't nice enough to build time machines to the future so they could make the Constitution match EVERY possible future advance, we have courts to interpret what they meant and match it up against the current law of the land.
 
Ioncray

The U. S Supreme Court has the commandments etched in stone at the top of the interior of their court.

Gray will be out and the vote to remove him will not be close.

By giving illegals driver license's they will be eligible to vote! You can do it at our DMV. The license is a valid "passport" to travel in the U. S.

Bad news for our war on terror.
 
Last edited:
You missed my point lonner!!!!!! Someone had to file suit. It is my understanding, and I could be wrong, that for a federal suit to move forward, the person filing must show HOW they were harmed. The granite block was in the lobby, the Judge did not MAKE anyone read them, bow down to them, or recite them. How was anyone harmed???????



The constitution states that the government will not declare ANY religion that of the countries. They will NOT support one over another or favor one or another. Most judo-christian religions follow these basic biblical principals. The country was founded with Christianity as it's base (could not think of a better word).



And as another (thanks AKAMAC) stated, the commandments are etched in stone at the Supreme Court. Where did the court order originate from???? Some federal judge trying to MAKE law instead of interpret law... ..... :confused: .
 
DMV

If the 9th wants to do somethingconstructive, it can slap down this illegal alien driver license nonsense. Michael Savage called the California DMV the Department of Mexican Voters! What a hoot! Sadly, he may be right. :mad:
 
For those who are thinking of bailing out on McClintock, read this first. When you vote AGAINST what you DON'T like instead of FOR what you DO like, you wind up getting shafted.



"Conservatives have a chance to make history in California by electing a replacement for liberal Gray Davis. For the first time in decades, movement conservatives have a real chance to elect one of their own to lead the largest state in the nation.



California, for good or ill, leads the nation in many ways -- if a conservative were to win the recall election, it would strike a blow against liberalism for decades and act as an earthquake causing shockwaves across the political landscape of the entire country.



As you know, in the circus that is the California recall election there are many candidates. But only one conservative-



State Senator Tom McClintock. <http://www.tommcclintock.com/resources/conshq.cfm>



I've known of Senator McClintock for years; he's a good man- and a solid conservative. He has fought to cut taxes, limit the size and scope of government and fought to protect and support California families.



You've heard a lot in the media about the California race and the pressure on Senator McClintock to step aside to allow a famous actor to carry the Republican mantle in the recall election.



But what mantle does the famous actor actually carry?

He supports the right to abortion.

He supports gay adoption.

He refuses to pledge NOT to raise taxes.



In contrast, Tom McClintock <http://www.tommcclintock.com/resources/conshq.cfm> has always fought for the protection of the innocent, strong traditional family values and not only has pledged to never raise taxes, but also to drastically cut government.



You and I cannot allow a social liberal like Arnold Schwarzenegger to be anointed as the Republican nominee in this important election.



In the past few weeks, Senator McClintock has seen his poll numbers rise from almost zero to just a few points behind Schwarzenegger.



If he doesn't win, it will be for one reason and one reason only: the lack of financial resources.



Money.



Please help Tom McClintock build the campaign he needs to challenge Arnold by sending the largest contribution you can today. He's set up a special webpage for members of ConservativeHQ and the 60 Second Activist club at http://www.tommcclintock.com/resources/conshq.cfm



If you and people like you can help Senator McClintock with your most generous contributions, together we could change this country.



Right now is the most crucial time to be involved. McClintock and Schwarzenegger will meet for their first and only debate tonight - and the media will be focused on McClintock and how successful he can be raising funds as a barometer of his support.



Every dollar today is worth much more than a dollar in two weeks, or two days.



Forward this invitation to all your conservative friends and family to help seize this historic opportunity.



Thank you for all you do in the cause of freedom.



Sincerely,



Richard Viguerie



p. s. If Tom McClintock had the resources that the other candidates have, he would be the next governor of California. Please consider helping today by clicking here <http://www.tommcclintock.com/resources/conshq.cfm> or by forwarding this email to everyone you know that cares for the cause of liberty. "
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Yup - the Ten Commandments are on the Supreme Court - in HEBREW! Along with a number of other things that have contributed to modern law. Plus they are high up in the air, not down on the ground. This nation is great because religion has, for the most part, been kept in churches and not courthouses.

I agree about the CA Driver's license issue - my position on illegal aliens is further to the right than most of my views.

I still believe America was founded with fear of religion as it's base.

No offense to Senator McClintock, but he doesn't stand a snowball's chance of winning unless Arnold falls down a well. As I stated elsewhere on this forum, the conservatives who paid for this recall have three different ways of getting hosed - either the recall fails and Davis wins, or Bustamante wins and is more liberal than Davis, or Schwarzeneger wins and is socially liberal all along. I call that lack of foresight, but it amuses me greatly.
 
Arnold may have some socially liberal views, but he is a fiscal conservative. That is what Calif. needs. McClintock can't be elected. (period) For the good of the state, McClintock needs to step aside, he is splitting the conservative vote. If he doesn't Cruz will be our next Gov.

I have even heard on a conservative radio show, that if McClintock stays in the race, many conservatives will vote against the recall. Due to the fact that they would rather have Davis than Cruz.
 
Oh, I agree 100% that a fiscal conservative is what California needs - but it's funny watching the GOP there get all bent out of shape about his social views. This is especially true when the recall is (ostensibly) about economic issues anyhow.

And I respectfully disagree that Senator McClintock, if he had the same resources as the major candidates, would BE the front runner. Like it or not, CA is (outside of pockets like Orange County) not a particularly conservative state. It's his views that will keep him from getting elected, not his lack of money. In fact, the way this has been set up really negates the lack of money - you don't have to pay for an expensive primary or a whole year of campaigning.
 
Ah, as the conservatives point out, it says neither freedom of nor freedom from religion. But if you are atheist or deist, it is indeed freedom from religion that's important. And if you are Islamic or Buddhist or just plain don't want to be bothered, freedom from evangelical Christianity is a wonderful part of being American.

To steer this threat back on topic - who saw the debate? Did it change anybody's mind here?
 
Quote from ILLFLEM's article.

"These are the same dimensions that contribute to loyalty and commitment to the group. Liberals might be less intolerant of ambiguity, but they may be less decisive, less committed, less loyal . "



The authors also peer into the psyche of President George Bush, who turns out to be a textbook case. The telltale signs are his preference for moral certainty and frequently expressed dislike of nuance.



People with Moral Certainty, you can never trust them(sarcasm).



My definition of: Moral Certainty

Regardless of your Proclivities, Right is Right and Wrong is Wrong. There are no shades of gray.



If you disagree give me an example of gray!

And I don't mean "should I have a Tuna or a PBJ sandwich.



I hope either McClintock wins or Bustamecha. If its McClintock we get a good conservative Gov. If its Bustamecha then we get to prepare.



Oh by the way Aaanold is also pro gun control. (changed his mind on that one)



At one time Arnold would have been a good candidate, but now he has turned into a politician.



According to some McClintocks biggest fault is that he refuses to compromise his principles, that to me is his greatest virtue.



I don't care what your principles are, what I care about is that you will stand by them and not compromise. That way I can vote for the candidate who most represents my point of view.



Amendment I

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.



ACLU = American Civil (we get to pick and choose which, and tell you what they actually mean, because we know best, we are smarter than you) Liberties Union.





Gridlock is good, if something is important enough it will be enacted. Otherwise, we don't need it.



My Definition of a: Law

Something that either takes money from tax payers or infringes on the rights of tax payers.



Motto: Buy more Ammo



Hopefully this gets everyone fired up again. Ya'll are slowing down.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top