http://www.cnn.com/2005/US/02/22/diesel.pollution.ap/index.html
"Since many older diesel engines can run for 30 years, more action is needed by federal, state, and local governments to retrofit existing diesel engines to run more cleanly, the group said. "
I wonder if they consider the environmental savings that having ONE engine last 30 years vs 6 gasoline engines used up in the same 30 yr time span??? Or the 1/3 LESS fuel burned by the ONE diesel engine??? They cant see the big picture.
Probably the same mentality that promoted this "bull":
http://lists.envirolink.org/pipermail/ar-news/Week-of-Mon-20030609/001957.html
"Since many older diesel engines can run for 30 years, more action is needed by federal, state, and local governments to retrofit existing diesel engines to run more cleanly, the group said. "
I wonder if they consider the environmental savings that having ONE engine last 30 years vs 6 gasoline engines used up in the same 30 yr time span??? Or the 1/3 LESS fuel burned by the ONE diesel engine??? They cant see the big picture.
Probably the same mentality that promoted this "bull":
http://lists.envirolink.org/pipermail/ar-news/Week-of-Mon-20030609/001957.html
Last edited by a moderator: