???
Shouldn't this be titled "How big of ******* am I?" .
Shouldn't this be titled "How big of ******* am I?" .
-
TDR Magazine subscribers receive more than the magazine! You also gain additional forum privileges!
Details here: TDR Privileges
Subscribe to TDR Magazine here: https://www.tdr-online.com/
How conservative/liberal are you?
- Thread starter Pit Bull
- Start Date
Attention: TDR Forum Junkies To the point: Click this link and check out the Front Page News story(ies) where we are tracking the introduction of the 2025 Ram HD trucks.
Thanks, TDR Staff
Since I started the thread I guess I should clarify the meaning of the score. The higher the score the better. If your score is below 20 you should seriously consider selling your CTD and buy an electric car so you can drive quietly out into the woods and kiss a tree We sure are a fun group :-laf
so you can drive quietly out into the woods and kiss a tree We sure are a fun group :-laf
Last edited:
I thought
Here I thought the higher the score the more you should consider moving to Iraq?
Here I thought the higher the score the more you should consider moving to Iraq?
Re: I thought
I would say that you are partly correct. The higher the score the more likely you are to be serving your country in the military.
Ouch, I hope this response didn't hurt your feelings too bad :-laf
Originally posted by Champane Flight
Here I thought the higher the score the more you should consider moving to Iraq?
I would say that you are partly correct. The higher the score the more likely you are to be serving your country in the military.
Ouch, I hope this response didn't hurt your feelings too bad :-lafMore likely?
More likely to believe our little cowboy, fall for his lies, and be suckered into Iraq? Feelings not hurt, already been there, lied to, done that.
More likely to believe our little cowboy, fall for his lies, and be suckered into Iraq?
Feelings not hurt, already been there, lied to, done that. lied to
We've all been there.
Former exec that misleads us with "inappropriate" acts and also wags the dog to change the media focus. That's real political savvy that has worked on the masses since JC was a corporal.
Rates right up there with the paranoid Quaker that mistrusted even his own staff and recorded everything.
The basic philosophical differences lie in the belief that the wills should not have to provide for the will nots. Do not confuse will not with cannot.
Darwin (all we can use in the education system) says survival of the fittest. Why does our socio-economic system use the exact opposite philosophy?
Back to the test. I don't feel it really represents the true person.
Same as most posts on these threads.
my opinion.
We've all been there.
Former exec that misleads us with "inappropriate" acts and also wags the dog to change the media focus. That's real political savvy that has worked on the masses since JC was a corporal.
Rates right up there with the paranoid Quaker that mistrusted even his own staff and recorded everything.
The basic philosophical differences lie in the belief that the wills should not have to provide for the will nots. Do not confuse will not with cannot.
Darwin (all we can use in the education system) says survival of the fittest. Why does our socio-economic system use the exact opposite philosophy?
Back to the test. I don't feel it really represents the true person.
Same as most posts on these threads.
my opinion.
Human
I suppose because some of us have evolved into human beings (at least the Democrats have) instead of primate mammal knuckle dragger's, who attack without provocation. Those who cannot do get thrown into a society that turns them into will nots, even when they can. The difference is where we draw the line between help and hand out. I have serious problems with most of the welfare system, especially when you have third generation welfare recipients in this nation. But take it away now and see what happens. Survival of the fittest still fits to a point, but soon it will become the haves and have nots, and guess where the have nots are coming to get stuff.
The truth of the matter is the test that is mentioned here have no intelligent choices to answer with. Anyone who has a score above 10 has no imagination.
I suppose because some of us have evolved into human beings (at least the Democrats have) instead of primate mammal knuckle dragger's, who attack without provocation. Those who cannot do get thrown into a society that turns them into will nots, even when they can. The difference is where we draw the line between help and hand out. I have serious problems with most of the welfare system, especially when you have third generation welfare recipients in this nation. But take it away now and see what happens. Survival of the fittest still fits to a point, but soon it will become the haves and have nots, and guess where the have nots are coming to get stuff.
The truth of the matter is the test that is mentioned here have no intelligent choices to answer with. Anyone who has a score above 10 has no imagination.
Re: Human
Well I found one thing we agree on. :-laf
Do you think it's best for everyone if we contunue these handouts?
Have you ever seen the projects in Newark NJ?
I'm currently living in a house that's over twice as old as those buildings, and it's in excellent shape. Why? Because I worked for it. It was hard to get, and I want to keep it in good repair.
People have been having to provide for themselves since the begining of time. I agree that if someone CONTRIBUTES something to this country, they should be taken care of. If a family loses a father or mother while in service of this country,(fireman,police, military, etc) that family should have no wants.
If ones sole purpose is to procreate more offspring to further suck off the mother sow (USA) I for one dont think it's a contribution.
JM. 02
EricOo.
Well I found one thing we agree on. :-laf
Do you think it's best for everyone if we contunue these handouts?
Have you ever seen the projects in Newark NJ?
I'm currently living in a house that's over twice as old as those buildings, and it's in excellent shape. Why? Because I worked for it. It was hard to get, and I want to keep it in good repair.
People have been having to provide for themselves since the begining of time. I agree that if someone CONTRIBUTES something to this country, they should be taken care of. If a family loses a father or mother while in service of this country,(fireman,police, military, etc) that family should have no wants.
If ones sole purpose is to procreate more offspring to further suck off the mother sow (USA) I for one dont think it's a contribution.
JM. 02
EricOo.
Well
Well, we cannot just cut them off cold turkey and not expect riots, robbery, homicides, and most of them to come after middle America (which is fading fast anyway). I just don't think building a wall around the country club is the answer. It took 55 years to build this system and make this mess, it may take a few to get it right again. We have to get rid of the complicated system that most welfare recipients can manipulate. Jobs would be nice, but most of these people have never had a job, let alone held one. Maybe the conservatives have an idea? A little cleansing maybe?
Most of our law makers today could give a hoot less what the bill they are making is there to do in the first place. They are in it for their own area or the money it will bring to their constituents. Case in point: the prescription drug plan for seniors. They can care less if the plan does not go in effect for two more years or if the plan only covers those who have the fortitude to plow through two days of paper and several levels of situations needed to be accepted! And again you will find some that will learn the system well, to the point of abuse. That and the other half of the bill that has nothing to do with prescription drugs, but everything to do with their private causes. Democrat/Republican, Conservative/Liberal it really doesen't matter, all are in it for their own little cause. Not to serve the people, but to serve themselves or their campaign contributions.
No I really don't have much faith in any of them. We can come close to kicking a president out of office for having sex in the White house and lie about it. Which harmed only himself, his partner, his family, and the moral majority (which have no clue to begin with), nobody killed here.
Or we can stand back and have a president lie directly to the American people, the world, and our law makers. Then put us into a country that was neither a threat or a known enemy. Over 200 have died so far , and over 80 billion dollars to spend in this and no WMDs, No Saddam, No Osama, and no nukes. But, we are safer? This president is not being impeached, he is going to be questioned. Now as the stuff hits the fan, they are all pointing to the fall guy in the CIA. Before it was all their idea. All a media bliss? Yea right, I was saying this before we went in, I am not a member of the CIA, or am I?
That is the difference between party's in my book. I think a little sex in the White house is a whole lot healthier for this nation and its young men and women in the military. Pray for our men and women over there, it will be a long time until they return. 
Well, we cannot just cut them off cold turkey and not expect riots, robbery, homicides, and most of them to come after middle America (which is fading fast anyway). I just don't think building a wall around the country club is the answer. It took 55 years to build this system and make this mess, it may take a few to get it right again. We have to get rid of the complicated system that most welfare recipients can manipulate. Jobs would be nice, but most of these people have never had a job, let alone held one. Maybe the conservatives have an idea? A little cleansing maybe?
Most of our law makers today could give a hoot less what the bill they are making is there to do in the first place. They are in it for their own area or the money it will bring to their constituents. Case in point: the prescription drug plan for seniors. They can care less if the plan does not go in effect for two more years or if the plan only covers those who have the fortitude to plow through two days of paper and several levels of situations needed to be accepted! And again you will find some that will learn the system well, to the point of abuse. That and the other half of the bill that has nothing to do with prescription drugs, but everything to do with their private causes. Democrat/Republican, Conservative/Liberal it really doesen't matter, all are in it for their own little cause. Not to serve the people, but to serve themselves or their campaign contributions.
No I really don't have much faith in any of them. We can come close to kicking a president out of office for having sex in the White house and lie about it. Which harmed only himself, his partner, his family, and the moral majority (which have no clue to begin with), nobody killed here.
Or we can stand back and have a president lie directly to the American people, the world, and our law makers. Then put us into a country that was neither a threat or a known enemy. Over 200 have died so far , and over 80 billion dollars to spend in this and no WMDs, No Saddam, No Osama, and no nukes. But, we are safer? This president is not being impeached, he is going to be questioned. Now as the stuff hits the fan, they are all pointing to the fall guy in the CIA. Before it was all their idea. All a media bliss? Yea right, I was saying this before we went in, I am not a member of the CIA, or am I?
That is the difference between party's in my book. I think a little sex in the White house is a whole lot healthier for this nation and its young men and women in the military.
Pray for our men and women over there, it will be a long time until they return. CIGAR SEXING IN THE OVAL OFFICE LED BILLY TO DROP OVER SEVERAL HUNDRED CRUISE MISSILES ON IRAQ.
WAS THAT OK?
'I suppose because some of us have evolved into human beings (at least the Democrats have)"
Does this mean if I knock my girlfriend up, it makes me a human being to drown her if she doesn't fit into my future plans?
Iraq needed done, Bush has not lied to us, you are listening to your parties Liberal spin as they try to wreck the Bush Presidency in a feeble attempt to gain the White House back.
WAS THAT OK?
'I suppose because some of us have evolved into human beings (at least the Democrats have)"
Does this mean if I knock my girlfriend up, it makes me a human being to drown her if she doesn't fit into my future plans?
Iraq needed done, Bush has not lied to us, you are listening to your parties Liberal spin as they try to wreck the Bush Presidency in a feeble attempt to gain the White House back.
Ughh....back on Iraq AGAIN????
OK, I'm used to beating a dead horse.....
Iraq didnt comply to the surender agreement, or later on, the UN inspectors.
It should have been done YEARS ago, but "the cowboys" predecessor was too busy diddling the help.
Iraq had WMD's by THEIR OWN admission. What happened to them you say? Who knows. It's a big desert out there.
The fact that they didnt comply with the surrender, AND with the UN inspectors is good enough reason for me to bomb them back into the stone age.
BTW IMO, we should pull ALL of our troops home to protect out borders after this is done. I dont feel we should be the worlds police force. We cant even keep people out of our own country that we dont want to enter.
Eric
OK, I'm used to beating a dead horse.....
Iraq didnt comply to the surender agreement, or later on, the UN inspectors.
It should have been done YEARS ago, but "the cowboys" predecessor was too busy diddling the help.
Iraq had WMD's by THEIR OWN admission. What happened to them you say? Who knows. It's a big desert out there.
The fact that they didnt comply with the surrender, AND with the UN inspectors is good enough reason for me to bomb them back into the stone age.
BTW IMO, we should pull ALL of our troops home to protect out borders after this is done. I dont feel we should be the worlds police force. We cant even keep people out of our own country that we dont want to enter.
Eric
That
That would leave only the native Americans in America. I am sure they would approve!
That would leave only the native Americans in America.
I am sure they would approve! Originally posted by dseabaugh
tOOK TEST SCORED 14, WIFE TOOK TEST SCORED 10, E MAILED TO DAUGHTER IN FLA. , SHE TOOK TEST SCORED 10
I am truly sorry for you and your family.
Eric
Last edited:
With a score like that,I have no idea what you were thinking voting for Reagan. :-laf
Eric
BTW What the heck are you studying?
Last edited by a moderator:
Similar threads
Issue 128 – Digital Version
Digital Magazines
FREE!
TDR Test Drive - Digital Edition
Renew
Subscribe
Gift Subscriptions
Back Issues
Subscription Status
Address Change Form
Buyer's Guides
Ram Diagnostic Trouble Codes
The Perfect Collection
The Perfect Collection Vol. II
TSB Updates
Dodge/Cummins Historical Overview
Cameron Collection
What Makes Us Tick?
Product Showcase
Advertising
Turbo Diesel Register
Issue 128 – Digital Version
Digital Magazines
FREE!
TDR Test Drive - Digital Edition
Renew
Subscribe
Gift Subscriptions
Back Issues
Subscription Status
Address Change Form
Buyer's Guides
Ram Diagnostic Trouble Codes
The Perfect Collection
The Perfect Collection Vol. II
TSB Updates
Dodge/Cummins Historical Overview
Cameron Collection
What Makes Us Tick?
Product Showcase
Advertising
