Here I am

Engine/Transmission (1998.5 - 2002) Just a reminder about our VP44 Injector Pumps

Attention: TDR Forum Junkies
To the point: Click this link and check out the Front Page News story(ies) where we are tracking the introduction of the 2025 Ram HD trucks.

Thanks, TDR Staff

Engine/Transmission (1998.5 - 2002) NV5600 problem

Engine/Transmission (1994 - 1998) # 10 plate question

Status
Not open for further replies.
Pages that can be found on the net about the VP but the search engine is once again showing us that it can be a friend and a thread like this can be useful on the tdr.

I give credit to the Dodge ram.org site for the folowing page:







--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



An article appearing in the March 2000 issue of Petersons 4Wheel & Off Road quoted Dr. Diesel saying that the VP44 injector pump used on 24 Valve ISB Dodge diesel trucks was UNRELIABLE compared to the 12 valve engine's P7100 injector pump.



Curious about the claim, Roger Blind and Bill Alsip both e-mailed Cummins for a response. Cummins made some interesting comparisons between the ISB trucks and the 12 valve trucks. This is what Cummins had to say: Subject: 35259 :: Injection Pump Life



The 24 valve ISB engine in the 98 ½ Dodge has a Bosch VP44 electronic controlled fuel pump. The engine has an electronic control module connected to the pump as well as various sensors on the engine, the driveline and electronic throttle pedal. Service on the Dodge Ram has been enhanced since the engine electronics can be accessed with either Chrysler DRBIII or Cummins INSITE electronic tools.



The electronic ECM is designed for the Dodge application and other controls are not compatible and there are no interchangeable chips. Operating parameters are established by the Chrysler DRBIII or Cummins INSITE tools.



The Bosch VP44 electronic fuel pump has higher injection pressures, electronic controlled timing and fueling which allows precise, instantaneous control and provides greater responsiveness over the entire power range (extended from 2700 to 3200 rpm). This is a completely new engine design platform that combines electronic engine controls with high-pressure injection as well as high strength engine componentry.



The 24 valve design with cylinder centered fuel injection improves combustion efficiency which results in better emissions, fuel economy and performance. The VP44 is a radial-piston pump with 3 pistons. The pistons are attached to the distributor rotor and the fuel pump shaft.



The pistons ride inside a cam ring (think of a donut with a "bumpy" hole) so as the pump shaft rotates the piston carrier, the pistons are compressed towards the center, pressurizing the fuel. The pressurized fuel is then directed to the proper cylinder by the distributor rotor.



The cam ring can be rotated in a "retarded" or "advanced" direction; this is done using a solenoid valve, which modulates pressure to a fuel-pressurized piston beneath the cam ring. Also, the start and end of injection are controlled by a solenoid valve.



Although the VP44 has initially not been as reliable as we would have liked, we (and BOSCH) are confident that its reliability will improve. The VP44 is much less complicated internally than the P7100, and it has many fewer finely machined parts.



We don't know for sure that BOSCH considered low-sulfur fuel when designing the pump, since the pump is fuel lubricated and today's fuels are low-sulfur.



The VP44 is completely fuel lubricated, as the VE pump is. It does not use oil lubrication like the P7100 does. The VP44 is expected to last at least a long as the P7100 in normal automotive applications. However, we obviously have much more "long-term" experience with the P7100 than we do with the VP44, so our knowledge base is still evolving.



Soon after launch, the VP44 had its share of problems, just as the P7100 did when it was introduced, but we have worked closely with BOSCH to correct the issues with the pump, and we're confident that the VP44 will be a reliable fuel pump.



There are some significant differences between older trucks/engines and the newer trucks with the 24-valve engine. A Dodge pickup today can be 75 HP more powerful and almost 2000 lbs heavier than a 1991 W250; the weight of the trucks has increased yearly as Dodge has added safety and convenience features.



Also, the electronic controls on the 24-valve engine allow Cummins to control the power and torque very precisely across the entire RPM range. The mechanically controlled engines have their power and torque precisely controlled at torque peak and rated power RPMs, but between those two engine speeds, power and torque can often exceed the published figures.



Dodge set specific power and torque limits at particular RPMs for our engine, and with the electronic controls, we were able to meet them very accurately. This means that a mechanically controlled engine may produce more power and torque than a 24-valve engine at particular engine RPMs.



This is most noticeable when one compares the trucks back-to-back, as someone who trades in an older Cummins powered Dodge would do.



While the 24-valve engine itself is more efficient than the older mechanical engines, actual observed fuel economy may differ between older and 24-valve trucks, due to the fact that

the 24-valve trucks are generally heavier, the 24-valve trucks produce more useable power at higher RPM than the mechanical engines, allowing the driver to rev higher (the engine is not as efficient at higher RPM as it is at lower RPM), and the previously discussed torque curve differences may promote a less efficient driving style.



Thank you for choosing Cummins power or products. Please let us know if you need assistance in locating the nearest Cummins-authorized distributor or dealer. Please feel free to use our International Dealer Locator: (http://www.cummins.com/partserv/intro.html) found on the Customer Assistance page of the Cummins website (www.cummins.com).



Let us know if have other questions, or if away from your computer, feel free to call us (toll-free, from North America) at 1-800-DIESELS (343-7357), or 1-812-377-5000 (toll call, worldwide, ask for 800-DIESELS).



Regards,

--

Powermaster Customer Assistance Center

Cummins Engine Company, Inc.

Columbus, Indiana, USA

Email: -- email address removed --
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Does this info make you confident that your VP44 replacement injection pump will not leave you in a campground somewhere in the high Sierra's? This scenario is STUPID!! Why should we have to vacation with a 'knot' in our stomachs wondering if our Bosch VP44 Pump is going to allow us a much needed rest & recreation? I was WAY better off with my reliable '96 318CI RAM gasser 5 speed. And it even got about the same mpgs.

Bob in Sacto
 
Bob don't worry the odds are way in your favor of not having a problem with your VP44. Drive it and enjoy it. If you are concerned about lubrication use a fuel additive. I'm sure you will more than likely get several hundred thousand trouble free miles.
 
Originally posted by RobbyRam

Does this info make you confident that your VP44 replacement injection pump will not leave you in a campground somewhere in the high Sierra's? This scenario is STUPID!! Why should we have to vacation with a 'knot' in our stomachs wondering if our Bosch VP44 Pump is going to allow us a much needed rest & recreation? I was WAY better off with my reliable '96 318CI RAM gasser 5 speed. And it even got about the same mpgs.

Bob in Sacto



I'd be hard-pressed to believe your 318 got about the same mpgs. I had a 5. 9 360 prior to the 24v and the cummins gets twice the mileage the 360 got. No joke. No exaggeration. 8 versus 16.



My VP died because I killed it by grounding the comp wrong. If I didn't do that, I'd have much more confidence it would have lasted as long as I had the truck.
 
RobbyRam,

The VP44 is reliable.

You shouldnt be complaining anyways, looking at your sig you are manipulating your VP44 with an Edge Comp.

If you are looking for reliability dont starting chopping wires on your fuel pump.



--Justin
 
Originally posted by jwilliams3

RobbyRam,

The VP44 is reliable.

You shouldnt be complaining anyways, looking at your sig you are manipulating your VP44 with an Edge Comp.

If you are looking for reliability dont starting chopping wires on your fuel pump.



--Justin



Justin is right, kinda goes with the saying we have "I you can't afford to pay don't play"
 
Originally posted by kbond

I'd be hard-pressed to believe your 318 got about the same mpgs. I had a 5. 9 360 prior to the 24v and the cummins gets twice the mileage the 360 got. No joke. No exaggeration. 8 versus 16.








My 94 half ton averaged 16. 5 over 60,000 miles with the 360 and 3. 55 gears and an auto and had a best of 18 something on the highway going easy. My truck now has an average of 14. 14 with a best of 18. 2. Granted the old truck was much lighter and didn't have training wheels, but I was real happy with the mileage. If I could keep my foot out of this one it would do much better. By the way that 18. 2 on the dually was with zero highway miles probably never broke 55 mph and back roads. On the other hand how many dollars would you have to put into a 318 or 360 to make it do what a cummins will do with an edge comp? I would imagine you could buy a few vp-44's with the money.
 
OK guys, you're right, I should not complain and I should have kept my 'Black Beauty' truck absolutly stock. However, my stock milage before the 'DD 2's' and 'EZ' was a STINKING 12-13 MPGS!! And when towing my trailer, stock, was an absolute DOG, compared to my 318CI 5 speed RAM. For example, I could fly up the Santa Cruz Mountains on HWY 17 with the 318 towing my 19ft travel trailer compared to my new super-duper 5. 9L 24VTurbo Diesel. :(



And also, are you saying the ONLY cause for the failure of the VP44 is my bombs? How about a survey of those who have had VP44's that are absolutley STOCK but have tanked?



I guess I'm expecting too much, but the idea of spending over $41,000 for a new truck that ends up having numerous lift pump failures and an expensive VP44 failure in less than 100k miles is absolutely unacceptable!!!! NO MATTER WHAT I'VE DONE TO IMPROVE THE TRUCK! Pretend for a moment that this is Piper Cub Plane you just bought. :) I have not even mentioned the several Warranty repairs that I've had done to my truck. All of which, if it was an airplane, would have been fatal!!



Bob in Sacramento
 
Sounds like the truck has some issues to me. Mine will get 22+ without even trying and I would laugh at somebody thinking they could outpull me with a 318 loaded or empty!
 
Bob... no flame intended here... . the gassers have a few that are lemons also. .



yours has had a "few" problems and your now sour to it... may I suggest you sell it as it isn't going to get better in your eyes.



However MANY MANY of us have very good ones , in fact the best rigs we have ever owned [plural for many of us]... . so your constant complaining about your non fixable problems will not sway our opinions of our rigs. . but we do feel for ya.



some of us have given you good places to try to help ya out to resolve your plight, but your complaining is getting rather over the edge and starting to reduce the "feeling" of lets help this guy out.



again no flame intended.
 
I can't sell the truck, nor do I want to. Too I'm 'Upside down' in it.

But, I really actually love the truck, but hate the fact that I have to worry about it not starting sometimes, or some other stinking stupid problem most of the time!



Come on 'TDR' members! If we don't complain as an organized lobby group, and just bend over on repairs, Dodge will just continue to give us the old 'snow jobs!'

Why do you think I am wanting to be such an advocate for this web site? Well, I'll tell you.



Because of the influence of me complaining to my 'family', Dodge relented and changed their design of the power-steering pump for 2003. And we will continue to 'press' for more changes. (Very high OSHA and NTSB connections. )



Bob in Sacto
 
Hello Bob



I have never posted much but thought my experiences may help alleviate your fears.



I have owned three Dodge Cummins pickups since 1990. A 1990, 1993, and a 1999. All were bought new and the 93 had 220,000+ miles on it when I traded it in. All were stock, and I never had a problem with any of them, nor have I ever feared that they would leave me stranded somewhere.



The thing to remember is that for every post you read where someone has a specific problem, there are thousands that are using (and abusing) their trucks with no problems at all.



I know that's not much but I hope it helps.
 
Originally posted by RobbyRam

I can't sell the truck, nor do I want to. Too I'm 'Upside down' in it.

But, I really actually love the truck, but hate the fact that I have to worry about it not starting sometimes, or some other stinking stupid problem most of the time!



Come on 'TDR' members! If we don't complain as an organized lobby group, and just bend over on repairs, Dodge will just continue to give us the old 'snow jobs!'

Why do you think I am wanting to be such an advocate for this web site? Well, I'll tell you.



Because of the influence of me complaining to my 'family', Dodge relented and changed their design of the power-steering pump for 2003. And we will continue to 'press' for more changes. (Very high OSHA and NTSB connections. )



Bob in Sacto



Bob hope things workout for you. Sounds like you have a lot of stress with the kid getting married and now a truck problem. I know that this is a great forum with many knowledgeable members. I have personally sent in my emails to Dodge and NTSB about the lift pump problem that can contribute to the VP44 going out.
 
The VP44 left untouched is probably just as reliable as any injection pump. It will also give as many miles as just about any other pump. Its fuel lubed and cooled so a poor lift pump starving it for fuel will surely bring swift death. But thats not the VP's fault. True, the lift pump was a bad design perhaps, but there are easy and cheap ways to fix this flaw. One day, $100, and you could do it alot of good I believe. Its sad to have to fix this flaw, but the old saying about "if you want it done right, do it yourself" lends itself well to lift pumps. I wouldn't look for Dodge to have anykind of major redesign of this setup since they dont even sell this model anymore. I simply wouldn't worry about the VP in stock form. Tapping wires does change the rules however. Do any chip companies offer guarantees when tapping pump wires?



With those original MPG's you've stated, something is "bad wrong" as my old Mopar buddy likes to say. There has to be an explanation as to why. Adding performance is great... but if new injectors got you better mileage, even performance injectors, something was amiss to begin.



I drove a gas guzzling 360 2WD at work. It was horrible and pinged like a submarine to boot. My Cummins, basically stock except RV275's, would have made that truck look like a joke in any serious towing situation. It guzzled so much my boss demanded my next truck be a V6. I ended up with a Vortec 4. 3 Chevy.
 
Last edited:
Originally posted by turbo tim1

My 94 half ton averaged 16. 5 over 60,000 miles with the 360 and 3. 55 gears and an auto and had a best of 18 something on the highway going easy. My truck now has an average of 14. 14 with a best of 18. 2. Granted the old truck was much lighter and didn't have training wheels, but I was real happy with the mileage. If I could keep my foot out of this one it would do much better. By the way that 18. 2 on the dually was with zero highway miles probably never broke 55 mph and back roads. On the other hand how many dollars would you have to put into a 318 or 360 to make it do what a cummins will do with an edge comp? I would imagine you could buy a few vp-44's with the money.



18. 2 mpg? I'm not buying it. Guess you drove down hill both ways. Even feathering the throttle in my 5. 9, I could barely squeeze 14 mpg with the same gearing. Not flaming, just very tough to swallow.
 
nice try

There is no way a VP44 will ever be as reliable as a P7100. Its a nice thought but will never happen. Even the reman VP's are suspect. Sure, a lot less parts but the thing just isn't built as tough as a P pump... . just the facts. Now we have the '03 set-up which could prove as reliable as the P pump, time will tell.
 
I'll the P pumps are more reliable than VP44's. I'm just speaking of injection pumps in general. The VP44 certainly cant be the worst. Is it possible it could go 200-250K miles? To me thats reliable and worth many years of service. But I'll second any notion the P pumps are more reliable.
 
I personally think the VP's are getting a bad rap. They don't appear to be as reliable as the old P-pump, but neither are they unreliable in comparison to some of the other diesel injection pumps on the market, as long as the fuel pressures are looked after.



I've got several hot shot customers who are up to 300K on their original VP44s. I recently replaced one at 500 K. Most of the early death VP44s I've seen have stemmed from poor lift pump pressures.
 
Originally posted by kbond

18. 2 mpg? I'm not buying it. Guess you drove down hill both ways. Even feathering the throttle in my 5. 9, I could barely squeeze 14 mpg with the same gearing. Not flaming, just very tough to swallow.



I wouldn't lie about it. I have long since thrown my note book out that had gas purchases and mileage on that truck but I am as serious as a heart attack. The truck was a regular cab long box and just ran great. 18. 2 was with the dually but I did get 18 something with the old half ton, usually it was 16 something though. This time of year with the dually I am right at 16 something also so they are about the same. The 1/2 ton weighed 5,000 lbs or less, the dually is over 7,000 lbs
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top