Round and round she goes....
where she stops, no one knows.
Max, you accuse me of not understanding what you posted. I read your posts thoroughly and I think... no, I know I understand them. I just don't agree with your approach to this particular thread and I stated that in my last post. Please leave the assignations of ignorance out of the topic. More on that in a bit. You tell me I miss your points, I say I got them clearly. You will probably see the apple in my hand and call it an orange. You say if I don't want to debate, I shouldn't have posted to this thread. What we are doing is not debating anymore, it's called running around in circles. You will always see the sky being blue and I won't or vice versa. I bow out of topics after I have had my say, even if it isn't the last word. It's there to be read and you all get to make your own decision about what I post and therefore, by extension, what type of person you think I am. That's fine, but I will not tolerate being called ignorant when my posts most definitely suggest otherwise. Disagreement does not equal ignorance. The following is one of the points you made early in this thread:
~Germany's Third Reich rose from a country that had been devastated by WW1.
~Our country has just had its first large scale attack on its mainland... devastation.
You lost me there. And I addressed this in an earlier post, despite your malicious accusations of word twisting, ignorance and not reading what you posted. The Treaty of Versailles was imposed upon Germany by the League of Nations, which was Woodrow Wilson's utopian pipe dream cum reality. It was not an attack on Germany, rather the spoils of war by the victors. You don't have to like it, but characterizing it as an attack is absurd. Call it the law of unintended consequences and leave it at that. There are people in Germany who, although for different reasons than you bring forth here, would like to look at what the Nazi's did as being justified because of what happened at the end of WWI. They are still active today. You may want to choose your arguments carefully.
Crazy Horse & Chad Sheets -

I wouldn't explain anything you do. You're just being setup for more putdowns. What was it that Dale Earnhardt used to say? Oh, yeah - "Never complain, never explain"
jthorpe, good to hear from you. I hope all things are well with you and yours. It's been awhile since I've seen you post. All ubiquitousness aside, I must say that the most galling thing Max and some of the others, you included, have done is say that those of us who advocate the position that Crazy Horse took to start this post, don't understand your points, therefore we are ignorant, or worse - we are purposely ignorant. Purposeful ignorance is exactly not what it conveys. It is willfully ignoring the obvious to reach an end through whatever means one would feel are necessary. That is a mindset reserved for the Stalins and Hitlers of the world. Max comes dangerously close to suggesting that there are those of us on this board who, because we advocate security and vigilance, will ignore every decent code of conduct and because of our prejudices and subsequent behaviour cause ourselves and our country to end up in that most horrible of hells reserved for the aforementioned tyrants and any who are like them. I remind everyone who reads this post that Max introduced that line of thinking into this thread, not those of us who are now defending ourselves. Jthorpe, you did not say that, but you conveyed the impression that you agree with Max, who did say things of that nature. I completely and perfectly understand your points. What I do not understand is the premise. I do not know why Max continues to drive his point home, when he has basically said the same thing as Crazy Horse. Max likes to argue and goad people into debat. . uh er circle jerks... sorry! I almost Maxed out there

anyway where was I , oh, circle jerks. That's all this has turned into and I just don't want to participate in a continued struggle of one-upsmanship. Just watch how he responds to this post, especially because I went back on my word about not posting on this thread anymore. Max likes to argue. That's all I know about him, because that's all I've seen on this board. I will never call him ignorant, as he did me. I will never tell him to shut up and go away, even if I don't agree with him or like him. I don't know whether I like him or dislike him, because I don't know him. There is, however, a point of diminishing returns and that is why I chose to end my participation in this thread (until this post

, that is). I countered his points with what I believe is un-assailable logic and his response is typical: I don't understand or I must not have read his posts. But he doesn't stop there, he goes on to say that I prefer to remain ignorant, and the only conclusion that I can reach is that he feels this way because I don't see his posts the way he intended me to see them.
Translation: I don't see things his way. I don't know about other TDR members, but I quickly grow weary for intelligent conversation once I hear or read someone make comments to me in such a haughty manner. Such comments convey an air of superiority, both morally and intellectually. To me that is exactly the type of attitude that Max says he is trying to prevent us (myself, Crazy Horse and his wife, my wife and the others) from adopting. Max doesn't have to like what I say, but it is intellectually dishonest for anyone to read my responses to him and then call me ignorant. I don't know how to explain it any better than that. And I don't see how that is ubiquitous. So without further adieu, I bow out of this discussion... . I think... . yeah, I'm outta here. May you all always have fair winds and following seas - and - Watch the ice!
P. S. This post has been edited in the interests of brevity

and readability. The names have not been changed to protect the innocent.