Hi, I am interested in the Carli 2. 65 Bilstein kit. Can someone tell me how this suspension system rides on the street compared to stock? I will be running 35" Toyo M/Ts. <!-- google_ad_section_end -->
The 2. 65 is arguably one of the best all around suspension kits on the market today, hands down. However, if you are primarily concerned about street ride, there may be better options. I have one of the original 2. 65 kits. The ride on road is better than stock... but I wouldn't describe it as plush, soft, compliant, cushy, etc. It is a sports type handling feel that responds well to driver input and gives you a feel of the terrain your going over. The ride is better than stock by a significant margin, but not in the plush sort of way. The beauty of the system begins to come out as you push things. For example, find a wide open parking lot with lots of speed bumps. At a typical 5 - 10 mph, I'm not sure how much difference you'd notice over stock. Up it to 25 - 30 mph, and there's still a noticeable "bump", but you'll be a little surprised in that the suspension didn't bottom out, and you didn't hit your head on the roof. Now, take the speed bumps at 50 - 60 mph, and... . WOW!!! Where'd they go? It's literally smoother to take these hits at speed than it is under normal driving, if that makes sense.
Now, Sage has come a long way with the valving on the 2. 65s since I bought mine. From what I understand, they include softer initial valving profiles, the ACVs, and jounce stops... none of which I have. I presume, these would only make the ride better all around... on the small, medium, and big stuff!
What are your intended uses for the truck?
He said stay away from the bilstein shocks they are junk. He said the King shocks are way overpriced and the Fox shocks actually perform better than the Kings.
I'd be interested in hearing more. Why does he consider Bilsteins to be "junk"? From what I understand, the Carli crew was SUPER impressed with the 2. 65s from the start... and their expertise has only made them better. In fact, I think it could be argued that the Carli valved 2. 65s could run with ANYTHING out there and hold there own, with the exception of true 3 or 4 tube bypass shocks.
I'm curious to hear the thoughts and reasoning from your friend. But at the same time, I'm skeptical that Thuren and the Carli crew would be using shocks that are clearly inferior that Fox.
--Eric