Just for fun, I went to Radio Shack and bought a cheap 30 Amp Bosch-type relay, P/N 275-0226 to play with. Brought it back to the shop here (PLEEEEEZE don't tell my boss!!
#ad
. ) and hooked my storage oscilloscope across the coil.
First of all, the relay coil draws 180 ma @ 12. 2 volts. The coil resistance is calculated to be 68 ohms. I took the cover off it and it DOES NOT have a diode inside.
I operated the relay by unplugging the banana plug to the power supply. I measured *in excess* of -400 Volts spiking off the relay. I was surprised to see that the voltage spiked in a positive direction as well, to over +200 Volts. This indicates that the coil is 'ringing'. The voltage across the coil didn't stabilize near 0 volts for 200 or 300 microseconds. I stuck a 1N4148 diode across the coil as described in the previous post. It's just a little sucker, not a power diode like a 1N4007, and it clamped the back EMF to about -6 volts. If there was any positive excursion, it was negligible. IMHO, a 1N4148 diode (cheaper than Borscht) is adequate for suppressing a Bosch-type relay. Incidentally, without the diode, the voltage transients were loud enough to be heard on the speaker I use on the bench.
Mick2500, while an ignition coil is designed to produce thousands of volts on the secondary winding, the primary winding is also within its own magnetic field, and when that field collapses, there most definitely is a back EMF generated. It won't be as great as the engineered back EMF that is generated by the secondary, but it will be there. The condenser across the points in the distributor is there to manage that back EMF from the primary winding. My experiment with the relay gives an example of what back EMF can be generated by just a little coil. Oh, by the way, the amount of actual energy in the relay's back EMF is pretty small, but it's voltage that arcs and sparks and damages solid state stuff.
Mick, thanks much for the information on the Bosch Aux Light Relays. I wasn't aware that they had diodes and fuses built-in. Chris's question 4 has just been answered! Fellas, take note! This is why we pay more for good quality products!!
Bob, as noted above, the voltage transients occur so quickly that a voltmeter won't pick register them. An oscilloscope is the preferred way to observe these voltage spikes. Yeah, about the motors, I was on a bit of a fishing trip... I wonder what the answer is? Replaceable brushes?? My buddy at the dealership has more experience with the lift pumps than I do. I'll ask him if the motors are wet, but, in my opinion, they are not; the shafts are sealed going into the pump housing. At least, my Holley, which could be disassembled, had a shaft seal and the motor ran dry. I don't expect the Carters to be very different, except that they can't be disassembled. By the way, remember that the VP-44's bypass regulator is a banjo style regulator.
My history of diodes is a study in generalities: I'm gonna ignore vacuum tube diodes, cuz they are of no consequence to this discussion. Diodes date back probably to the 1800s. The first practical small power diodes were probably produced in the 50s. Selenium rectifier diodes were used in early TVs but were big, ugly, and tended to expire often, releasing a smell of rotten eggs or skunks. Silicon diodes became popular in the early 60s because they didn't smell like skunks. Back then, they were encased in metal and looked like a miniature top hat, with a wire out of each end. Later on, they were replaced with molded epoxy encased diodes that were much cheaper to produce. The 1N4007 fits into this category. There are also glass-encased diodes, and they are normally used for small signal and electronic switching applications. The 1N4148 I used for my relay experiment is an example of that type, and appears to be useful for our Bosch-type relay application.
The 1N4148 diode I used is smaller than a wooden match head. I could easily add it internally to the Radio Shack relay and probably will. If I do that, I will have to remember which terminal is which on the relay coil, because the polarity of the diode is important. The two coil tabs on the relay are labeled 85 and 86, and I just know that there is a documented standard for hooking them up. Anybody with that knowledge can just step right up!
On the other hand, it wouldn't be difficult to crimp the diode's leads into the 1/4" push-on flat connectors that most people use to attach wires to the relays. Just note that the diodes are somewhat fragile physically due to their small size. The diode's wires will require some slip-on insulation to prevent accidental shorts also. I've used this technique myself on many occasions. Again, I stress that the polarity of the diode is important. Get it right the first time, or the fuse will blow, or, in the case of a 1N4148, it will fail in either open or shorted mode, depending upon how much current was forced through it.
Back before cars became computerized, there was little automotive application for transient protection (including diodes) in cars. Switches didn't care if they arced a little; they could be cleaned or replaced cheaply, and the radios had tubes, and contained their own type of protection. There just wasn't much need for it. When computers were introduced to cars, transient protection became very important. Computer failures in cars are *very* unpopular due to their inconvenience and expense!
Chris, I don't know why your handbook doesn't show protection diodes, or transient protection, considering how important this is on modern computerized cars.
As I mentioned above, there is probably a prescribed method of hooking these relays up, probably to some DIN standard. As long as the wiring polarity to the coil is correct, there would be no obligation to show whether the internal diode was there or not. Outside of suppressing back-EMF, the diode is 'invisible' to the user, as it simply eliminates an undesirable trait of the relay. Does anyone have a relay that shows a diode across the coil on the little stamped-in illustration on the relay? Mick, what does your genuine Bosch relay show?
Relays are often rated so that they are universal in their applications. A 30 Amp rated relay, the Bosch-type for instance, can be used in *any* application up to a maximum of 30 Amps, whether it is Aux lighting, driving fuel pumps, or whatever. I could use a relay capable of switching 10,000 amps for my driving lights, if that was all that was available, but I might have to mount it in the pickup bed because of its size. A relay rated at 30 Amps will cover *most* of the typical automotive applications that any of us mere mortals can think of. Also, one part number gives the manufacturers economy of production, cuz they only need to build one part number. (Yeah, I know, they make *all kindsa* relays. Gimme a break!) The Bosch-style relay is the Volkwagen of relays. (sorry, I almost said ch****let)
#ad
Well, if I were running a load with a 12 Amp draw, I would tend to run toward the lower end of the overcurrent protection range. Remember what I said about 50 to 100% overrating? Well, I put that in there after considering that a motor's startup current might be high enough to blow a fuse with a 50% overrating. Maybe it would, and maybe it wouldn't. I regret that I may have added to the confusion here. A 25 Amp fuse wouldn't be out of the question with a 12 Amp load, but I would be more comfortable with a fuse with an 18 to 20 amp rating. A 15 Amp fuse might work too. You see, we want it only big enough to be able to handle reasonable overcurrents, like when a motor starts up, and still be small enough to melt quickly when an obvious fault occurs. It's a balancing act, and there's no quick answer. Start smaller, and expect that the fuse could be undersized and may blow. If it blows, then go up one more step in current rating. Remember too, that a fuse will not blow immediately with a moderate overcurrent. It takes some time for the conductor inside the fuse to heat up and melt. There are also special commonly available fuses, called slow-blow fuses that are designed to endure higher overcurrents for longer periods of time before they finally open up, but they're not commonly used in automotive applications.
Fuses should normally be placed as close to the source of power as is practical. That way, most of the wiring in the circuit is protected. For instance, if I ran a wire from the battery to the trailer connector, and put the fuse right behind the trailer connector, all of the wire ahead of the fuse would be unprotected. If a short to ground occurred anywhere on that wire, well, you know what's gonna happen.
#ad
It's logical to put the fuse as close to the source as is possible. I know, I'm starting to get redundant. redundant. I'm nearly finished!
Chris' question 8. One fuse for each load is sufficient. We have discussed sizing of fuses above, so the correct size of fuse can be estimated by either physically measuring the operating current of our load, or by using the manufacturer's advertised current draw. The manufacturer's rating is probably close enough for us. As an example, my Carter P4594 pump draws 4. 5 Amps, according to the Summit catalog. I would probably fuse it at 8 amps, and it would be OK. If I were concerned about the current-handling capabilities of the wiring, I might fuse it at 6 Amps, if that value of fuse is available. See, there's lotsa room to experiment here. Just don't get caught out in the toolies without spare fusies!!
Chris, yes, in your question 9, if you had a smaller fuse between the relay and the pump, it would have blown first, and would have prevented the 30 amp fuse between the battery and the relay from blowing. I see that the current rating of the BG220 pump is 8 Amps. A 12 amp fuse is adequate for this application. I'd carry a 15 Amp fuse in the truck just in case it isn't.
#ad
Bob, if your oil filter survives that diesel fuel without dissolving, and it seems like it does, then I guess it's all right! Another great idea!
There. I hope I've answered most of the questions. Comments and further questions are welcome. Thanks for your time and consideration.
Tom
[This message has been edited by TommyTurbosaurus (edited 05-28-2001). ]
[This message has been edited by TommyTurbosaurus (edited 05-28-2001). ]
[This message has been edited by TommyTurbosaurus (edited 05-28-2001). ]
[This message has been edited by TommyTurbosaurus (edited 05-28-2001). ]