Sage did right by his word and took this to a level of certainty and delivered some information from that process. I received forwarded email threads with lots of pictures, graphs, macrostructural analysis and some commentary. These things are coming out so strong that the lab machine fixtures broken before the pin failed during load testing of insane pressures. It's exactly what Sage committed to and it's here - for sure.
The rest the text below the headers is from Adel:
Abel and Sage created a heat treat table specific for the part and machine process and then instrument tested it in a laboratory
Hardness testing and tensile testing have been very promising so far. However, I am not done yet. I am going to repeat some of the tests on different samples to ensure uniformity. But so far everything is telling me that our heat treat table worked.
This goes with some of the pictures, I don't know to which ones though
These are cross section and microstructure of the sample that was already cut by the manufacturer. Its HRC is about 56. I had predicted case depth of 1. 1 mm; the polished cross section shows case depth of about 1. 1 mm, seen as a dark circle on the cross section at the surface of the sample
The microstructure shows about 89% proeutectoid ferrite with a balance of ferrite+cementite+martensite
Testing of the custom heat treat table is complete
Now that I reviewed the results as I sent you the emails, I do not think it is necessary for me to cut the samples for microstructural examination. I think we have enough information to decide to go with the our heat treat table I do not want to change anything lest something else gets messed up.
Load testing the final product resulted in the machine breaking a fixture.
The load deflection curve shows excellent combination of strength and ductility. The sample had excellent (very high) yield strength, similar to sample 1.
The high load required for causing these samples to fail took their toll on our fixtures. This time instead of the sample, one of the attachment fixtures broke.
There was a discoloration of about half of the threads on the shank. I believe that is where the failure was taking place. The rest of the pictures are showing the sample and its shank.
The sample had yield strength of about
55,000 lb/0. 3345 in^2 = 164 ksi (excellent!)
The sample failed at the first thread as expected.
Photos of the testing, measurement and results - in no particular order
#ad
#ad
#ad
#ad
#ad
#ad
#ad
#ad
#ad
#ad