FYI - I had access to an AFE PG7, 72-90010 filter only. It had about the same ID as the stock intake tube, so pulled off the BHAF and used a steel sleeve to hoseclamp the the new filter in place.
Impressions:
1. More turbo whine than the BHAF.
2. Slightly quicker spool-up.
3. Havent checked for oil on the turbo blades yet (which is why i disliked the k&n re-0880).
4. Not quite as "Big And Honkin'" as the BHAF.
5. EGT's seem to be about the same, but havent really been looking for the difference yet.
Have driven back & forth to work for about 2 weeks this way, and I do believe it is snappier running at low boost, and comes up on boost quicker. So far its a keeper. . I have no connections to AFE, just thought I'd share...
Your results may vary, as I havent dyno'd this setup. I would be interested in knowing the flow differences between these filters to see if they support my impressions.
Dimensions shown on box:
Flange I. D. = 4-1/2"
Base Diameter = 8-1/2"
Top Diameter = 7"
Height = 9"
Edited: Oops! Posted this in the wrong forum - Moderator, please move if necessary. Thanks. -shortshift
Impressions:
1. More turbo whine than the BHAF.
2. Slightly quicker spool-up.
3. Havent checked for oil on the turbo blades yet (which is why i disliked the k&n re-0880).
4. Not quite as "Big And Honkin'" as the BHAF.
5. EGT's seem to be about the same, but havent really been looking for the difference yet.
Have driven back & forth to work for about 2 weeks this way, and I do believe it is snappier running at low boost, and comes up on boost quicker. So far its a keeper. . I have no connections to AFE, just thought I'd share...
Your results may vary, as I havent dyno'd this setup. I would be interested in knowing the flow differences between these filters to see if they support my impressions.
Dimensions shown on box:
Flange I. D. = 4-1/2"
Base Diameter = 8-1/2"
Top Diameter = 7"
Height = 9"
Edited: Oops! Posted this in the wrong forum - Moderator, please move if necessary. Thanks. -shortshift
Last edited: