ThrottleJockey - Thanks for chiming in on the timing discussion. Your opinion agrees with my sentiments about advanced timing. Without a way to measure cylinder pressure under load conditions, I can only say that advanced timing just doesn't feel right, more responsive throttle yes, but the engine just doesn't sound good. In Hohn's defense, he has spoken out against timing advance, especially for the HO motors, more often than not. I interpreted his comment differently. That is, the HO motor is designed for higher compression, including a differently timed VP44, than the SO motor, therefore better able to handle more timing advance than the SO. However, advancing timing much more than stock on an HO motor is riskier.
I felt this way when I ran an Edge EZ, same when I went to the Comp, and the same, if not more so, running any odd-numbered SMARTY programs. The huge advantage with SMARTY is that you can run the even-numbered, non-timing programs. I really like these programs better, even though the throttle response isn't as sharp. I've tried program #9 twice and quit it after one run, both times. Even though having big low-end power is fun, I can't use it without making big clouds of smoke. Smoke is bad advertising for diesels, so I prefer not to make it. Now I'm in the process of experimenting to find the most usable setting for my tastes. One setting for daily driving and probably another (lower setting) for towing. I only tow occasionally, but in the 17-18 K gross range.
As for the fuel-saver program, which seems to have the most timing advance of all the programs, I think this would be good for longer highway trips, empty, when you are driving in an economical style (low load, low boost, low temps).
Regards,
Neil