I keep hearing this `'All new 6. 4'. It is a bore and stroke on the 6. 0, not an all new engine. In addition, it has even more emissions equipment than the 6. 0. A little reading on the Ford website will reveal how endearing the emissions equipment of the 6. 0 has been to the average Ford owner.
A personal observation: My winter home is on highway 441 in Okeechobee, Florida. This highway is about 25 feet behind my mobile home. Standing behine said mobile home reveals that about 4 in 10 diesel Fords have one or more defective fuel injectors, or is missing for some other reason. And they aren't all beat up junkers. Many are very recent vintage, some brand new. For whatever reason, there are very few Chevy diesels down here. Most here have out-of-state plates. About one in 20 of these have the same problem as the Fords. In owning and observing the Dodge diesels since I bought my first in 1989, I have NEVER heard one running rough.
I have noticed comments on other websites about Dodges ratings being worse (less) than it's competitors. Many don't realize that each manufacturer sets their ratings according to their test performance tests on their product only, and personal preferences relative to durability while towing and load hauling . Except for legal concerns about specific load ratings, there is little direct comparision between the manufacturers. As an example, Chevy used to rate a 4 banger Chevy Citation to tow 2,000 lbs. After a little digging, you would discover that only applied to a 2 or 3% grade and 25 mph in 1st gear and something like 8 square feet frontal area. That is smaller than any pop-up camper I was amiliar with. Possibly you could have towed a power pole or two, but it sure couldn't have stuck out anywhere inti free air behind the car. How many people do you think EVER travelled like that?