Here I am

The auto transmission and bindup!

Attention: TDR Forum Junkies
To the point: Click this link and check out the Front Page News story(ies) where we are tracking the introduction of the 2025 Ram HD trucks.

Thanks, TDR Staff

Grease gun hose for fuel pressure gauge

Lift Pump Pre-Filter

This is a technical article to give consumers a better understanding of a few of the recently debated arguments about automatic transmissions. As always I’m going to do my best to explain these topics using grass roots terminology so everyone can understand



First off is bind up. We have one company saying bindup is the single largest cause of failure of the Chrysler 47RH/RE transmission. We have another company saying there is no such thing as bindup because Chrysler uses snap action shift valves and it is nothing to worry about. Furthermore, it can ONLY occur if the transmission is built improperly.



Who is the uneducated customer supposed to believe? Obviously, one of these companies is right and one is wrong. I’m going to provide some technical information and let the consumer decide for himself.



Let’s first talk about the snap action valve theory. A snap valve is one that instantly pops from one state to the other with no time in between. With a snap action valve there is no such thing as a partial stroke.



Here’s a picture of the 2-3 shift valve from the Chrysler service manual. On top is the valve in the unstroked position (2nd gear). The lower schematic is the valve in the stroked position (3rd gear).



#ad




Here’s a brief rundown of how the valve cycles. The 2-3 shift spring (indicated in red) holds the valve to the left. The left most oil circuit is governor pressure. This pressure is 0 when the vehicle is not moving and steadily increase with vehicle speed. Governor pressure is trying to push the valve to the right. We have a tug of war so to speak. Each force is pushing on the valve. When the spring is winning the battle, the valve stays to the left (2nd gear). When the governor pressure overpowers the spring, the shift valve moves to the right (3rd gear). Simple enough.



But the question was, is this a snap action valve?



Let me bring in an example to illustrate my point. The suspensions on a truck or car all basically work on the same principle. Whether it’s a coil sprung suspension or a leaf sprung suspension they all work the same. As you apply more and more load, the vehicle sits lower and lower. We’ve all seen this whether it was loading firewood into the bed or watching a group of grown men climb into the bed of a truck. As each person climbs in, the suspension compresses little by little. This is because springs have a progressive force to them. As you compress a spring further and further, it takes more and more force to compress it.



Well, the exact same principles apply to shift valves. As you slowly increase the governor pressure, the shift valve SLOWLY compresses the shift spring and strokes the valve little by little until enough pressure is available to fully compress the shift spring. If at some point during this slow stroking process, you stopped accelerating, what do you think would happen? Would the valve instantly jump to one extreme or the other because we want it to, or do you think it would stay right there in the middle?



Just like your suspension doesn’t sit ONLY at normal ride height or all the way down on the bump stops. It will sit at either extreme or anywhere in the middle depending on how much load is applied to it. Well, that’s the EXACT same principle that controls the shift valves.



What if I told you that the rear suspension on my truck would not sag even a quarter of an inch under 2000 pounds of load, but when I added 1 more pound to it, it would fall all the way down to the bump stops. Then when I took one pound of load off the bed, it springs all the way back up to normal ride height. If I said that, most of you would laugh in my face because you know better. You’ve been around suspensions long enough to understand it simply doesn’t work that way.



When someone tells you the Chrysler trannies use snap action valves that instantly jump from one side to the other and can NEVER be partially stroked, that is EXACTLY what they are telling you. Yet, people believe it because the average person doesn’t have any experience with valvebodies and they trust without first doing their own research.



I intentionally left out the effects of the throttle valve circuit to help simplify the explanation a bit. To be technically correct, I have to mention it. The function of the throttle circuit is to make the system act as if the spring is stronger than it is. This is what allows the transmission to shift at a higher RPM as the throttle is pressed further down. But it in NO way changes how the system works or prevents slow or partial strokes.



That about covers the snap action valve theory.



Now let’s take what we’ve learned and dig a bit deeper into bindup.



Here’s a picture of a stock front servo and cap.



#ad






When the transmission shifts into 2nd gear, pressure is applied to the region with the red arrow. This pressure forces the servo to the right extending the push rod out to apply the second gear band of the transmission. That’s simple enough. When the 2-3 shift valve strokes, pressure is applied to the region with the green arrow. This same pressure is also applying the 3rd gear clutch pack at the same time. Now maybe you can begin to see the dilemma. Once again we have a battle of pressures. The apply pressure (red arrow) is still trying to push the servo to the right, while the release pressure (3rd gear pressure), is now steadily increasing until it overpowers the apply pressure and forces the servo back to the left. With equal pressure on both sides of the servo, the release pressure will win because the piston area is larger. But at the same time, since the piston surface areas are within 25% of one another, we can apply an enormous amount of pressure to the 3rd gear clutch pack before the 2nd gear band releases. Let’s put some numbers to it to make it more clear.



The surface area of the apply side of the servo is 4. 45 square inches. The surface area of the release side is 5. 87 square inches. So with a stock transmission with 60 lbs of line pressure applying the servo, it will take 45 psi of pressure on the 3rd gear clutch pack to release 2nd gear. To help out there is actually a spring in between the cap and the servo which constantly pushes the servo to the left. The reason I didn’t mention it is because it has very little affect on the pressures. Taking the spring into account, it still takes 40 psi of pressure to release 2nd gear. That’s a great deal of pressure on a slipping clutch pack waiting until the 2nd gear band releases.



This is all done using parts and valvebody schematics of the stock automatic transmission. This applies to EVERY Chrysler 47RE/RH transmission ever made. It doesn’t apply to high pressure valvebodies ONLY or modified transmissions ONLY, it applies to every single one.



To avoid premature damage, we want to get through this period of overlap as quickly as possible. Anything that causes this situation to last longer needs to be eliminated. This includes, stock front servos with no oil seal around the pushrod shaft, poorly sealing front servo sealing rings, bad lip seals in the front drum, poor sealing pump stator rings, poor quality cases, improper valvebody to case seal, etc.



All of the items listed above are common leaks in the 3rd gear feed circuit. When dealing with a partially stroked shift valve, we have a limited supply of oil feeding into the circuit because the valve is only cracked open. Any leak whatsoever will prevent our required 40 psi of pressure from building to push off the 2nd gear servo because the fluid is leaking out as fast as the shift valve is letting it in.



That is bindup from a technician’s point of view. I hope that helped some of you better understand these issues.



-Chris
 
Last edited:
Very well written, I printed it out. Good job.



I liked the part were you said 'Stroked'

But my wife refers to me now as 'snap action' LOL!!!
 
Chris



Thanks for posting your article. It is well thought out and I can see it took you some time and effort to put it all together.

I have taken the time to read it through three times over the last few days to make sure I fully understand your point of view. While contemplating you views I decided to test your theory. I decided to apply the principles used in science to prove or disprove any given hypothesis. For something to be proven scientifically true there has to be the same results from a given set of conditions and events. To put it another way there has to be the same outcome from the same circumstances. Chris as I understand it your hypothesis is that the 2-3 shift valve does not have a fast action or “snap” when it operates and that the valve gradually moves as the vehicle ground speed increases.

“Well, the exact same principles apply to shift valves. As you slowly increase the governor pressure, the shift valve SLOWLY compresses the shift spring and strokes the valve little by little until enough pressure is available to fully compress the shift spring.

If at some point during this slow stroking process, you stopped accelerating, what do you think would happen? Would the valve instantly jump to one extreme or the other because we want it to, or do you think it would stay right there in the middle?”

Just like your suspension doesn’t sit ONLY at normal ride height or all the way down on the bump stops. It will sit at either extreme or anywhere in the middle depending on how much load is applied to it. Well, that’s the EXACT same principle that controls the shift valves".

If this hypothesis is true then any one who has a 47RE or RH transmission should be able to produce a binding shift. We should be able to control the vehicle speed and hold the accelerator position (“stop accelerating”) balancing the force on both sides of the valve so the valve will stop in mid stroke. You stated that the valve movement was slow so this should be a big help in producing a binding shift condition. The question then becomes at what ground speed (governor circuit) and throttle position (RPM) is the 2-3 shift valve at its half stroke position and causing what you call a binding condition.



I have two questions written down in my truck. RPM? and MPH?. I wanted to document where the binding condition happens so I could attempt to duplicate the results. I have been trying for days now to collect the information required to establish if the hypothesis true. So far I have not been able to produce a condition where the transmission in my truck binds. I have driven the back roads to avoid traffic, stopping and starting again and have never been able to produce any binding shift condition. I have taken every effort to accelerate slowly even to the point of it being almost imperceptible and every time my truck shifts from 2nd to 3rd it shifts without hesitation or sluggishness. I have not been able to produce a binding shift. The results of my testing are that the 2-3 shift happens quickly in every scenario signifying rapid valve movement. I would say the shift is similar to turning the light switch on or off, it is in one position or the other but never in slow transition. I was a bit puzzled by this because Chris was so emphatic about how the valve works so I called three transmission shops in my area and ask to speak to the transmission rebuild technician. I told each of them I was asking about the 47RE or RH transmission, and the 2-3 shift valve in particular. My question to all three of them was when the shift valve moves from the second gear position to the third is the movement slow or fast? The answers I got back were “very quick, sudden, and it just flips to the other side”.



If others could conduct their own testing and post their results we could quickly see if this hypothesis is correct. Maybe someone could produce this binding shift event. I would be interested to know the RPM and MPH where anyone created a binding shift. I would also like to know how many times they could produce the binding condition at that same RPM and MPH. Remember for a hypothesis to be proven true the condition has to be creatable and consistently reproducible.

The following are the conclusions I came to as I gave this point of view an honest look. I am only stating what I found and my personal conclusions. I am not attempting to flame anyone. Please each of you decide for your selves.



I have read many posts on quite a few forums about this topic. It seems the only support for the (slow valve movement / binding shift) theory is coming from a minority of transmission builders with a similar company affiliation. My personal conclusion is.

An unproven theory proposed by a small school of thought is not sufficient to set a new standard for all transmission builders to follow.

Lets say I am not convinced yet.



Edward
 
Edward,

I notice my trans. hesitating as it shifts from 2nd to 3rd every morning. I drive very easy until the truck warms up and always wonder if the two three shift is ever going to happen. Once its warmed up its hammer down and no more shift hesitation. Now I always thought maybe the problem was that the trans was cold but after reading the well written post above I started thinking it was related to the bind up. Makes sense to me, either way I have no reason not to believe the above post. Are you sure you just can't feel it. The trucks do have a lot of mass.



I hope guys like strick-9 keep writing articles that those of us less knowledgeable can understand. Why would you ... ... ... never mind.
 
I'm going to guess but, I would wager that the tighter the torque converter the more you feel it. I have a DTT 91% and I can feel it, hot or cold.
 
2-3 bind up

I can consistently re-create the conditions the Chris, Edward, and tractorface describe. Under light acceleration (TV not a factor) the trans will hesitate in the 2-3 shift at ~1500 rpm and 25 mph. It's in 2nd, but doesn't want to shift into 3rd if I keep steady pedal pressure, rpm, and speed. If I press down on the accelerator pedal and "run through" 25 mph, it will shift into 3rd. Also, if I just accelerate through 25 mph the 2-3 shift occurs without incident. I usually don't have the "bind up" hesitation because I usually just accelerate through 25 mph, but I am able to reproduce the condition any time I want to.



Additionally, when slowing to ~15-20 mph for turns, the transmission stays in 3rd; it won't go back to 2nd unless I use the TV cable (push down accelerator >1/2way). Sometimes rolling to a stop light that has just turned green brings the speed down to ~10mph. The transmission will either stay in 3rd upon light acceleration or shift into 1st again if I slow to less than 10 mph.
 
Edward,



Most people that frequent the TDR remember that there is an ongoing $10,000 bet between two transmission companies as to whether 2-3 bindup is possible on the 47RH/RE transmissions.



When I first sat down to write this article, I knew that there was a lot of pride and money on the line and that there would be some retalliatory statements made. That's fine. I welcome the critics.



Edward, you asked for someone other than myself to try to simulate 2-3 bindup and the next three members that posted all said that they have felt it and can recreate it in their own trucks, even though they might not have known what it was.



One thing that's really interesting to me is that none of them (that I know of) are transmission technicians, yet they all have noticed this problem.



I'm not at all surprised that 3 transmission builders assumed the valve snaps over. I know a few people that have built trannies for years and years, yet still don't truly understand the flow dynamics that go on inside the transmission.



It doesn't take a brain surgeon to rebuild a transmission. It's just a puzzle to put back together. Unfortunately, that's about all you get from some transmission shops.



I look forward to a more technical debate in the upcoming days.



So get out your pressure gauge Edward, and let's learn some more about this transmission.



Tell me why you think the 2-3 shift valve snaps over so quickly. Is it because three parts changers told you so on the phone? Or is it because Chrysler programmed a special governor pressure curve in the PCM to avoid bind up (hint, hint). Or is it something else entirely?



No more he said, she said. Give me technical explanations and examples and above all let's keep it simple so everyone can follow along.



A description of a governor pressure test would be a great place to start.



I look forward to hearing back from either you or Clint.

-Chris
 
I have felt and can duplicate the 2-3 bind in almost every 47RE ive driven. I have noticed that the guys who baby these trucks and drive around barley touching the throttle are the ones who burn up the automatics more than the lead foot guys. This follows along exactly with what Chris is saying, slowly accelerating ,especially in the 2-3 shift point area allows the valve to hang momentarily since the vehicle is going very slowly thru that mph range. By pressing down the throttle hard your gov pressure is rising fast enough to push that valve over pretty quickly,the shift is made without fuss,and you drive right thru the bind,so to speak.
 
Well I gotta ask the stupid question here, is a hestiation between 2-3 shift necessarily the same thing as 2-3 bind up shift. IE are these exactly the same thing? Can you have bind up w/o hestitation or visa versa.



One thing that occured to me from previous threads. 2-3 bind up shift is the overlap period where second gear and third gear are engaged at the same time. If the duration was lets say 2-3 seconds, I am sure most everyone would feel that. That may even cause the tires to chirp and scare the crap out of a person not expecting it. However if the duration was . 25 seconds, would you feel that in a 7000lb vehicle moving 20-50mph. I doubt it.



I mention that partly as a comment, and partly to ask the next question. Given that companies like transgo advertise shift kits to eliminate bind up shifts, and our aftermarket trans builders take steps to reduce/eliminate bind up shifts..... ok the question... . is there an acceptable duration for bind up shifts where if the duration is short enough its acceptable. Or the other direction if 2nd gear released before 3rd gear engages and there is an "underlap" ( for lack of a better term ) is there an acceptable duration which does not cause flair and all that and is acceptable?
 
The valves in these transmissions do not pop over.



If you look at the pic's posted above. On the right side of the pic is some red dots. This is a spring. It holds the valve to the left side or the governor plug side. To cause a upshift in the trans. You need to build governor pressure. It has to be enough to overcome the spring pressure to move the valve. If you do not build enough pressure you can cause a hang or delayed shift in the trans. At this point. You are could causing the 3rd gear clutch pack to slip and the second gear band to slip. Remember at this point. One is applying the other is releasing.



To stop the problem drive threw the shift. Drive it like a Cummins not a Hugo.
 
Just for grins, lets say the 2-3 overlap is as Strick-9 describes it. Then the only fix for it would cause a 2-3 shift flare. Wouldn't a flare cause more slippage on 3rd gear engagement since the rpm's would be higher from the flare? Which would cause the most damage?
 
Devildog



Here is a heads up I think you may want to get something checked out.



Originally posted by Devildog

I'm going to guess but, I would wager that the tighter the torque converter the more you feel it. I have a *** 91% and I can feel it, hot or cold.



I edited the quote above only to remove the company name. I was reading on the web sight of the company that did your transmission. The founder stated that he has redesigned some components in the transmission he sells. He said he did this to avoid the condition you discribe. You may want to read the following link. From what I have read it appears that your transmission may not be working as he intended. I hope everything is fine, no one needs a transmission problem.



http://www.dieseltrans.com/phpBB/viewtopic.php?t=212



Edward
 
Last edited:
tractorface



I think what you describe is the nature of the beast. These transmissions are built to work properly at operating temperature. When they are cold they take longer to shift and when they shift they tend to shift harder. I notice the same thing you mentioned but with 4th gear. I live less than a mile from the interstate and on a cold day the truck takes forever to warm up. I take it easy as I get on the interstate but it seems like it takes forever for it to go into 4th gear. Once the truck is up to operating temperature everything is back to normal it shifts like a dream. At my next fluid change I am going to switch to synthetic transmission fluid. From what I have read it should help the situation. Synthetic is less viscous at low temperatures than petroleum based fluid is.

(note I edited this post changing the word more to less. As fox pointed out I goofed. )



Edward
 
Last edited:
Chris



First of all I hoped to avoid all the references to previous wagers, because those types of references tend to inflame the conversation. Secondly I regret that you feel that my post was in “retaliation”. I was simply stating the conclusions I cam to. Chris I feel I must say this because I am concerned about the way this is starting out. In your reply you made statements about the three transmission technicians I spoke with. You referred to them as “parts changers”. I doubt if you personally know them or have any knowledge of their capabilities. Because they do not agree with your view is not a justifiable reason to consider them inferior to you in their knowledge and skills. It simply means they do not agree with you. Your reference to them as “parts changers” was an underserved insult.



Chris I have a couple of questions about where you are coming from. You said there was a lot of “pride and money on the line”. Are you affiliated with a transmission shop? If yes what company’s transmission do you sell? Do you make any of your income by promoting a particular transmission company or that companies positions? I think it would be a big help for everyone reading this to know if someone stands to gain financially by supporting any point of view. Please Chris this is important.



Since I asked your affiliations I will tell you mine. I am not affiliated with any company who sells aftermarket automobile products. I am employed as a machinist in the industrial gas turbine business. I do not receive any discounts, or compensation for any opinion or position I hold. I am simply a consumer.



Chris if I accepted your theory and said you were 100% right I would not stand to loose any income and I would not have to change any business affiliation. Can you say the same thing? If you changed your position and said that a binding shift is a myth would you loose any income or have to find a new supplier? Please answer this question it matters.



Edward
 
Back
Top