Originally posted by Joe G.
I resemble that remark! I will be 65 before this week is over and ALL my moments are senior moments.
And how would you know? It's not like you can remember any of them!
(Many

's for any humor-challenged reading this. )
Chris, that was a good explanation of the 2-3 shift. Now, could you add in more of the mechanics of the shift? That is,
Starting with the trans shifting to 2nd. At what point is 2nd 'applied'? and how much more travel is there before the piston stops moving?
And when the front clutch is applied, at what point does it make contact and how much more travel is there before it stops 'applying'?
And, when the 2-3 shift occurs, isn't there always about 5 lbs. more '2nd release' pressure than '3rd apply'? (Due to that spring?) So the servo should release at the right time.
But, I'm forgetting the variously leaky mechanicals. Thus the release pressure isn't necessarily higher than the apply. Thus bind-up is more likely to occur.
Now, allow me to ease the subject to another concern. Is it possible that DC engineered a tradeoff? That they decided it was better to have some overlap wear in the trans, rather than having to build the rest of the drivetrain and frame to handle the shock of instant shifts?
Granted, armchair engineering is much like Monday morning quarterbacking. But at least in this case, understanding the big picture is as important as understanding the little ones.
Fest3er