rbattelle
TDR MEMBER
gilliland said:Just put a 6 inch tip on the stock exhaust, looks big, runs stock!
Something just doesn't seem "right" about doing this.
-Ryan
gilliland said:Just put a 6 inch tip on the stock exhaust, looks big, runs stock!
gilliland said:Just put a 6 inch tip on the stock exhaust, looks big, runs stock!
Yo Hoot said:
DHerzog said:Thanks, DLENO and everyone else... this is the best $35 I spent on my truck!!
I think, based on what I have learned here, that I'll leave my exhaust stock... I have no mods and don't want any loud noise. I will put on a big 5" stainless tip, as I think they look great!!!
If and when I opt to do any mods, I will do the exhaust at that time... . works for me... thanks again for all the great info.
FDavid said:Well i staright piped my truck (the factory 3. 5 exhaust is more than adequate, just the muffler is the big restriction) and I noticed a definite drop in power pulling from low rpms. And now finally we have the answer why
KKlepfer said:So does a fueling box that does boost fooling solve the de-fueling behavior?
TCluff Quote said:if i put 3. 5 inch ex on my truck i will gain power, probably not, it would spit the head gasket out from extremely high drive pressure.
DLeno said:yes i agree, leave it alone or add the tip for kicks. you already have 4" pipes turbo to tip anyway and I know thats good for 500 HP on a no-CAT 555 engine. So even with your CAT (which you cannot remove legally) your stock exhaust will go a long way. For your truck I wouldn't be in a hurry to do exaust. maybe just the muff.
correct; the muff is the restriction. Changing that also changes the peak HP behavor. My theory is that the stock ECM is calibrated for a certain drive pressure-to-boost pressure behavior. when you reduce exhaust restriction, slightly less drive pressure is required to acheive the same boost pressure, so the ECM backs off when it sees boost develop sooner
BTW, if you have ever seen the turbine pinwheel on this little turbocharger (see TDR issue 48) you might wonder if 3. 5" pipes aren't too big!
Correct. When you boost fool, that problem goes away. I've measured the difference in drive pressure. Ted and others have measured very small HP output differences. I think Ted was the one who originally brought this to the attention of the forum.
Head gaskets are ok with high drive pressures, which can approach the 60psi region with an exhaust brake. Its the combustion pressures they don't like, which are considerably higher than drive pressures due to the compression ratio
TCluff said:higher drive pressure=higher combustion pressure=stretched head bolts=blown head gasket![]()
rbattelle said:Why would higher drive pressure result in higher combustion pressure? That would seem to imply mean effective pressure could be increased by increasing exhaust back pressure? If that were so, output could be improved by installing a more restrictive exhaust.
Maybe I'm having trouble making the relationship you're suggesting. Once the exhaust valve opens the cylinder vents to atmosphere. High drive pressure would cause more pressure in the cylinder during the exhaust stroke, but not anywhere near as much as there would be during a combustion event.
I think I'm missing something from your equation. Can you explain further?
-Ryan
DWestfall said:So that explains my loss of power and poor MPG ever since I put 4" exhaust on. It falls flat on its face just before shifting into 2nd (defueling?), underWOT, then pulls pretty good. I may just put my old exhaust back with some sort of performance muffler. Any suggestions? My MPG's have dropped 1-3 MPG ever since. Normal driving.
TCluff said:... the higher drive pressure will stay in the combustion chamber cause it cant escape, due to back pressure , so when the valve closes, there is already some ex pressure in the combustion chamber, thus taking up valuable space that more air and fuel could be injected,
but when force fed by a turbo, it packs in tighter causing higher combustion pressures,
TCluff said:drive pressure is the exhaust pressure between the head and turbo, drive pressure is only good for one thing, and that is to drive the turbo, there is no effective way to build more power with restriction, there is no more fuel in the exhaust on an efficient engine, the higher drive pressure will stay in the combustion chamber cause it cant escape, due to back pressure, so when the valve closes, there is already some ex pressure in the combustion chamber, thus taking up valuable space that more air and fuel could be injected, but when force fed by a turbo, it packs in tighter causing higher combustion pressures, that probably hurt performance, and also drive the pyro straight up, an ideal settup would have a lower drive pressure than the boost pressure, to keep air fuel and ex flowing smoothly and to keep from superheating the combustion chamber, keeping the egt lower![]()
DLeno said:When the intake valve opens, the cylinder volume expands and the intake is force fed by the turbo as the piston decends, mixing the left over exhaust gas with incoming cool air. During this time, the large amount of cool air and the small amount of left over exhaust gasses combine and face the turbocharger. Thus, the intake air pressure at this time can not be greater than what the turbocharger can deliver.
.
DLeno said:Well, the answer to that question is not very profound because the TCluff equation contained a number of contradictions![]()