Here I am

Tooth jump = bump?

Attention: TDR Forum Junkies
To the point: Click this link and check out the Front Page News story(ies) where we are tracking the introduction of the 2025 Ram HD trucks.

Thanks, TDR Staff

Took a few unexpected pics of the daily!

TPS? Speedo gears?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Hey!

I've been reading everything I can trying to get up to speed on these 1st gens.

Quick question... to increase timing, it seems some people jump a tooth on the pump gear, some people bump timing ~1/8" by rotating the pump, and some use the M&H dynamic timing spacer... and some people do any combination of the three.

Does jumping a tooth and rotating the pump do the same thing? If so, what does 1 tooth worth of timing equal? By this I mean, does 1 tooth equal 1/8" bump of pump rotation?

Thanks, Eric
 
Yes, jumping a tooth does the same thing as rotating the pump. IIRC, 7 degrees by jumping a tooth. A lot of times whne you mod the pump, add big injectors, etc, you need to jump the tooth to get enough advance to get the injection event close. On a stock pump and all things good, you normally don't need to do that.
 
Okay, from other information I've found...

Static timing stock is 12. 5°, or about 1. 25 mm plunger lift.
Jumping one tooth gives 10° additional timing.
Bumping the pump 1/8" is approximately 3° advance.

Stock VE max dynamic timing via the KSB is 21 - 22°, or 2. 6 mm.
M&H dynamic timing spacer adds +10° dynamic timing, or 6. 4 mm at 1500 rpm pump speed, or 3000 rpm engine speed.

With reference to letters on the gear, marks set at E and O are stock. Set at C and O is one tooth advanced. To advance the timing, the gear should be bumped one tooth clockwise when facing the engine.

This sound bout right?

--Eric
 
Ok guys, still been thinking (maybe too much) :)

One reason to advance timing, is because in the OEM configuration, timing was set as a mediocre comprimise with respect to NOx and PM emissions, and was not necessarily optimized for BSFC. So, by advancing timing (some amount), the BSFC of the engine can be increased, at the expense of higher NOx.

The other reason for increasing timing, is to counter combustion phasing being pushed later and later from the addition of more fuel. Thus, the more fuel you add, the more you have to advance timing. This is seen by the guys running 400, 500, 600 hp that are jumped up to two teeth, pump to the head, KSB hotwired, etc.

So, this brings me to my question. I don't want to increase fueling a lot... just to the ~300 hp level. I also don't want to run on the ragged edge of high peak cylinder pressure and high pressure rise rate such that longevity is significantly comprimised. Just by seat of the pants guess from looking at what others have done, it seems that maybe a 6 or 7° bump in timing is what I'm after. How do I get this? Jumping a tooth gives 10° advance, which is likely too much for me (since I tow very heavy at times). Is there enough play in the pump in the opposite direction, such that I could jump a tooth and then rotate the pump away from the head by 1/8" to 3/16"? Such that I would get a 10° advance from the tooth jump and then retard 3 - 4° by rotating the pump backwards? ... thus ending up with a 6 - 7° advance over stock?

--Eric
 
Last edited:
It will somewhat depend on your injectors and pump build. If the pump is tight, using the stock roller plate, the rotor to head spec is on the low side, and the inectors are not too large, you can get away with just rotating the pump and it works well.



Certain pump and injector combinations may require advancing a tooth to tune it correctly. For the most part, if you stay with a stock specs on the pump and aim for around 300 hp you should not need to advance the gear 1 tooth.
 
Umm, if I recall correctly, there are 72 teeth on the cam... . 360/72=5* per tooth. Since the cam turns at half the speed of the crank, that makes 2. 5* per injection cycle... ... . am I correct in my thinking? That means if you move the pump 3 teeth on the cam, you advance timing 7. 5* off the crank... ... ... . If you want less, move it 2 teeth for 5*, and you can move more with the pump adjustment... ... if you have any. On most of these first gens, there are three letter indicators on the cam for pump timing, D, E, and C. I think Cummins might have known we were coming..... :D
 
I think you are way too... ..... anyway get

A nice pump built... ... I used to buy them from Peirs

Great power,not much smoke and no need

To jump teeth
 
HHhuntitall, my head's starting to hurt from the numbers. :confused: But I think 5 degrees of cam equals 10 degrees of crank like the guys are saying, since the crank spins twice as fast.
 
But I think 5 degrees of cam equals 10 degrees of crank like the guys are saying, since the crank spins twice as fast.



Thats why trying to talk degrees and pump timing is not the most exact way to do it.



Are you talking cam degrees or crank degrees? Never know for sure until it is specifically mentioned.



Plunger movement is more exact and doesn't have differnet meanings.





You are correct, cam is driven at half speed therefore 5 degrees of cam is 10 degrees of crank, expressed in degrees of crank rotation. See what I mean. :-laf
 
Thats why trying to talk degrees and pump timing is not the most exact way to do it.



Are you talking cam degrees or crank degrees? Never know for sure until it is specifically mentioned.



Plunger movement is more exact and doesn't have differnet meanings.





You are correct, cam is driven at half speed therefore 5 degrees of cam is 10 degrees of crank, expressed in degrees of crank rotation. See what I mean. :-laf



Yep..... why I never should have said a word!:-laf
 
Well, I guess I'm talking crank angle degrees. That's what timing is referenced as, correct?

I'm trying to reconcile practical and technical information. In the gasser world, timing is in crank angle (CA) degrees BTDC, with respect to spark timing. In the diesel world, timing is still crank-angle degrees BTDC, but with respect to SOI (start of injection). Correct?

I understand that plunger movement is more exact (for this application, and if you have the tools, dial indicator, etc) for repeatability. However, I have no knowledge base on what reference plunger depth has to heat release, timing, pressure rise, etc.

When I say (I think this right) that jumping a tooth yields 10° advance, it means that jumping one tooth on the VE pump gear will have the effect of advancing the start of injection by 10° of crank rotation, as commonly stated. Likewise, pushing the pump to the head will allow fuel to be injected ~ 3° earlier in the cycle.

To compare combustion across different series Cummins engines, it makes more sense to reference °CA SOI BTDC... since not all Cummins had a plunger-type injection system, but all Cummins have top dead center piston location that can be used as a reference for fuel injection.

Does this sound right? :/

At any rate, I'm just trying to get a feel for how to advance the timing... and how much the different methods change timing.

--Eric
 
To compare combustion across different series Cummins engines, it makes more sense to reference °CA SOI BTDC...



It is tough to compare across different Cummins engines because of how they function though, even in just the B series the timing is different based on the CPL.



The stock setting is listed as 8-12 degrees of crank degrees at the suggested factory pump piston travel. Its not exact because there is no way to exactly measure SOI. There are too many dynamic variables coming into play to say at 1. 2 mm of piston travel SOI will be 10 degrees of crank timing.



You say 10 degrees I say closer to 7 on a tooth bump because of the lag. Change the internal head to rotor . 5 mm and the SOI is liable to change 5 degrees. The build specs give a full millimeter of range setting but take my word for it, 1/2 millimeter difference will change your SOI.



Add larger injectors and you can get 3-5 degrees of advance SOI.



Change the internasl plate in the VE that controls how fast pressure ramps and you have completely changed the timing event in respect to SOI and crank degrees, not to mention the duration of the event.



On the CR engines, and even the VP's, it simpossible to talk SOI in terms of crank timing because it is so dynamic and variable. The impact of timing on temps also has to consider the length of the event and the amount of fuel injected. Trying take one aspect and definitely state THIS will happen is what is called a SWAG. :-laf
 
You say 10 degrees I say closer to 7 on a tooth bump because of the lag.

Do you mean the physical hydraulic delay in causing the injector to pop-off?

I know that SOI isn't the "tell all", but it is a (somewhat) useful thing for me to roll around in my head and reference. I see you have a 3rd gen like myself, and are aware that rail pressure, injector size, etc, etc all have an effect on what the "timing" actually is.

I guess my confusion, is trying to reconcile what I do at work, with what I do at play. At work, our engines are highly instrumented, with in-cylinder pressure transducers, high speed data acquisition (one fifth of a degree CA resolution), with complicated and very expensive real-time combustion feedback (heat release plots, pressure traces, 10% mass fraction burned, 50% MFB, 90% MFB, IMEP, BMEP, NMEP, peak pressure, pressure rise rates, etc). The data is at such high resolution and transfer rate, that even with a large buffer, it is nearly impossible to save the data to the outer portion of the hardrive's circumference, as the data can't be written that fast. And then, I jump in my truck to head home, and pick 0, 1, 2, or 3 for timing on Smarty, and have no idea what any of them do, how aggressive Marco went on his "advanced" timing settings, etc, etc. Or I jump in the '91. 5, and wonder how much bsfc improvement I could get by advancing timing, but struggle with the apprehension of sacrificing longevity due to raising peak cylinder pressure too high.

This is probably not productive to talk about such things, but I've been somewhat soft and wordy and rambling today for some reason. Which brings me to say, I think I'm going to sell my Smarty, TST, and TS MP-8 and get EFI Live for the '06. I still won't have a clue what is going on in the cylinder, but at least timing will be what I tell it to be... or something like that :)

--Eric
 
Last edited:
Do you mean the physical hydraulic delay in causing the injector to pop-off?



Yes. Since we don't have a constant rail pressure on a VE it really makes it harder to judge SOI because fo the variables. Truthfully a CR is easier because you have a relatively constant pressure where a jerk pump is relying on a pressure wave generated in the pump to pop the injectors.





At work, our engines are highly instrumented, with in-cylinder pressure transducers, high speed data acquisition (one fifth of a degree CA resolution), with complicated and very expensive real-time combustion feedback



I am positive Cummins did all this when they engineered the engine. Good luck trying to find anything like that. Its proprietary.



In fact, just ry to get cam profiles from Cummins and see which rat hole you end up in. :rolleyes: In comparison to gasser engines where just about every nuance is understood and published, these diesels are almost a black box with respect to the pertinent info like we are kicking around here.



BTW, where do you work with all that instrumentations? NASA? A nuclear power plant? :)
 
Yes. Since we don't have a constant rail pressure on a VE it really makes it harder to judge SOI because fo the variables. Truthfully a CR is easier because you have a relatively constant pressure where a jerk pump is relying on a pressure wave generated in the pump to pop the injectors.

Hmm, ok, understand.

BTW, where do you work with all that instrumentations? NASA? A nuclear power plant? :)

I work at NTRC, the National Transportation Research Center. National Transportation Research Center - NTRC

In particular, the Fuels, Engines, and Emissions Research Center within NTRC. Welcome - Fuels, Engines, and Emissions Research Center - FEERC

If you're ever in the Knoxville area, give me a couple day notice and I'll give you a tour if you're interested.

--Eric
 
Last edited by a moderator:
You seem to be pretty handy witha wrench, rotate the pump and watch the gauges. If that doesn't do it for the asometer jump a tooth and retard the pump. What's the worst that could happen????? ;)
 
You seem to be pretty handy witha wrench, rotate the pump and watch the gauges. If that doesn't do it for the asometer jump a tooth and retard the pump. What's the worst that could happen????? ;)



Knock, knock, knock, knock, knock, knock... ... ... :D



I had the timing way too far on my '97 at one point. Sounded like a Caterpillar ever time I got on the throttle. Counter-productive, and really annoying behind the steering wheel. :-laf



I've found a good camshaft has a lot to do with fuel economy, too; I'd say almost as much as a good pump with good injectors. My '93 has been getting around 15-16 with a medium sized trailer, pulling another truck or pallets of wire and t-posts. It used to do around 11-12, and I've yet to run a full tank out of it without pulling a trailer at least 100mi or so... ... But now your chasing shadows with a spotlight if you want to start measuring every cylinder pressure sequence, chasing individual injector pop-off pressures to maximize injection effeciency... . not that you don't need a hobby, and I wouldn't find it interesting to listen to or read... ... . I figured it at one time, upgrading camshaft, that is, and it would payback itself, not counting labor, in less than 10k miles, if fuel mileage went from 17-18 to 22-23 like it has on my '03. But then we get into valve timing and cylinder head flow, compression ratios, injector nozzle angles, fuel plumes... ... . enough to exponentially complicate the process... ... :eek:uch:



Ok, now I'm getting "The Twitch"... ... . that's usually followed by a mad rush out the door, a loud noise, and a huge cloud of smoke... ... . oh, and a blaring Motorola TRS signal stack for Denton County..... :eek:
 
ok im putting my thoughts in to this mostly cause i think it will help me learn something. my experience with the ve pump is limited. i have a back ground in diesel technology and spent a lot of hours both professionaly and as a hobby studying mechanical fuel sytems. im probably only going to muddy the waters but maybe my input will help (i doubt it)



Yes. Since we don't have a constant rail pressure on a VE it really makes it harder to judge SOI because fo the variables. Truthfully a CR is easier because you have a relatively constant pressure where a jerk pump is relying on a pressure wave generated in the pump to pop the injectors.









I am positive Cummins did all this when they engineered the engine. Good luck trying to find anything like that. Its proprietary.



In fact, just ry to get cam profiles from Cummins and see which rat hole you end up in. :rolleyes: In comparison to gasser engines where just about every nuance is understood and published, these diesels are almost a black box with respect to the pertinent info like we are kicking around here.



BTW, where do you work with all that instrumentations? NASA? A nuclear power plant? :)



ok all things being equal, i. e. fuel temp, lp pressure, and injector pop pressure. soi should be acurate, timing off the crank should be suffiecent too. now 36 teeth on the cam is 10* per tooth, the cam acts like an idler and since we are talking fuel and not air its timing is irrelivent. timing is measured in degrees of crank angle just like a gasser. optimum soi would be x* btdc calced for burn time of fuel, causing cylinder pressure to peak just after tdc, maximizing downforce on piston.



variables can be somewhat measured and calculated. a thick walled injector line and lots of the little rubber isolators to keep spikes to a minimum, fuel temp would probably not affect timing only power, lp pressure would need to be held constant with a good overflow valve. injector pop pressure can be mostly eliminated if taken to a shop and very carefully set.



once thats all done and all high pressure parts are in good condition. find the volume of the fuel line from injection pump at bdc all the way to the nozzle of the injector, you could find how much lift will have to be generated to reach the injector pop pressure. this would be the lift of the pump cummins measures for soi. set that lift at optimum timing stated above. you would have most of the variable eliminated or at least controled. it would not be perfect but i would bet that any variance would not noticeable and probably just barely measurable. to verify your calculations you could you a line transducer to determine actual soi. again not perfect but probably very close.



Ok guys, still been thinking (maybe too much) :)



One reason to advance timing, is because in the OEM configuration, timing was set as a mediocre comprimise with respect to NOx and PM emissions, and was not necessarily optimized for BSFC. So, by advancing timing (some amount), the BSFC of the engine can be increased, at the expense of higher NOx.



The other reason for increasing timing, is to counter combustion phasing being pushed later and later from the addition of more fuel. Thus, the more fuel you add, the more you have to advance timing. This is seen by the guys running 400, 500, 600 hp that are jumped up to two teeth, pump to the head, KSB hotwired, etc.



So, this brings me to my question. I don't want to increase fueling a lot... just to the ~300 hp level. I also don't want to run on the ragged edge of high peak cylinder pressure and high pressure rise rate such that longevity is significantly comprimised. Just by seat of the pants guess from looking at what others have done, it seems that maybe a 6 or 7° bump in timing is what I'm after. How do I get this? Jumping a tooth gives 10° advance, which is likely too much for me (since I tow very heavy at times). Is there enough play in the pump in the opposite direction, such that I could jump a tooth and then rotate the pump away from the head by 1/8" to 3/16"? Such that I would get a 10° advance from the tooth jump and then retard 3 - 4° by rotating the pump backwards? ... thus ending up with a 6 - 7° advance over stock?



--Eric



Eric i dont think timing would affect bsfc directly. there is no doubt in my mind that with the work you are doing and the equipment you use you know better than i, however with a pump, hard line, nozzle set up in order for the engine to run there is a minimum amount of fuel needed, that volume is what builds the pressure and pops the injector at the right time, this in turn makes the engine operate correctly, if fuel pressure is low or volume is low then the timing retards and poor performance arises. what a timing advance would do is put fuel into the cylinder sooner allowing a longer burn time, which equals more complete burn, more power out of the same volume of fuel, which means less throttle for a given rpm, this backs off the fuel, and the engine uses less, increasing mileage and bsfc.



as to your second part in the p pumps the static timing is between 12. 5 and 14 depending on make and model, rule of thumb is advance to between 15 and 18, depending on normal cruise rpm, mods, and power goals. with the dynamic timing of the ve you have a real advantage take the static timing and advance it for peak cylinder pressure at idle or 1000 rpm. the dynamic timing will take over from there and keep it at peak through a longer rpm range, from reading the posts in the thread it looks like a kit can be had that increases dynamic range, that would be a good thing.



if you really want to get into it, determine your cruise rpm where you spend most of your time, see what timing is at, at that rpm(static + dynamic) then take your dynamic timing add it to any new static timing you set to bring optimum timing at that rpm. this will net you the best bsfc and mpg.



Umm, if I recall correctly, there are 72 teeth on the cam... . 360/72=5* per tooth. Since the cam turns at half the speed of the crank, that makes 2. 5* per injection cycle... ... . am I correct in my thinking? That means if you move the pump 3 teeth on the cam, you advance timing 7. 5* off the crank... ... ... . If you want less, move it 2 teeth for 5*, and you can move more with the pump adjustment... ... if you have any. On most of these first gens, there are three letter indicators on the cam for pump timing, D, E, and C. I think Cummins might have known we were coming..... :D



HHuntitall your right on those numbers, using the cam gear to pump relation would time your injectors to the valve train, not the piston. the cam and pump both turn at the same speed 1/2 engine rpm. when timing the pump the cam gear is just an idler and does not affect the pump timing, to use the timing marks on the cam, the engine and cam must be timed correctly and the engine at tdc 1. so every tooth jumped is 10* jumping a tooth and rotating the pump back (if possible) would be 10*-x*= static timing adv. then static adv. + dynamic adv. @ x rpm= total adv. @ x rpm.



on that pic does it give any indication as to what each letter means in realation to timing? they dont highlight those letters for nothing.



i hope this helps. im not trying to stir the waters up, these are just the things i ponder in my free time and love the oportunity to get a different view on what ive come up with. i do not take offense to being told im wrong, though i will try and argue it, to see if it will hold up. i also hope that nobody takes ofense to what ive said im not trying to say anyone is wrong, this is just my theory.



also Eric what kinda of degree do you hold to get a job like that. it sounds like something of a dream job to me, im working on a mechanical engineering degree with the hope of getting into something like what your doing. how do you get a job like that? what does it take?



My head hurts. ;)



my head hurts now too.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top