Ok turbo gurus, I have been thinking again and my brain hurts. Here’s the question (with a few qualifications up front):
• All of the B1 turbos have the same compressor and housing,
• All of the B1 turbos are optimum at 46-48# boost with near 1:1 PR,
• I am externally waste gated (soon, and may go twins later) and it would be nice to change as few parts as possible!
• A kwik-spool exhaust housing will get to 46# boost sooner that a full B1 exhaust housing,
Now the question: Why would anyone use an exhaust housing larger than the KS housing when you can spool quicker to 46#, bypass any additional exhaust with the waste gate, and have less rotating mass because of the smaller turbine wheel? What is the downside to this equation?
I always read that the larger turbo exhaust housings have better top end versus the smaller housing’s spool-up, but if both turbos are most efficient at the same boost then top end should be the same **IF** they are wastegated to the same max boost.
OK, LET ME HAVE IT!!!
• All of the B1 turbos have the same compressor and housing,
• All of the B1 turbos are optimum at 46-48# boost with near 1:1 PR,
• I am externally waste gated (soon, and may go twins later) and it would be nice to change as few parts as possible!
• A kwik-spool exhaust housing will get to 46# boost sooner that a full B1 exhaust housing,
Now the question: Why would anyone use an exhaust housing larger than the KS housing when you can spool quicker to 46#, bypass any additional exhaust with the waste gate, and have less rotating mass because of the smaller turbine wheel? What is the downside to this equation?
I always read that the larger turbo exhaust housings have better top end versus the smaller housing’s spool-up, but if both turbos are most efficient at the same boost then top end should be the same **IF** they are wastegated to the same max boost.
OK, LET ME HAVE IT!!!
