A Pristine Pestilence

Attention: TDR Forum Junkies
To the point: Click this link and check out the Front Page News story(ies) where we are tracking the introduction of the 2025 Ram HD trucks.

Thanks, TDR Staff

Northwest Bombers

Stupid Car Luck

In my Walter Mitty-ish daydreams I sometimes imagine myself a wordsmith - that being, one who can so skillfully use words that there is noone who can mistake either the meaning, or even argue the meaning of of one's carefully constructed prose.



That being so, I despair greatly of our nation ever regaining our language. Words have definite and discoverable meanings... and even more importantly, reality EXISTS... Not that reality is whatever you say it is, but that it exists, immutably refuting all who defy it in such a way that their words congeal about them and they find themselves alone in thier delusions.



These two simple, and absolutely correct facts have almost been forgotten. The words of many now reflect the fact that they assume that reality is merely what one can convince MOST of those who cannot directly see, and many of those who can, that what exists, does not, and what does not exist, does.



<B>Pestilence</B>

Pronunciation: 'pes-t&-l&n(t)s

Function: noun

Date: 14th century

1 : a contagious or infectious epidemic disease that is virulent and devastating; especially : BUBONIC PLAGUE

2 : something that is destructive or pernicious <I'll pour this pestilence into his ear -- Shakespeare>

(This is a quote from Merriam Webster's online dictionary)



<B>Pristine</B>

Pronunciation: 'pris-"tEn, pri-'stEn, esp British 'pris-"tIn

Function: adjective

Etymology: L pristinus; akin to Latin prior

Date: 1534

1 : belonging to the earliest period or state : ORIGINAL <the hypothetical pristine lunar atmosphere>

2 a : not spoiled, corrupted, or polluted (as by civilization) : PURE <a pristine forest> b : fresh and clean as or as if new <pristine hard-backs in uniform editions to fill our built-in bookcases -- Michiko Kakutani>



In the debate over whether to drill for oil within the ANWR, the sad fact is, that reality is entirely lost upon the "anti-oil" crowd. Thier arguments are in effect, an arrogant and totally dishonest attempt to make you think contrary to reality. Anti drilling zealots show pictures of snow capped mountains, mammalian wildlife in abundance, an unusual and delicately balanced zone of life and beauty in one of the most remote and untouched by man areas of the globe.



But it's a lie.



The area that the oil is in is NOT that at all. It is a arctic ocean coastal plain. There are no trees, no moose. Hardly any animals at all. Most animal life can't survive in this horrible place. In the harshest environment this nation has, there is only one kind of life... predatory. For a few short weeks, the area thaws on the surface, water pools on the flat tundra, and insect life, fed by endless sun and the blood of the few mammals who do manage to endure thier onslaught create the definition of pestilence.



But you say, it is pristine. Oh, and that is a virtue? Krakatoa, shortly after it's explosive birth was "pristine" as well. A steaming, smoking, belching cauldron of poison, heat, smoke, and pollution, who's birth caused death.



But it's not quite "pristine" anyway. The natives have been hunting and killing the caribou and other mammals who do manage to endure the pestilence in the area for some time now. Man's presence has been there for quite some time. We don't even forbid them from hunting there anyway... We're only interested in modifying the behavior of "regular" Americans (and others) who don't fit within a certain genetic family history. (what's this again about "all men being created equal"???)



In an area who's land mass exceeds that of a good lot of our states, we're discussing the reclassification of an area the size of a really big airport. There aren't any roads there. There won't be many roads there. There won't be anyone else there, other than the unlucky and probably victimized souls who, by the luck of the draw, end up having to go there and endure this "pristine pestilence".



So I ask you now... What if, when the map for ANWR was drawn, this particular corner edge hadn't been included? Would ANWR have been horribly and utterly misbegotten? Would it have been the equivalent of the stillborn child who died because he had no working lungs, if this little corner had not been included? No, ANWR would be precisely as it is now. Nothing owuld have been missed, nothing would have been ruined, and nobody on earth would have EVER "discovered" that an infinitely important and utterly irreplaceable part had been left out.



So drill for the oil. Put in roads. Put in pipelines. Put in people. Put in machines. Why? So that the curious, the explorers, the fanatics, the fans, the honest, and perhaps even a few of the dishonest will actually have the chance to SEE why it was that Adam and Eve were punished when they were banned from thier garden home - that they then had to endure the "pristine pestilence" of the world outside thier control.



Maybe, just maybe, if it happens, if some yet unknown soul decides to verify the destruction of the "pristine" area by our greed and thirst for oil, that he will discover and publish the reality of there being a pristine paradise - the one we've been shown, and a pristine pestilence - the on we're not being shown, and that we, as humans, CAN make a judgement about what is paradise, what is not, and maybe, just maybe, restore a little integrity back to our language, our nation, our national discourse... Maybe. I'm not holding my breath... But I think it's worth a try.
 
Originally posted by Power Wagon

one who can so skillfully use words that there is noone who can mistake either the meaning, or even argue the meaning of of one's carefully constructed prose.



That being so, I despair greatly of our nation ever regaining our language. Words have definite and discoverable meanings... and even more importantly, reality EXISTS... Not that reality is whatever you say it is, but that it exists, immutably refuting all who defy it in such a way that their words congeal about them and they find themselves alone in thier delusions.



Mark, your observation of the ANWAR situation is dead on. Although I have not studied it to any extent, I will still agree with you.



I would like to address one of the other points of your post quoted above. I too, seek understanding in communication whether written or spoken. I have found it to be possibly an unattainable goal to think that someday, we will all understand each other perfectly. While certain words, or types of words, may hold the same meaning for all, most words (especially those of a descriptive nature) are highly subjective and colored by the individual experience of the listener. Therefore, when I say "blue" you may think of the color Patriot Blue. Or, when I say "pain" you may think of hitting your thumb with a hammer. All the while what I meant by "blue" was pale blue, and the pain was that of paying your bills and having no money left! These are very simplified illustrations of my point. As an experience or situation becomes more complicated OR further from the listeners own experience, the likelihood of true understanding diminishes exponentially.



I know this has nothing to do with ANWAR, Diesels, or trucks but I was inspired by your writing.



Cheers, Tim
 
Drill

Lets go ahead and open up Yellowstone to drilling too. Hell,it only a old volcanic area with a bunch of picinic basket stealin bears!After that we can start on the White house steps,just a bunch of windbags and oil company people there!If we run out there we can drill in our backyards... ... :eek: :mad:
 
This IS what I'm talking about. We don't discuss reality, instead, it's an emotional rant that simply fails to address, in any relevant way, the reality of what the issue is.



The fact is: There is no reason NOT to drill where they want to. There is nothing pristine or pure or lovely or beautiful that would be destroyed, nothing at all.



The only reason to NOT drill that anyone has come up with... is that it's within the borders of a politically designated reserve. But for the total ignorance of those who drew the borders, this little bit of space would never have been included, and in fact, a relatively large part of it would never have, since it simply DOES NOT accomplish the desired result.



Nobody, including me, is suggesting we harm the purpose of ANWR. Drilling for oil in the fields next to Prudhoe Bay in no way impacts the purpose or the validity of the rest of the it.



I asked the question, one you did not answer: What if this segment had never been included... . would ANWR have been worthless? No. It would have been precisely what it is now, and what it will be even if we use a little corner of it for needed oil exploration.
 
Drill

My backyard is open for drilling anytime, so long as I get a 5% ride. Lemme see, even a lower producing well of 50-100 bbls/day would allow me to retire almost immediately. A higher producing well of 1000-3000 bbls/day and I'd be a millionaire a couple of times over in 2-3 years. Then I could afford to build a fake building around the pumpjack so it would not be noticable.



Besides my wolf pack would most likely react the same way they did when I installed a bug Zapper in the kennel. They would crowd around, sit on their haunches and stare into the light as the bugs were electrocuted. I figure the ka-chunk, ka-chunk, ka-chunk every few seconds coupled with the round and round motion of the counterweights on the jack would keep them entertained for quite awhile. ;)
 
Way out?

You can use all the three sylable words you want. it is not going to change the FACT:There is no real proof of oil reserves in ANWR!Fact:This is just another way for the oil companys to further there profits!Fact:The present people in charge have a energy policy designed to line there own pockets!Fact:If they find oil there where next?I am not being irational,just looking down the line. Whether or not this land is habitat for mosquitos or humans is NOT the question. It has been set aside for wildlife,NOT human habitat!How selfish we have become,when we as humans think we own this earth!We are just residents.



In the near future we will have to make the decision to dump our oil burning ways. We have enjoyed it,but time marches on and we had better think about the world we are leaving our grandchildren! :rolleyes: If we keep drilling,Where are we going to retire to?
 
Fact:The present people in charge have a energy policy designed to line there own pockets!



Spoken like a true liberal. Champ. Flt. , if I felt as strongly about this as you appear to, I would be driving a solar-powered electric vehicle. "I" would be doing my part to reduce dependence on OPEC instead of just bad-mouthing the present administration.
 
PW, well put.



CF, I'll ask another question, but it does not replace Mark's.



Nature has always been able to rebalance itself. With due caution and good management, can man and nature co-exist? Or should we simply allow mankind, and progress in particular, to regress to the rate found in the 1700's?



I'd say that more factual research than the knee jerking reactionary response that most nay sayers come up with needs to be done.



Am I wrong?



Is Mark off the mark? (ouch)
 
CF's retirement.

"If we keep drilling,Where are we going to retire to?"



CF, if you promise to spend your retirement in ANWR's coastal plain, I will personally lobby Congress to prohibit drilling there!!:D :D :D



Oh, and by the way, if there is no oil in ANWR, how will the big, bad oil companies profit by drilling there? Sometimes, your logic escapes me. :rolleyes:
 
Last edited:
Its all about profit.

Folks first I would like to respond by saying this (so called)energy policy is all about profit. Where do you all think GWs from?And who do you think paid his way?If you believe otherwise you must be blind. His policy has several major tax cuts for the oil companys in it(some of them a good thing). Its just the same with the Demorats,they have there very questionable people paying the way also.



Second if we drill in one small area and find a little oil,don't you think this will open up drilling in other areas?Many other areas. And its not knee jerk when I say maybe your backyard next... Profits come from the tax write off,if they don't find oil. Win win for the oil companys... .



And third even if we open up drilling in ANWR it is only a short term fix(very short). Yes,I love my old oil burners,however I hold my driving to a minimum and practice conservation and have for many years.



This is not an disscusion on whether ANWR is potential habitat for myself or others. It is where do we stop making feeble excuses for our selfish ways?Man,I have loved burning rubber down the highway in my hot rods,but things change. We can change with it or die like the dinosaur... ... ... :(I see it as an exciting time,if we use as much time thinking about how we can get more power out of our rigs,and focus on alternative energy sources,you could all be millionares.



Go back to the days of 1700s,come on ,now that some REAL knee jerk reaction there... Nature does have a way of replenishing herself. However it takes a whole lot longer than it does to tear it up. And to move into a wildlife reserve(even if it is just a mosquito nest)just so we can save . 10 a gallon is just selfish. What a spoiled bunch we are.



:( :( :(
 
Re: Way out?

Originally posted by Champane Flight

You can use all the three sylable words you want. it is not going to change the FACT:There is no real proof of oil reserves in ANWR!Fact:This is just another way for the oil companys to further there profits!Fact:The present people in charge have a energy policy designed to line there own pockets!Fact:If they find oil there where next?I am not being irational,just looking down the line. Whether or not this land is habitat for mosquitos or humans is NOT the question. It has been set aside for wildlife,NOT human habitat!How selfish we have become,when we as humans think we own this earth!We are just residents.



In the near future we will have to make the decision to dump our oil burning ways. We have enjoyed it,but time marches on and we had better think about the world we are leaving our grandchildren! :rolleyes: If we keep drilling,Where are we going to retire to?





No real proof of oil reserves. Actually, there is no real proof of any oil reserve anywhere in the world that hasn't been drilled.



Considering the INCREDIBLE expense of operating at/near prudhoe bay, yes, it would have to be profitable to afford to drill there. Also, considering that fact yet again, there has to be a really GOOD chance of striking considerable oil, or else they would not even bother to try.



This is another way for oil companies to further thier profits. Dang... You are so incredibly insightful. BTW, I hope so. I hope they all make a profit and a good one at that. I wish profitability on every company, for that matter. Profits are what create jobs, create economic opportunity, fund research and development, pays the taxes that pay for lots of things we (stupidly) have government do for us. Face it, PROFITS ARE GOOD. Thank you for making my point for me. I guess you are well rounded enough to list even the good points of drilling up there.



If they find oil there where will they go from there?

Where ever there's oil, i'm sure. Which is a good thing. Oil, like gold, silver, molybdenum, copper, iron, water, quartz, and a large number of other things you need that are pretty much essential to life as we know it, are found in all sorts of places and we generally have to go there to get them. Just as we have and still are learning how to farm and not ruin our land, we can drill for oil, mine our gold, and so on, without destroying our land. Just having some two bit governmnet employee draw lines on a map does not make a spot sacred. We can just as well un-draw it and re-draw it where it serves the purpose for which it is intended AND allows us to do what we need to do, as well.



It was set aside for wildlife... What a crock. It was a political act, and it can be undone politically. It is not sacred, and the act - so far as it concerns the area with potential oil - serves NO USEFUL PURPOSE.
 
Power Wagon,



Well said... ..... and incredibly narrow minded. You characterization that the area serves no useful purpose other than for oil development is absolutely true for you. Unfortunately the world does not revolve around you and your personal interests. Ditto!!!

;)
 
I'm with Lhotka and Champ. You know that we must be getting real close to the end of the petro era when we need to drill in a polar region that has been set aside as a preserve. I feel drilling in the ANWR is a stupid last gap attempt to line the oil companies pockets. What will it give us, a couple more months of oil? As I've said before, save what oil is left for making Vaseline, there will always be someone tiring to give it to you from behind.
 
I for one, don't really give a red rat's butt if an oil company makes a profit. And boy do they make a profit. What's lost in the emotional side of this issue is that we are not self-reliant when it comes to energy. So instead of drilling within our own shores, we rely upon the political stability of the most volatile region in the world: The Middle East. Men, oil is the lifeblood of our society, without it we are nothing more than a 3rd world nation. If you don't believe me, just do a bit of research into the products you utilize in your normal daily life. A large percentage comes directly or indirectly from the oil pulled out of the earth by oil companies. I for one have never understood why people get so uptight because somebody else is making more money than they are. Concentrate on the life you have and make it better. I know of what I speak of here from personal experience. At the end of the day, the only thing you really have to hold on to is the fact that you gave that day your best. Ultimately, you will succeed. To what extent is the only obstacle that lies in your path.



Quoted from illflem:



What will it give us, a couple more months of oil? As I've said before, save what oil is left for making Vaseline, there will always be someone tiring to give it to you from behind.



Could that be called the Pucker Factor Quotient :D :eek: :p
 
Last edited:
Re: Its all about profit.

Originally posted by Champane Flight



... Profits come from the tax write off,if they don't find oil. Win win for the oil companys... .



:( :( :(



CF, you and Kramer both know as much about tax write offs. At least he admitted it -- "No, I don't know what it is, but the Post Office does and they are the ones writing it off!"



Even if the oil companies could deduct the entire cost from their taxes (which they can't) they still don't make a profit from a dry well.
 
Back
Top