excellent. you know, what would be interesting is to see how much of a difference you actually feel. From my experimentation, I find that the EZ probably fuels up to its maximum at the lower boost pressures anyway (I measured 26,500 psi rail pressure at 25 lbs boost). So the question becomes "do you actually make any more power or lower EGTs any with the elbow?" the data I have suggests that the benefit is either marginal or zero.
At 25 lbs boost pressure (stock wastegate) I find close to 400 degrees temperature differential pre versus post. At 27 lbs boost (acheived with a predator stage 3) the differential temperature was 500 degrees during acceleration. To me, this clearly illustrates the air flow choke point of the charger. Normally, the charger runs well under 300 degrees differential temperature.
Ordinarily, higher boost pressures would correspond to lower EGTs, since more air is moving through the engine at the same fueling level. However, beyond the mid to upper 20s, I believe the the HY-9 is outside of its efficiency map and is essentially pumping out hot air. Ergo, little or no real gain. It was designed for quick spoolup at lower boost pressures to meet federal emissions requriements. That means at high boost pressures, the poor compressor spins faster than it was designed to, putting the bearings and shafts at risk.
Now, those are the conclusions I come to based on the experimentation I have done. I haven't put an EZ on the dyno yet to measure with and without the elbow, and I haven't looked at the turbo's efficiency map (they are not published). So I'm reaching conclusions that are valid in my opinion, just not proven with statistical rigor.
so getting back to your truck. I would really appreciate your comments on whether or not you feel a difference in your truck's power without the boost level. Theory says you will see little to no difference (for example, you might feel the same power but EGTs might be slightly higher), but I'd like a reality check.