JoshPeters said:
I like the Bentz approach... and I fully repsect the Comp/Sheids approach. Build it till it breaks or break it, then build it till you can't break it.
Josh
I totally agree with the double trick, wazoo lookin, latest in the magazine, chromed, polished, carbon fiber, titanium, Un-obtanium, high dollar, super light weight, aftermarket part approach if you have the money, but, with my operating budget, I use the B. E. N. T. Z. approach:
"B" = Broken, bruised, blued and bent parts, reused. Core piles are my friend.
"E" = Economy at all costs, beg, borrow, and almost steal, but be honest.
"N" = Never buy new. Used parts have "experience".
"T" = Twist it till it hurts, bends or breaks, and then re-engineer it again.
"Z" = Zero cost parts with some polishing, or simple modifications sure seem to work much better than the trick of the week part that you have to re drill, resurface, or re-engineer to get it to work, anyway.
I can think of a lot of parts in our car that people point out and ask why we still run this or that? Simple. They have not broken yet.
I agree with Comp on the weight issue, and am already working on a lighter short block, and getting rid of some of the ballast on the car. Nothing radical, just helium filled tires, titanium key fob, plastic rod bolts, and buffing half of the paint off. I figure 3 pounds ought to be good for . 001 seconds better ET...