A direct quote: "Therefore, NHTSA wishes to, as rapidly as possible, determine why the real world performance for existing, production ABS is not producing the anticipated effectiveness that has been suggested under test track conditions. "
Stand by for a long post...
Some of you have ABS systems that are performing as envisioned, and I'm sure its a great thing. I agree there are legal issues involved with attempting to solve braking performance problems at the end-user level with "unauthorized" modifications. But this issue goes deep - just like the first-generation air bags that "saved" some people, while killing others. Not all ABS systems, and not every unit of "generally" good systems, is performing the way it should. And when DC can't fix your brakes, the customer is going to have to make a difficult decision - try to fix it, or just give up and sell the vehicle? The first choice is "probably" illegal, the second choice is almost certainly unethical, so what should a person do? Like I said, no easy answers.
I'm not blowing smoke when I say some ABS units or systems aren't working right. From the
NHTSA web page, you'll find the full text of the article quoted here:
A number of statistical analyses of accident databases have been performed during the last three years. These analyses suggest that the introduction of ABS does not seem to have reduced the number of automobile accidents where they were expected to be effective. Kahane stated that involvements in multi-vehicle crashes on wet roads were significantly reduced by 24 percent, and nonfatal crashes by 14 percent (with ABS). However, these reductions were offset by a statistically significant increase in the frequency of single-vehicle, run-off-road crashes (rollovers or impacts with fixed objects), as compared to cars without ABS. Fatal run-off-road crashes were up by 28 percent and nonfatal crashes by 19 percent. It is unknown to what extent, if any, this increase is due to ABS or other causes. It is also unknown to what extent, if any, this increase is due to drivers incorrect usage of ABS or incorrect responses by drivers to their ABS.
In comparison, some benefits were observed for light vehicles other than automobiles (pickup trucks, sport utility vehicles, and vans), equipped with two-wheel ABS instead of the four-wheel ABS used on most automobiles. Two-wheel ABS has been effective in reducing the risk of nonfatal run-off-road crashes for almost every type of light truck. Nonfatal rollovers were reduced by 30 to 40 percent. Side impacts with fixed objects were reduced by 15 to 30 percent. Frontal impacts with fixed objects were reduced by 5 to 20 percent.
In general, ABS appears to be a very promising safety device when evaluated on a test track. Under many pavement conditions, ABS allows the driver to stop a vehicle more rapidly while maintaining steering control, even during extreme panic braking. Therefore, NHTSA wishes to, as rapidly as possible, determine why the real world performance for existing, production ABS is not producing the anticipated effectiveness that has been suggested under test track conditions.