Here I am

Dont park here

Attention: TDR Forum Junkies
To the point: Click this link and check out the Front Page News story(ies) where we are tracking the introduction of the 2025 Ram HD trucks.

Thanks, TDR Staff

buying a boost gauge, 0-30 or 0-60?

Thermocupler Install

Status
Not open for further replies.
KOKOMO, Ind. -- A DaimlerChrysler worker who defied a new policy by parking his GMC pickup truck in a spot reserved for Chrysler-only products will not have to pay for his vehicle being towed from the lot.

SURVEY

Do you agree with Chrysler's policy that will force non-Chrysler owners to walk farther to work?

Yes

No



Results | Disclaimer





The owner of the towing company said he would not charge Indiana Transmission Plant worker Donald Campbell because he does not agree with the policy.



Campbell, 37, said he owns two Chrysler vehicles. But he told the Kokomo Tribune for a Wednesday story that he decided to drive his 1989 GMC pickup Monday and intentionally park it in the Chrysler-only lot.



"I did it to protest this policy because I don't like it," Campbell said.



DaimlerChrysler had his car towed about 3½ miles to Kokomo's Fisher Towing Service in the city 50 miles north of Indianapolis.



Owner Jim Davis said he towed two cars from the plant Monday without knowing the specifics of the new policy. After learning more, Davis said he decided to stop towing cars from the lot and would not charge owners of vehicles he had already hauled away.



"I thought we were towing them for being parked illegally until I learned the full scoop of it," said Davis. "Now we're not going to do it. "



The policy designates about 80 percent of employee parking spaces for Chrysler vehicles only and forces workers to park much farther away if they drive a vehicle made by a competing manufacturer.



New blue lines were painted on the parking lot and signs declaring "DaimlerChrysler Parking Only" and "DaimlerChrysler Vehicle Parking" were installed about two weeks ago. Last week, employees began receiving noncompliance warnings leading up to this week's towing enforcement.



Davis is not alone in refusing to tow cars from the lot.



Don Ellmore, owner of Martin Wrecker Service, also turned down a job at the plant.



"We backed off for customer relations reasons," he said. "It's just not worth it to aggravate somebody. "



Chrysler spokesman Edward Saenz said the automaker does not expect towing to be an issue.



"We're not expecting to tow people," he said. "We don't expect that to happen very often. "



He had said earlier that a survey indicated 90 percent of Chrysler workers drive Chrysler vehicles.
 
So by that logic if you work at a Charmin toilet paper factory you can only use Charmin? If you work at a Miller bottling company you can't drink Bud? Give me a break...
 
I bet that they use Charmin toilet paper and Charmin... That would be funny if they didn't let somebody use XYZ brand of toilet paper that they brought from home and sent them to the jon on the other end of the parking lot :-laf
 
Decades ago my grandfather worked for Studebaker. Studebaker had a policy that any employee buying a new car must buy a Studebaker or not be an employee any more. My grandfather wanted to buy a Dodge, so he bought the Dodge and bought a used Studebaker to drive to work for a year. He then sold the Studebaker, started driving the Dodge to work and told everyone he had just bought the Dodge used.
 
That's cute. I'm glad DC has nothing better to worry about... like SAYYYY... . inferior auto transmissions...



gotta have your priorities straight.
 
I agree with the policy to a point.



I don't feel to highly about someone that will buy a competing product to what they produce, the cavaet being you have to produce something similar. Say you want RV Dodge does not have a comapny that makes RV out of their Vans/trucks so you buy a Ford conversion RV okay in my book, but if you need a minivan and you buy a Ford Windstar than not so good.



Have some pride in what you build/sell and support yourself!
 
I smell a lawsuit coming.



As an autoworker, you're not exactly raking it in. So, if you have a competing brand's car and drive to work in it, your are being discriminated against by being forced to park at another lot. If you cannot afford to buy a DC product, you can't afford it and it's not necessarily your fault. It is unjust, and I'm sure some lawyer will agree.



Just like the clothing company The Gap. They forced employees only to wear Gap clothing. Well, they were sued, and the company was given the choice of allowing other clothing to be worn, or provide the clothing for employees. I know it's a different situation, but very similar.



A company can't force you to buy their products, and legally they cannot discriminate based on what type of products you use/own.
 
I could see enforcing this for non-domestic makes, But come-on this is goofy



Next thing you know, dealership employees will have to only drive what they sell (not terrible for me :-laf )



Seperate lot, maybe

Lot that is way farther away?, no way
 
This is just dumb! If you make a product and then tell your employees "use it or else" what kind of American are you? This is rediculous and I would NOT buy any product or work for any company that said I had to use theirs. What hapenned to having freedom to choose where to spend your money? Supporting what you build and sell? Isn't showing up every day you're supposed to and working your butt off for your paycheck enough anymore?
 
Everyone is missing the point

You need to read the post again "park in a reserved spot" I agree with this policy 100%!!! Any vehicle can be driven to work, just the DC vehicles can park in the front lot, and the non DC's need to be parked in the back lot. It is simple you have a choice, either drive a DC product and park in the front row, or drive a not DC and park in the back.
 
I suspect the law is unconstitutional. It's also stupid. So if some financially challenged person takes a job there, and happens to own a none DC vehicle, he has to sell it and buy a DC vehicle to be able to park in 80% of the parking spaces? What is 21% of the employees don't own a DC vehicle? Then someone can't park there at all. Sounds like illegal discrimination to me. This makes about as much sense as Microsoft banning the use of Apple iPods.
 
this is a throwback to about 25 years ago when "japanese" cars were not allowed in ford, chevrolet, or dodge employee lots.



now adays i don't think this matters, especially since my caravan was assembled in canada and my truck in mexico. meanwhile the honda is made in ohio.



i understand that they are looking for some measure of loyalty from their employees. beyond that i am not sure what the point is.



jim
 
Whats wrong with product and company loyality! He broke several RULES with a attitude. Should have towed it further like the next state. Employee was acting like a *** and deserved what he got at the least. The dealers I worked for kind of expected a long term employee to drive their products or at least to ASK if it was ok to buy this off the used lot etc. It was always a verbal ok but it was a courtersy to ask. Service personal(service manager and such)always drove the product they handled(always). Why step on toes that pay the house note and supplied your kids with food!
 
:rolleyes: Unless they are going to pay for or at least pay the difference between DC and brand x, you should be able to park where you want.
 
Tomeygun, back when I worked at a certain Chevrolet dealer, I was still driving my toyota everyday, as were 7 of the other 21 employees :-laf



-Will
 
We don't know the whole story here. I bet there is more to this than Joe Employee just parking in the wrong spot. I wouldn't have a problem with the policy, just would be glad to have the job. Not much different than a dress code, right?
 
I absolutely agree with the policey. Too many people are missing the point and too many people are just sue/lawsuit happy and "politically correct". I have been in consumer goods sales all of my life, if you don't support the product you sell or manufacture your in the wrong job.



Why give the business to your competitor? Why not support your product, increase sales & market share, get a bigger bonus at the end of year?. Look - the guy was not told HE couldn't drive a competitors vehicle, only that he could not park a competitive vehicle in the DC only lot. And to add fuel to the fire, he was a D!@K about it.



I remember a sales training meeting several years ago and a new employee brought out a direct competitors product and started using it. She was kindly asked to dispose of it, which she did and it was a good thing. How stupid was she... . gets a new job and uses a direct competitors product IN FRONT of everyone.



Support the company and products that support you. Nuff said.
 
Last edited:
tschwab said:
I absolutely agree with the policey. Too many people are missing the point and too many people are just sue/lawsuit happy and "politically correct". I have been in consumer goods sales all of my life, if you don't support the product you sell or manufacture your in the wrong job.



Why give the business to your competitor? Why not support your product, increase sales & market share, get a bigger bonus at the end of year?. Look - the guy was not told HE couldn't drive a competitors vehicle, only that he could not park a competitive vehicle in the DC only lot. And to add fuel to the fire, he was a D!@K about it.



I remember a sales training meeting several years ago and a new employee brought out a direct competitors product and started using it. She was kindly asked to dispose of it, which she did and it was a good thing. How stupid was she... . gets a new job and uses a direct competitors product IN FRONT of everyone.



Support the company and products that support you. Nuff said.



I agree. I know of a technician who worked at a Chevy dealership and went to another Chevy dealership about 5 miles away and bought a used Chevy truck. He promptly lost his job. Think of it from a business owner's perspective. Here one of your own employees is helping your competition. He can work for them if he wants.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top